It Just Keeps Getting Better: FEC Records Indicate Hillary Campaign Illegally Laundered $84 Million

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Deep state operatives..... too damn funny.

Seriously, though ... just stop, freaks....

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Here's the funniest part of the story:

What Hilary did was completely legal - because the lawyer suing her in this case won a case in front of the Supreme Court five years ago to allow this exact sort of bundling, on behalf of a Republican donor.

Yep, all true.

 

[easyt65]

Not sure what is more amusing; that you wrote it or that you may actually believe it.

What you continue to do is more amusing....

.
.
.

 

[jon_berzerk]

"The press continues to feed the dying Russia collusion conspiracy theory, spending Friday’s news cycle regurgitating Democrat talking points from the just-filed Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act lawsuit against the Trump campaign, WikiLeaks, and Russia.

Yet the mainstream media took no notice of last week’s federal court filing that exposes an $84 million money-laundering conspiracy the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign executed during the 2016 presidential election in violation of federal campaign-finance law."



"That lawsuit, filed last week in a DC district court, summarizes the DNC-Clinton conspiracy and provides detailed evidence from Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings confirming the complaint’s allegations that Democrats undertook an extensive scheme to violate federal campaign limits."



'The Supreme Court Made It Clear This Is Illegal'

"The illegality of this scheme isn’t a matter of debate. The Supreme Court made clear in 2014 in McCutcheon v. FEC that this exact scenario would violate the law."


HILLARY PROTECTED AGAIN:

'FEC Declines To Follow The Law'

"Upon receipt of Backer’s complaint, the FEC was required to notify those accused of violating federal law of the charges. Then the commissioners were required to determine whether there was “reason to believe” a violation occurred. Following a finding by four FEC commissioners that there was “reason to believe” a violation has occurred, the FEC must investigate the complaint.

Last week Backer turned to federal court, seeking to force the FEC to fulfill its statutory duty. But in this case, the FEC did nothing, other than presumably notify the DNC and Clinton of the charges."

FEC Records Indicate Hillary Campaign Illegally Laundered $84 Million


Let the lying, denying, justifying, and excuse-making from snowflakes begin........

It Just Keeps Getting Better: FEC Records Indicate Hillary Campaign Illegally Laundered $84 Million

--LOL

that was never supposed to see the light of day

luckily Trump whooped her ass in the election

--LOL

 

[easyt65]

Here's the funniest part of the story:

What Hilary did was completely legal

You must have missed this in the article posted:

'The Supreme Court Made It Clear This Is Illegal'

"The illegality of this scheme isn’t a matter of debate. The Supreme Court made clear in 2014 in McCutcheon v. FEC that this exact scenario would violate the law."

 

[Billy_Bob]

Here's the funniest part of the story:

What Hilary did was completely legal - because the lawyer suing her in this case won a case in front of the Supreme Court five years ago to allow this exact sort of bundling, on behalf of a Republican donor.

Actually...No

That case did not involve foreign entities. Hillary's Did..

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Here's the funniest part of the story:

What Hilary did was completely legal - because the lawyer suing her in this case won a case in front of the Supreme Court five years ago to allow this exact sort of bundling, on behalf of a Republican donor.

Actually...No

That case did not involve foreign entities. Hillary Did..

You didn't read the OP. Feel free to try again.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Here's the funniest part of the story:

What Hilary did was completely legal

You must have missed this in the article posted:

'The Supreme Court Made It Clear This Is Illegal'

"The illegality of this scheme isn’t a matter of debate. The Supreme Court made clear in 2014 in McCutcheon v. FEC that this exact scenario would violate the law."

Um, no.

McCutcheon v. FEC is exactly the case that made this sort of bundling completely legal.

Guess who argued that case for McCutcheon?

 

[deanrd]

These Republicans are hilarious. That ship has sailed. Funny how they don't seem to want to give up. They'll believe anything.

Just the fact she already has over a hundred million which she got the old fashioned way, she earned it. Why on earth would she launder money.

It's like:

Obama was born in Kenya

or

Obama run guns to Mexico

Or

Hillary ran a child sex ring out of a pizza parlor.

I swear, Republicans will believe anything, but it's got to be really stupid for them to believe.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Here's the funniest part of the story:

What Hilary did was completely legal - because the lawyer suing her in this case won a case in front of the Supreme Court five years ago to allow this exact sort of bundling, on behalf of a Republican donor.

Actually...No

That case did not involve foreign entities. Hillary Did..

You didn't read the OP. Feel free to try again.

SCOTUS kills your wet dream...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Here's the funniest part of the story:

What Hilary did was completely legal - because the lawyer suing her in this case won a case in front of the Supreme Court five years ago to allow this exact sort of bundling, on behalf of a Republican donor.

Actually...No

That case did not involve foreign entities. Hillary Did..

You didn't read the OP. Feel free to try again.

SCOTUS kills your wet dream...

Dude, you are really not getting this. You are kind of embarrassing yourself. You really need to read up before commenting again.

 

[easyt65]

Here's the funniest part of the story:

What Hilary did was completely legal

You must have missed this in the article posted:

'The Supreme Court Made It Clear This Is Illegal'

"The illegality of this scheme isn’t a matter of debate. The Supreme Court made clear in 2014 in McCutcheon v. FEC that this exact scenario would violate the law."

Um, no.

McCutcheon v. FEC is exactly the case that made this sort of bundling completely legal.

Guess who argued that case for McCutcheon?

You must have missed this in the article posted:

'The Supreme Court Made It Clear This Is Illegal'

"The illegality of this scheme isn’t a matter of debate. The Supreme Court made clear in 2014 in McCutcheon v. FEC that this exact scenario would violate the law."

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You must have missed this in the article posted:

'The Supreme Court Made It Clear This Is Illegal'

That is the opinion of a lawyer blogger who shills for Trump regularly. You aren't citing any facts or sources of facts, you are simply regurgitating an agreeable opinion.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Here's the funniest part of the story:

What Hilary did was completely legal

You must have missed this in the article posted:

'The Supreme Court Made It Clear This Is Illegal'

"The illegality of this scheme isn’t a matter of debate. The Supreme Court made clear in 2014 in McCutcheon v. FEC that this exact scenario would violate the law."

Um, no.

McCutcheon v. FEC is exactly the case that made this sort of bundling completely legal.

Guess who argued that case for McCutcheon?

You must have missed this in the article posted:

'The Supreme Court Made It Clear This Is Illegal'

"The illegality of this scheme isn’t a matter of debate. The Supreme Court made clear in 2014 in McCutcheon v. FEC that this exact scenario would violate the law."

You are free to believe the lawyer is speaking the pure and complete truth, if that's what you'd prefer.

I think that's a pretty dumb idea, particularly when it's the lawyer who made it possible in the first place.

 

[jillian]

"The press continues to feed the dying Russia collusion conspiracy theory, spending Friday’s news cycle regurgitating Democrat talking points from the just-filed Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act lawsuit against the Trump campaign, WikiLeaks, and Russia.

Yet the mainstream media took no notice of last week’s federal court filing that exposes an $84 million money-laundering conspiracy the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign executed during the 2016 presidential election in violation of federal campaign-finance law."



"That lawsuit, filed last week in a DC district court, summarizes the DNC-Clinton conspiracy and provides detailed evidence from Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings confirming the complaint’s allegations that Democrats undertook an extensive scheme to violate federal campaign limits."



'The Supreme Court Made It Clear This Is Illegal'

"The illegality of this scheme isn’t a matter of debate. The Supreme Court made clear in 2014 in McCutcheon v. FEC that this exact scenario would violate the law."


HILLARY PROTECTED AGAIN:

'FEC Declines To Follow The Law'

"Upon receipt of Backer’s complaint, the FEC was required to notify those accused of violating federal law of the charges. Then the commissioners were required to determine whether there was “reason to believe” a violation occurred. Following a finding by four FEC commissioners that there was “reason to believe” a violation has occurred, the FEC must investigate the complaint.

Last week Backer turned to federal court, seeking to force the FEC to fulfill its statutory duty. But in this case, the FEC did nothing, other than presumably notify the DNC and Clinton of the charges."

FEC Records Indicate Hillary Campaign Illegally Laundered $84 Million


Let the lying, denying, justifying, and excuse-making from snowflakes begin........

Trumpscum are getting desperate, eh Sergei?

 

[candycorn]

These Republicans are hilarious. That ship has sailed. Funny how they don't seem to want to give up. They'll believe anything.

Just the fact she already has over a hundred million which she got the old fashioned way, she earned it. Why on earth would she launder money.

It's like:

Obama was born in Kenya

or

Obama run guns to Mexico

Or

Hillary ran a child sex ring out of a pizza parlor.

I swear, Republicans will believe anything, but it's got to be really stupid for them to believe.

Don't forget Hillary's supposed affair with Yoko Ono. That was one lie that was so wide spread by Trump supporters that the mods actually had to intervene:

It's no wonder they can no longer tell truth from fiction; they actually believe their own bullshit.

 

[jillian]

You must have missed this in the article posted:

'The Supreme Court Made It Clear This Is Illegal'

That is the opinion of a lawyer blogger who shills for Trump regularly. You aren't citing any facts or sources of facts, you are simply regurgitating an agreeable opinion.

yes, but this is the type of disinformation Vlad wants his army of trolls to spread

 

[easyt65]

As expected, snowflakes be like...

In their brainwashed minds their dictators / criminals can do no wrong.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

In their brainwashed minds their dictators / criminals can do no wrong.

actually... it kind of seems like everyone, left and right, is sort of agreeing that this system is bogus. Yet only one party has paid lawyers that not only sued to put in place, but then sued opponents for using it.

Weird, huh? And here you are, their little footsoldier, carrying their water... like a good little boy...

 

[TemplarKormac]

Well ain't this sumthin'?

Hmm, no probably not much of anything. This is likely something that would have to be changed through law.

Oooh we have a legal expert on our hands here folks!