It is time to end our relationship with Israel

Didn't you lose the right to make moral arguments when you celebrated Muslims flying planes into buildings :dunno:
The Jew-haters are presenting their one-sided propaganda. They will have posts showing Jewish children taunting non-Jews, but they won’t have posts showing Islamists setting Jewish toddlers on fire and decapitating Jewish babies.
 
Happy news! :eusa_clap:
They also bunch of weirdos.
They dislike Israel because they believe that the jews will only triumph when the Messiah arrives and makes them masters. For them, the emergence of the jewish state does not correspond to their religious canons.
So Israeli jews want to rule using the good old methods of land seizure and genocide. And these religious fanatics are hoping for the coming of the Messiah.
 
The Jew-haters ..... will have posts showing Jewish children taunting non-Jews,
You don't need to be a "Jew-hater" to show those posts and to admit it's true.
... but they won’t have posts showing Islamists setting Jewish toddlers on fire and decapitating Jewish babies.
That's because there are no post showing it. It didn't happen.
 
1772978718270.webp
 
15th post

Oh lookie! More disinformation from Ringo.

No, this proposed bill does not prevent persons from speaking about JC. It is a restriction on "acts of solicitation with the intent to convert religion" (proselytizing). The proposal is brought forward to the Knesset every year, apparently only as a symbolic formality, by two ultra-orthodox members. The reason it is only a formality, it that it will never pass, or even come to a vote, because it goes against the will of the people of Israel and no government would let it go through, including Netanyahu who has said, "We will not advance any law against the Christian community".

Bonus question: how many countries have bans or restrictions on proselytization?
 
Maybe slogan "Death to America!" from Iran also formality?
Sure. Maybe it is. But in order for it to BE only a formality, you would have to produce the capable, effective, authoritative government or government body which prevents the formality from being enacted. Can you produce that for Iran?

I'd also suggest that "death to [insert State here]" is significantly different from banning or restricting proselytizing, not only morally and legally, but by the acceptance of these bans and restrictions by many countries.
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom