the topic isnt about civil spaces its about safe spaces,,
and elon is doing what previous owners of twitter failed to do and making it a civil space where all voices are heard,,
Actually it is. The topic is whether content moderation should happen. In other words if twitter has a right or a need to limit what a person can say. For instance making the conversation "civil".
Here's the thing. Twitter creates revenue "money" by exposing it's customers to advertising. This is by far their greatest money maker.
If your claim is that twitter not just can't, but shouldn't or even, doesn't have the right to limit what is permissible on their platform you are taking away their possibility to decide for themselves what is on that platform. For instance posting a Swastika, Star of David hybrid that Kanye just posted.
It is not inconceivable, it is even likely that a platform that allows these kinds of things will lose customers. This will make it less attractive to advertisers. Or advertisers might decide for themselves that they do not want to be associated with a platform that is filled with that. I can make similar examples of posting porn, or simply spam.
I'm perfectly willing too accept that you find this acceptable or a small price to pay to be on a completely free speech platform. I however don't believe that is a majority opinion. Or for that matter a winning business model.
I'm also not smart enough to say what exactly is the correct amount of moderation. I can guess though that the answer is somewhere in the middle. Which is what the previous owners did. Something that Musk disagrees with, and something that by all accounts has cost the company he bought, quite a lot of add revenue.
