It Is LEGAL...

[Hossfly]

So... how many times does it have to be said? If you're the super rich... you can do no wrong. You can look straight into a camera to millions of people and tell a blatant lie like, "I only used one device," or "I did not have sexual relations with that woman," and get away with it... and actually have people respect you.

Don't forget being white .

Look at those Oregon milita dudes

Hint: Loud, braying Democraps had better start running now! Uh oh! No place to hide.

 

[WillowTree]

- To possess clasified info w/out a clearance

- To have an unauthorized, unencrypted server with classified information on it

- To give people without security clearances access to material 'so classified it can not be released in any format without causing grave damage to our national security'.

- To store a classified server / information in the un-secured bathroom of an IT company that doesn't have the required security clearance.

- To have your MAID print out and read your classified e-mails.

- To have a secretary e-mail herself via Yahoo.com, store 650,000 sensitive/classified e-mails on a laptop shared with a pedophile who has no security clearance and who is sexting a 15yo.

- To violate the FOIA and the Federal Records Act by NOT turning over thousands of State Department-related work e-mails.

- To NOT report having / NOT turn over devices on which classified is stored...to violate official laws regarding destruction of classified and destroying classified devices as well as 30,000+ e-mails AFTER those documents are subpoenaed.

- Lying under oath to Congress, Lying under oath to the FBI

- The AG meeting secretly with the spouse of a suspect under investigation by the FBI / DOJ

- The AG blocking the FBI's access to a Grand Jury

- Rigging your own Primary, and the President of the United States advocating criminal election fraud, and encouraging illegals to help STEAL the Presidency

...only if you are Barry, Hillary, Loretta Lynch, Huma, or some other liberal protected by Fidel Obama and his lawless administration.

Only for Hillary.

 

[WillowTree]

It is also legal to run guns into Mexico then claim executive privilege when a border patrol agent is murdered with one of those guns!

 

[candycorn]

So... how many times does it have to be said? If you're the super rich... you can do no wrong. You can look straight into a camera to millions of people and tell a blatant lie like, "I only used one device," or "I did not have sexual relations with that woman," and get away with it... and actually have people respect you.

Or get a way with bragging about sexual assault as your messiah did.

My messiah? Trump is a loser too. Watching his clips about walking into the Miss America pageant dressing rooms and bragging about the women not having clothes on? Not to mention all the other stuff he's said?

Whatever loser

 

[candycorn]

You guys lost.
Get over it.

Time to start working on your “The war on Christmas” nonsense.

Dear candycorn
Did opponents "get over" Bush ? or push until he backed down on WMD arguments?

This isn't going to end, as we're still paying trillions for the war, trillions for ACA, and it doesn't go away.

Good points.

But what I was talking about was the standard right wing, outrage du jour; War on Christmas, followed by the outrage over the Oscar nominations and retards proudly proclaiming that they wouldn’t step foot in a theater for a million dollars, followed by “What if there was a Ms. White America” pageant, followed by the calls for civil war that happens all the time. You know, the usual stuff.

Dear candycorn
Well, maybe it would be fair to let public institutions embrace instead of remove references to Christmas if govt is going to endorse LGBT beliefs and expression implemented through public policy and schools.

If Christians could have free and uncensored recognition and expression of Christian prayer to God, references to crosses and Bible, creation and prolife,
Would that help them get over the beliefs in right to marriage and right to health care mandated by govt?

If govt equally mandated right to prayer and right to life so Christians are endorsed and protected equally as LGBT beliefs right to marriage and right to health care?

Would that stop cries over discrimination if everyone agreed to quit harassing each other for either beliefs in homosexuality or Christianity?

Instead of govt abused to endorse LGBT beliefs as a creed while removing references to Christian beliefs. Isn't that discriminating by creed as a double standard not to allow both to be endorsed by govt equally?

I seem to have missed my elected officals endorsing LGBT beliefs

 

[candycorn]

Or get a way with bragging about sexual assault as your messiah did.

You post THIS after someone reminded you about Teddy Kennedy's crimes? Unbelievable.

"But Trump said naughty words!"

Ted Kennedy has been dead for 10 years and his "crime" is something like 40 years ago. But please keep trying to be relevant. It's fun to watch.

 

[WillowTree]

Or get a way with bragging about sexual assault as your messiah did.

You post THIS after someone reminded you about Teddy Kennedy's crimes? Unbelievable.

"But Trump said naughty words!"

Ted Kennedy has been dead for 10 years and his "crime" is something like 40 years ago. But please keep trying to be relevant. It's fun to watch.

Like you guys don't dig Tim McVeigh up every time terrorism is brought up?

 

[candycorn]

Or get a way with bragging about sexual assault as your messiah did.

You post THIS after someone reminded you about Teddy Kennedy's crimes? Unbelievable.

"But Trump said naughty words!"

Ted Kennedy has been dead for 10 years and his "crime" is something like 40 years ago. But please keep trying to be relevant. It's fun to watch.

Like you guys don't dig Tim McVeigh up every time terrorism is brought up?

I didn't know he was one of your heroes. So sorry. I'm confused. Are you talking about convicted murderer Tim McVeigh?

 

[WillowTree]

Or get a way with bragging about sexual assault as your messiah did.

You post THIS after someone reminded you about Teddy Kennedy's crimes? Unbelievable.

"But Trump said naughty words!"

Ted Kennedy has been dead for 10 years and his "crime" is something like 40 years ago. But please keep trying to be relevant. It's fun to watch.

Like you guys don't dig Tim McVeigh up every time terrorism is brought up?

I didn't know he was one of your heroes. So sorry. I'm confused. Are you talking about convicted murderer Tim McVeigh?

I am talking about your perpetual state of hypocrisy.

 

[candycorn]

Or get a way with bragging about sexual assault as your messiah did.

You post THIS after someone reminded you about Teddy Kennedy's crimes? Unbelievable.

"But Trump said naughty words!"

Ted Kennedy has been dead for 10 years and his "crime" is something like 40 years ago. But please keep trying to be relevant. It's fun to watch.

Like you guys don't dig Tim McVeigh up every time terrorism is brought up?

I didn't know he was one of your heroes. So sorry. I'm confused. Are you talking about convicted murderer Tim McVeigh?

I am talking about your perpetual state of hypocrisy.

Mr. Kennedy is an elected Senator who was never charged (or convicted) of any crime (TTBOMK).
Your hero McVeigh is a convicted felon, admitted murderer.

Huge difference. No hypocrisy exists.

 

[emilynghiem]

- To possess clasified info w/out a clearance

- To have an unauthorized, unencrypted server with classified information on it

- To give people without security clearances access to material 'so classified it can not be released in any format without causing grave damage to our national security'.

- To store a classified server / information in the un-secured bathroom of an IT company that doesn't have the required security clearance.

- To have your MAID print out and read your classified e-mails.

- To have a secretary e-mail herself via Yahoo.com, store 650,000 sensitive/classified e-mails on a laptop shared with a pedophile who has no security clearance and who is sexting a 15yo.

- To violate the FOIA and the Federal Records Act by NOT turning over thousands of State Department-related work e-mails.

- To NOT report having / NOT turn over devices on which classified is stored...to violate official laws regarding destruction of classified and destroying classified devices as well as 30,000+ e-mails AFTER those documents are subpoenaed.

- Lying under oath to Congress, Lying under oath to the FBI

- The AG meeting secretly with the spouse of a suspect under investigation by the FBI / DOJ

- The AG blocking the FBI's access to a Grand Jury

- Rigging your own Primary, and the President of the United States advocating criminal election fraud, and encouraging illegals to help STEAL the Presidency

...only if you are Barry, Hillary, Loretta Lynch, Huma, or some other liberal protected by Fidel Obama and his lawless administration.

Hi easyt65 yes and no.
Like copyright laws, the minute you produce the work, it is your property and you can defend your intellectual property rights. But to prove it legally requires a copyright and defending that copyright.

OJ's case proved you could get away with "wrongful death" as he lost the civil trial and was found at fault,
but WON the criminal case because of benefit of the doubt and introducing a "reasonable doubt" in the minds of the jury.

here the minds of the jury are the public.
And as long as there is doubt, sure, people can get away with murder.
they are not legally required to incriminate themselves.
So it is legal to lie by omission and get away with murder!
It is still murder and still unlawful the minute you commit the act.
But what you prove in court is under a different burden of proof.
Unlike liberals who take this literally to determine what is true or false,
people should be taught the difference. We can't depend on govt to determine true or false or it becomes like a religious authority a pope to dictate what to believe, which is dangerous.

See question I asked of Lakhota about INTENT:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15745571/
The issue with Clinton's emails is NOT a question if they contained classified
information or not because this was confirmed. the unproveable point remains
INTENT which is IN DOUBT, just as with OJ murder case that could not be proven
BEYOND DOUBT. For civil standards preponderance of the evidence is all that is
needed, so he lost that case; but for criminal charges, this required to remove all "doubt."

In her case it has even been established that classified materials were on that server
"that should never have been transmitted" as this is violation of standards and rules.

However, as with OJ, there is "doubt' as to her INTENT.
My point is that it STILL makes it wrong even if it cannot be proven.
Just going by what the authorities can prove, is not enough.

This reminds me of the case of Robert Durst who did not deny killing
a man in Galveston, but his lawyers managed to argue he did not have INTENT to kill.
Because it could not be proven it was not accidental in the course of self defense as he claimed,
and the intent to murder was cast in doubt.

the man was still killed by Durst, but since INTENT could not be proven
he was not found guilty of murder because it wasn't beyond "reasonable doubt"

 

[easyt65]

'Copyright Law'?! O J Simpson?



You're talking about CLASSIFIED INFORMATION and all Rules, Regs, and LAWS (that were broken) dealing with the illegal possession, transportation storage, handling, and destruction of that CLASSIFIED information, information SO classified the WH said it could not be released in ANY format to ANYONE without CAUSING GRAVE DAMAGE TO OUR NATIONAL SECURITY...

...except Hillary had illegal posession of that information and released that information to IT Techs who had no security clearances, to lawyers who had no security clearances, to a pedophile who had no security clearance, to a Philipino Maid who had no security clearance, and - according to security experts - 99% chance she also gave access to that information to 5 foreign nations, NONE of them our friends!

Numerous people involved in this case, including Hillary and Barry committed Perjury, lied to Congress, lied to the FBI, obstructed justice, destroyed evidence after that evidence was subpoenaed, the head of the DOJ secretly met with the spouse of one of the suspects in ONE of SEVERAL FBI investigations - an act any lawyer will tell you is unethical and will get you fired.

This is the biggest criminal scandal in the history of the United States, with proven connections running all the way to the Oval Office...

So WTF are you talking about regarding 'copyright' laws and OJ Simpson?!

 

[easyt65]

It is also legal to run guns into Mexico then claim executive privilege when a border patrol agent is murdered with one of those guns!

Not just to Mexico. President Obama just had the DOJ drop all charges against the disgruntled International Weapons Dealer - who he and Hillary used to run weapons to Al Qaeida - the terrorists who murdered 3,000 Americans on 9/11/01 - in Libya and to ISIS in Syria THROUGH Benghazi, Libya - in an attempt to buy his silence and keep the details from becoming public.

Again, arming Al Qaeida, the murderers of 3,000 Americans, and ISIS, the murderers of thousands worldwide, is TREASON!

Taking the United States without Congressionak authorization to do so to HELP TERRORIST - again the murderers who slaughtered 3,000 Americans - IS TREASON!

 

[easyt65]

- To possess clasified info w/out a clearance

- To have an unauthorized, unencrypted server with classified information on it

- To give people without security clearances access to material 'so classified it can not be released in any format without causing grave damage to our national security'.

- To store a classified server / information in the un-secured bathroom of an IT company that doesn't have the required security clearance.

- To have your MAID print out and read your classified e-mails.

- To have a secretary e-mail herself via Yahoo.com, store 650,000 sensitive/classified e-mails on a laptop shared with a pedophile who has no security clearance and who is sexting a 15yo.

- To violate the FOIA and the Federal Records Act by NOT turning over thousands of State Department-related work e-mails.

- To NOT report having / NOT turn over devices on which classified is stored...to violate official laws regarding destruction of classified and destroying classified devices as well as 30,000+ e-mails AFTER those documents are subpoenaed.

- Lying under oath to Congress, Lying under oath to the FBI

- The AG meeting secretly with the spouse of a suspect under investigation by the FBI / DOJ

- The AG blocking the FBI's access to a Grand Jury

- Rigging your own Primary, and the President of the United States advocating criminal election fraud, and encouraging illegals to help STEAL the Presidency

...only if you are Barry, Hillary, Loretta Lynch, Huma, or some other liberal protected by Fidel Obama and his lawless administration.

Hi easyt65 yes and no.
Like copyright laws, the minute you produce the work, it is your property and you can defend your intellectual property rights. But to prove it legally requires a copyright and defending that copyright.

OJ's case proved you could get away with "wrongful death" as he lost the civil trial and was found at fault,
but WON the criminal case because of benefit of the doubt and introducing a "reasonable doubt" in the minds of the jury.

here the minds of the jury are the public.
And as long as there is doubt, sure, people can get away with murder.
they are not legally required to incriminate themselves.
So it is legal to lie by omission and get away with murder!
It is still murder and still unlawful the minute you commit the act.
But what you prove in court is under a different burden of proof.
Unlike liberals who take this literally to determine what is true or false,
people should be taught the difference. We can't depend on govt to determine true or false or it becomes like a religious authority a pope to dictate what to believe, which is dangerous.

See question I asked of Lakhota about INTENT:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/posts/15745571/
The issue with Clinton's emails is NOT a question if they contained classified
information or not because this was confirmed. the unproveable point remains
INTENT which is IN DOUBT, just as with OJ murder case that could not be proven
BEYOND DOUBT. For civil standards preponderance of the evidence is all that is
needed, so he lost that case; but for criminal charges, this required to remove all "doubt."

In her case it has even been established that classified materials were on that server
"that should never have been transmitted" as this is violation of standards and rules.

However, as with OJ, there is "doubt' as to her INTENT.
My point is that it STILL makes it wrong even if it cannot be proven.
Just going by what the authorities can prove, is not enough.

This reminds me of the case of Robert Durst who did not deny killing
a man in Galveston, but his lawyers managed to argue he did not have INTENT to kill.
Because it could not be proven it was not accidental in the course of self defense as he claimed,
and the intent to murder was cast in doubt.

the man was still killed by Durst, but since INTENT could not be proven
he was not found guilty of murder because it wasn't beyond "reasonable doubt"

'INTENT' has been obvious from the start. Hillary Clinton sought to citcumvent the FOIA & the Federal Records Act, which required her to turn over copies of all work-related material for government transparency. Her INTENT all along was to hide her actions, even at the expense of National Security.

- Using an UN-authorized server

- Violating the FOIA & The Federal Records Act by NOT turning in THOUSANDS of work-related documents, according to FBI Director under Oath testifying before Congress.

- Destroying 30,000 documents AFTER they had been subpoenaed

- Committing PERJURY by telling Congress she only used 1 device, when she used MULTIPLE - again according to FBI Director under Oath testifying before Congress.

- Committing PERJURY by telling Congress she had turned over all work-related documents when she had NOT, again according to FBI Director under Oath testifying before Congress.

- Huma Abedin committing PERJURY by telling the FBI she had turned over all devices and wss not storing / keeping e-mails. 650,000 e-mails later...

Hellen Keller and Ray Charles could see the 'INTENT' here.

An ex-Director of the FBI declared this much evidence is why you indict, why you call for a Grand Jury, and stated the FBI has prosecuted cases with far, FAR LESS evidence of 'INTENT'.

 

[Snouter]

It is hard to believe anyone would be shameless enough to have a Huma Weiner avatar. Even the pro-Crooked Hillary douchebags with their gay, photoshopped pics of republicans don't have Crooked Hillary avatars.

 

[Claudette]

You guys lost.
Get over it.

Time to start working on your “The war on Christmas” nonsense.

If you say so.

Say can you tell me why Hillary's maid was faxing classified and sensitive material from hillarys personal server at her home??

According to security experts if anyone did that they would be fired and face criminal charges.

Seems Hillary is above the law.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

HilLIARy Clinton will never be accepted as President by the American public.

 

[easyt65]

At least not by all of them.

Barry has never been 'My President'. Hillary won't be, either.

 

[NYcarbineer]

- To possess clasified info w/out a clearance

- To have an unauthorized, unencrypted server with classified information on it

- To give people without security clearances access to material 'so classified it can not be released in any format without causing grave damage to our national security'.

- To store a classified server / information in the un-secured bathroom of an IT company that doesn't have the required security clearance.

- To have your MAID print out and read your classified e-mails.

- To have a secretary e-mail herself via Yahoo.com, store 650,000 sensitive/classified e-mails on a laptop shared with a pedophile who has no security clearance and who is sexting a 15yo.

- To violate the FOIA and the Federal Records Act by NOT turning over thousands of State Department-related work e-mails.

- To NOT report having / NOT turn over devices on which classified is stored...to violate official laws regarding destruction of classified and destroying classified devices as well as 30,000+ e-mails AFTER those documents are subpoenaed.

- Lying under oath to Congress, Lying under oath to the FBI

- The AG meeting secretly with the spouse of a suspect under investigation by the FBI / DOJ

- The AG blocking the FBI's access to a Grand Jury

- Rigging your own Primary, and the President of the United States advocating criminal election fraud, and encouraging illegals to help STEAL the Presidency

...only if you are Barry, Hillary, Loretta Lynch, Huma, or some other liberal protected by Fidel Obama and his lawless administration.

Turn off your radio.

 

[candycorn]

HilLIARy Clinton will never be accepted as President by the American public.

Looking forward to 8 years of pouting? Good. Its been shown that unhappy people live shorter lives; just so you know.