It has been 5 days since the Comey testimony...has the NYT located their 4 sources for comment, yet?

[ColonelAngus]

Their retraction article for their printed lies about Trump/Comey claimed their sources "were not immediately available for comment."

Well, it has been 5 days...Are their 4 sources STILL unavailable? I'd like to know how their sources got their LIES and why the NYT printed the lies.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/08/us/politics/james-comey-new-york-times-article-russia.html

"Mr. Comey did not say exactly what he believed was incorrect about the article, which was based on information from four current and former American officials, all of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity because the information was classified. The original sources could not immediately be reached after Mr. Comey’s remarks, but in the months since the article was published, they have indicated that they believed the account was solid."

Well, it's been 5 days....what are their comments? Seems that they had plenty to say before COMEY testified.

 

[mamooth]

So, have those charges against Comey been filed yet?

No?

You mean Trump was lying about Comey being guilty of "leaking", and you fell for it?

Imagine that.

 

[Thinker101]

So, have those charges against Comey been filed yet?

No?

You mean Trump was lying about Comey being guilty of "leaking", and you fell for it?

Imagine that.

There appears to be much bigger fish on the radar, namely Lynch, Clinton and Obama.

 

[ColonelAngus]

So, have those charges against Comey been filed yet?

No?

You mean Trump was lying about Comey being guilty of "leaking", and you fell for it?

Imagine that.

The NYT had to retract their lies.

They said their sources were not immediately available for comment.

It has been 5 days.

Where are their comments?

I bet if COMEY had CONFIRMED their information, they be very fucking available for comment.

 

[ColonelAngus]

CNN also had to retract their lies...

CNN issues correction after Comey statement contradicts reporting

This is "FAKE NEWS", correct?

NYT and CNN print lies....good to know they should be ignored...especially when CNN colluded with the DNC.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Their retraction article for their printed lies about Trump/Comey claimed their sources "were not immediately available for comment."

Well, it has been 5 days...Are their 4 sources STILL unavailable? I'd like to know how their sources got their LIES and why the NYT printed the lies.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/08/us/politics/james-comey-new-york-times-article-russia.html

"Mr. Comey did not say exactly what he believed was incorrect about the article, which was based on information from four current and former American officials, all of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity because the information was classified. The original sources could not immediately be reached after Mr. Comey’s remarks, but in the months since the article was published, they have indicated that they believed the account was solid."

Well, it's been 5 days....what are their comments? Seems that they had plenty to say before COMEY testified.

Non-existent entities are often not available for comment.