It Gets Crazier And Crazier

[Billy_Kinetta]

One cannot help but wonder how this country produced such insanity.

Oregon allowing 15-year-olds to get state-subsidized sex-change operations The Seaton Post

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Insanity

 

[tinydancer]

Wow. Just wow.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Oregon had slipped into the abyss.

 

[Katzndogz]

Those poor children.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Billy, here is your chance: move to Oregon.

 

[emilynghiem]

One cannot help but wonder how this country produced such insanity.

Oregon allowing 15-year-olds to get state-subsidized sex-change operations The Seaton Post

Dear Billy_Kinetta
You are getting way ahead of me, hold on.
I am still stuck at where did all the prochoice Democrats go
when it came to the federal health insurance mandates penalizing taxpayers for not buying insurance 'as the only choice."
Why is it only the Prolife people yelling about the right to choose but the "prochoice" side is silent on the mandates
that punish free choice in ways they would never allow for abortion, for drug legalization, etc.

Why is it okay to push for free CHOICE of taking drugs, without any penalty or responsibliity for the cost of health damage, but it is okay to fine people over the CHOICE to pay for health care directly without mandating insurance? Why support free choice of abortion, drugs, etc. and not the choice of health care?

BTW with the minors undergoing procedures
* it's okay for minors to have abortions without parental consent
* and now for minors to have sex changes with or without parental guidance and approval

But when it comes to spiritual therapy to help people heal from causes of homosexual attractions, then reparative or conversion therapy needs to be BANNED for minors. NOT a choice.

But drugs, abortion, anything else can be a legal choice, free from any penalty or regulation on the person's free choice.

But NOT choosing to pay for health care other ways besides insurance or
NOT choosing counseling and healing therapy to remove the causes of either heterosexual or homosexual conflicts those people CHOOSE to address and resolve.

Only certain choices count as being "prochoice"
The others are not valid choices so they must be banned and punished.
And it is not taking any freedom from anyone anyway,
since those options weren't viable to begin with, so no freedom was lost.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

One cannot help but wonder how this country produced such insanity.

Oregon allowing 15-year-olds to get state-subsidized sex-change operations The Seaton Post

The irrational tolerance of Relativism... OKA: Evil.

 

[JakeStarkey]

"The irrational tolerance of Relativism... OKA: Evil" is in fact that defense by Keys of slavery, the Confederacy, and the flag, which is supposedly the defense of Natural Law.

Yeah, Keys is squirrely.

 

[jknowgood]

Can't drink a beer, but is mature enough to ruin their lives. Only in a liberals mind.

 

[Staidhup]

That about sums up Oregon to a T. The little San Francisco up north.

 

[Derideo_Te]

The OP would much prefer that these 15 year olds just commit suicide instead?

 

[jknowgood]

The OP would much prefer that these 15 year olds just commit suicide instead?

Well you encouraging his behavior will probably lead to that. Trans sexuals have a high rate of suicide. Liberalism makes people miserable. Liberals think that a fifteen year old is mature enough to cut his pecker off, a life long decision. But isn't mature enough to drive a car. Lol

 

[emilynghiem]

"The irrational tolerance of Relativism... OKA: Evil" is in fact that defense by Keys of slavery, the Confederacy, and the flag, which is supposedly the defense of Natural Law.

Yeah, Keys is squirrely.

JakeStarkey
The natural laws tend toward equal freedom.

So freedom FROM slavery would be where natural laws and conscience move toward.

And freedom FROM govt mandates restricting health are choices would be the direction toward independent self-governance

Now let's look at some of the choices people are divided over
* for the choice of abortion, the prolife is saying that isn't a lawful choice, like murder is not a lawful choice
Since it cannot be proven if the soul of that unborn child is alive or not yet,
as long as the people who want that choice "take responsibility for that choice"
(and don't dump it on people who DON'T believe in that choice or paying for it,
at least you separate people by faith to take responsibility for their own choices and costs)

* however for health care
people who are asking to take control of their own health care without depending on govt
aren't allowed that choice. they are being forced to fund the other policy they don't even believe in.
* with birth control and abortion, people are attacked for not wanting to fund this.
* with drug legalization, where are the rules that say if you choose to take drugs
that have a risk of damaging your mind body health and relations, then YOU agree to pay for the consequences
and not expect taxpayers to pay for your medical or legal costs especially those who VERBALLY stated or
publicly established they don't believe in funding that.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Sigh. You are squirrely, too, but like a nice kind of squirrely, Emily.

 

[emilynghiem]

The OP would much prefer that these 15 year olds just commit suicide instead?

No Derideo_Te
Spiritual Healing therapy would take that suicidal pressure off both
the people who want to change or cannot change. It works regardless of the situation.
When people have the emotional conflicts removed and resolved,
they can better think clearly to solve their own problems, step by step.

The Gay advocates need to quit demonizing and denying the spiritual healing help of the Christian community;
especially if their whole argument is to be inclusive and not denounce or attack people just because of these differences.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Gay advocates have every right to tell Christian "spiritual healers" to vamos if they so wish.

If you truly value them, you will vamos.

MYOB.

 

[jknowgood]

Gay advocates have every right to tell Christian "spiritual healers" to vamos if they so wish.

If you truly value them, you will vamos.

MYOB.

So do Christians to queers? Right?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Gay advocates have every right to tell Christian "spiritual healers" to vamos if they so wish.

If you truly value them, you will vamos.

MYOB.

So do Christians to queers? Right?

In private matters, you bet. Has a gay asked you to perform a gay wedding at your church? Tell them to bug off.

 

[jknowgood]

Gay advocates have every right to tell Christian "spiritual healers" to vamos if they so wish.

If you truly value them, you will vamos.

MYOB.

So do Christians to queers? Right?

In private matters, you bet. Has a gay asked you to perform a gay wedding at your church? Tell them to bug off.

Lol, that's funny. It's on the queer agenda, trust me.