Israel's Legal Right To Exist

[rylah]

They have titles, deeds and keys. The squatters are your buddies.

You're forever befuddled. The major land holdings in the area of Pal'istan (aside from lands set aside by the Ottomans as an Islamist waqf), were those of absentee landlords in Egypt, Lebanon and Syria.

When did the European xtian Crusaders / colonists become native inhabitants?

Maybe he thinks they were the natives who built Solomon's Temple.

Yes, their ancestors that practiced Judaism, before they converted to Christianity (then Islam) , would have built most things in the area now called Palestine, including Soloman's Temple if it really was built. Now you are starting learn. Good for you.

Isn't it interesting how most Christians & Muslims have Jewish bloodlines in their veins & arteries? Do you like gefilte fish?

Well, most Christians have no Jewish blood, being mostly European, New World people or Asian (Philippines) , but you are correct, many of the Muslims and Christians of Palestine have Jewish ancestors. Conversely, European Jews have Christian ancestors.

We get it - people don't live in a bubble.
The Palestinians btw too, especially with all the conquests throughout history.
It doesn't prove any of what You've been trying so far.

 

[rylah]

BTW how would You explain all those specific tribal and geographical surnames that are common to the Palestinians?
As well as their leader actually saying openly on TV that they're mostly of Egyptian, Syrian and SA origins?

And don't go "hasbara troll" on me, just explain how You perceive it.

 

[montelatici]

Your comment is out of the Hasbara playbook, you are following it to the letter. This is used as part of the Palestinian delegitimization process the Hasbara has in place. When the "a land without a people" meme proved impossible to defend, Zionist propaganda began tilting towards claiming that the inhabitants living in Palestine were somehow, from elsewhere. Of course, that is also difficult to defend because there have always been people in Palestine.

Those tribal and geographical surnames are in themselves fake assertions, part of the Hasbara propaganda machine. As far as what a Hamas leader states, I would ignore and rely on genetic studies which demonstrate that Palestinian DNA is overwhelmingly indigenous to the area.

 

[Hollie]

Your comment is out of the Hasbara playbook, you are following it to the letter. This is used as part of the Palestinian delegitimization process the Hasbara has in place. When the "a land without a people" meme proved impossible to defend, Zionist propaganda began tilting towards claiming that the inhabitants living in Palestine were somehow, from elsewhere. Of course, that is also difficult to defend because there have always been people in Palestine.

Those tribal and geographical surnames are in themselves fake assertions, part of the Hasbara propaganda machine. As far as what a Hamas leader states, I would ignore and rely on genetic studies which demonstrate that Palestinian DNA is overwhelmingly indigenous to the area.

No kidding? So, you're claiming the xtian Crusaders have "Pal'istanian DNA"? I hadn't realized that Pal'istanians were a specific race/ethnicity.

Interesting what one can learn from the prayer leader at your madrassah.

 

[rylah]

Your comment is out of the Hasbara playbook, you are following it to the letter. This is used as part of the Palestinian delegitimization process the Hasbara has in place. When the "a land without a people" meme proved impossible to defend, Zionist propaganda began tilting towards claiming that the inhabitants living in Palestine were somehow, from elsewhere. Of course, that is also difficult to defend because there have always been people in Palestine.

Those tribal and geographical surnames are in themselves fake assertions, part of the Hasbara propaganda machine. As far as what a Hamas leader states, I would ignore and rely on genetic studies which demonstrate that Palestinian DNA is overwhelmingly indigenous to the area.

So "indigenous people who stayed in one place for centuries" all of a sudden began taking surnames of other geographical places.
How so, for what purpose? Is there anyone with the surname "Filastini"?
Maybe we can find a Cohen among them...

 

[Rehmani]

Holy change of topic, Batman!

But I suppose it is for the best that this thread come to an end. After 266 pages, there has been not one shred of evidence or legal argument or reasonable explanation for the prohibition of the Jewish people to form a state.

Rehmani, I'm not entirely sure about your point on this thread. On the surface, it appears to be a rather silly discussion about the names of G-d. Silly because both Judaism and Islam have many names for G-d (or more correctly the attributes G-d manifests to humanity). The concept of G-d, I'm sure we will both agree, is one that is larger than can be encompassed with human language. He can not be fully understood, let alone described, and we must be careful not confuse the descriptions we use for Him with His actuality. The words and terms we use are useful in understanding and discussing Her Nature, but are not Her. The term "G-d" is nothing more than an English language way of conveying an idea. When conversing in English, with people who are not Hebrew speakers, its seems courteous to use English terms, rather than one of the many Hebrew words which may not have meaning to those who don't speak Hebrew. I, personally, choose to use the form G-d as a reminder that I must be conscious of the entirety of the concept when writing and not limit G-d by the words I am using. Its a little jolt to remind me of the sanctity.

That said, while I find your desire to "unite" the Jewish people with other people (notably in your conversations, Christians and Muslims), I find your methods and communications and the ideology behind it problematic (and I'm being exceedingly polite and generous with that term). You seem to conceive of unity as being conformity and that non-conformity is evidence of some sort of inherent or intentional wickedness. Sadly, I believe this ideology to be endemic in the Muslim world and I believe it is harmful in the extreme, no matter how politely it is phrased, and frankly, you do not come off as polite, but as condescending and rude and vaguely threatening in an 'or else!' kind of way. At its foundation, it places the Jewish people as "outside" or separated from humanity. And then applies a veneer of treacherous intent to it.

Oddly enough, in a way, this brings us back to the topic of the thread. I think this is the foundation from which people develop, argue and justify holding different standards for the Jewish people, and by extension, Israel. And why we end up with threads like this one, where people hold the idea that a State for the Jewish people has no legal right to exist.

Very simple From Abraham PBUH to Moses,Jesus and Mohammad PBUH they all use for God Alla or Allah if we all follow them it will show some kind of unity.

No they didn't. Find one 'Alla' in the Torah.
Noone was a Muslim before Your prophet, this claim only exists in the Koran.

Yes they did. Because they were all Arab.

 

[Rehmani]

Rehmani

What is the purpose of "unity"?

Now I will say, you are right now this thread should end.

 

[ForeverYoung436]

Holy change of topic, Batman!

But I suppose it is for the best that this thread come to an end. After 266 pages, there has been not one shred of evidence or legal argument or reasonable explanation for the prohibition of the Jewish people to form a state.

Rehmani, I'm not entirely sure about your point on this thread. On the surface, it appears to be a rather silly discussion about the names of G-d. Silly because both Judaism and Islam have many names for G-d (or more correctly the attributes G-d manifests to humanity). The concept of G-d, I'm sure we will both agree, is one that is larger than can be encompassed with human language. He can not be fully understood, let alone described, and we must be careful not confuse the descriptions we use for Him with His actuality. The words and terms we use are useful in understanding and discussing Her Nature, but are not Her. The term "G-d" is nothing more than an English language way of conveying an idea. When conversing in English, with people who are not Hebrew speakers, its seems courteous to use English terms, rather than one of the many Hebrew words which may not have meaning to those who don't speak Hebrew. I, personally, choose to use the form G-d as a reminder that I must be conscious of the entirety of the concept when writing and not limit G-d by the words I am using. Its a little jolt to remind me of the sanctity.

That said, while I find your desire to "unite" the Jewish people with other people (notably in your conversations, Christians and Muslims), I find your methods and communications and the ideology behind it problematic (and I'm being exceedingly polite and generous with that term). You seem to conceive of unity as being conformity and that non-conformity is evidence of some sort of inherent or intentional wickedness. Sadly, I believe this ideology to be endemic in the Muslim world and I believe it is harmful in the extreme, no matter how politely it is phrased, and frankly, you do not come off as polite, but as condescending and rude and vaguely threatening in an 'or else!' kind of way. At its foundation, it places the Jewish people as "outside" or separated from humanity. And then applies a veneer of treacherous intent to it.

Oddly enough, in a way, this brings us back to the topic of the thread. I think this is the foundation from which people develop, argue and justify holding different standards for the Jewish people, and by extension, Israel. And why we end up with threads like this one, where people hold the idea that a State for the Jewish people has no legal right to exist.

Very simple From Abraham PBUH to Moses,Jesus and Mohammad PBUH they all use for God Alla or Allah if we all follow them it will show some kind of unity.

No they didn't. Find one 'Alla' in the Torah.
Noone was a Muslim before Your prophet, this claim only exists in the Koran.

Yes they did. Because they were all Arab.

How old are you? You can't be more than 12, considering your level of maturity. Shusha wrote a whole thesis trying to explain some basic terms about the Names of Hashem, and you counter with an infantile response. It is true that El and Allah are similar Names for Hashem. And it's also true that Christians call Him Gd, and encompass the trinity in that concept, which Jews and Muslims do not accept. You are just using this silly semantic game to show your opinion that Jews are children of the devil. Grow up!

 

[Rehmani]

Holy change of topic, Batman!

But I suppose it is for the best that this thread come to an end. After 266 pages, there has been not one shred of evidence or legal argument or reasonable explanation for the prohibition of the Jewish people to form a state.

Rehmani, I'm not entirely sure about your point on this thread. On the surface, it appears to be a rather silly discussion about the names of G-d. Silly because both Judaism and Islam have many names for G-d (or more correctly the attributes G-d manifests to humanity). The concept of G-d, I'm sure we will both agree, is one that is larger than can be encompassed with human language. He can not be fully understood, let alone described, and we must be careful not confuse the descriptions we use for Him with His actuality. The words and terms we use are useful in understanding and discussing Her Nature, but are not Her. The term "G-d" is nothing more than an English language way of conveying an idea. When conversing in English, with people who are not Hebrew speakers, its seems courteous to use English terms, rather than one of the many Hebrew words which may not have meaning to those who don't speak Hebrew. I, personally, choose to use the form G-d as a reminder that I must be conscious of the entirety of the concept when writing and not limit G-d by the words I am using. Its a little jolt to remind me of the sanctity.

That said, while I find your desire to "unite" the Jewish people with other people (notably in your conversations, Christians and Muslims), I find your methods and communications and the ideology behind it problematic (and I'm being exceedingly polite and generous with that term). You seem to conceive of unity as being conformity and that non-conformity is evidence of some sort of inherent or intentional wickedness. Sadly, I believe this ideology to be endemic in the Muslim world and I believe it is harmful in the extreme, no matter how politely it is phrased, and frankly, you do not come off as polite, but as condescending and rude and vaguely threatening in an 'or else!' kind of way. At its foundation, it places the Jewish people as "outside" or separated from humanity. And then applies a veneer of treacherous intent to it.

Oddly enough, in a way, this brings us back to the topic of the thread. I think this is the foundation from which people develop, argue and justify holding different standards for the Jewish people, and by extension, Israel. And why we end up with threads like this one, where people hold the idea that a State for the Jewish people has no legal right to exist.

Very simple From Abraham PBUH to Moses,Jesus and Mohammad PBUH they all use for God Alla or Allah if we all follow them it will show some kind of unity.

No they didn't. Find one 'Alla' in the Torah.
Noone was a Muslim before Your prophet, this claim only exists in the Koran.

Yes they did. Because they were all Arab.

How old are you? You can't be more than 12, considering your level of maturity. Shusha wrote a whole thesis trying to explain some basic terms about the Names of Hashem, and you counter with an infantile response. It is true that El and Allah are similar Names for Hashem. And it's also true that Christians call Him Gd, and encompass the trinity in that concept, which Jews and Muslims do not accept. You are just using this silly semantic game to show your opinion that Jews are children of the devil. Grow up!

Ok tomorrow I will ask to your Jew Rabbi.

 

[MJB12741]

Your comment is out of the Hasbara playbook, you are following it to the letter. This is used as part of the Palestinian delegitimization process the Hasbara has in place. When the "a land without a people" meme proved impossible to defend, Zionist propaganda began tilting towards claiming that the inhabitants living in Palestine were somehow, from elsewhere. Of course, that is also difficult to defend because there have always been people in Palestine.

Those tribal and geographical surnames are in themselves fake assertions, part of the Hasbara propaganda machine. As far as what a Hamas leader states, I would ignore and rely on genetic studies which demonstrate that Palestinian DNA is overwhelmingly indigenous to the area.

No kidding? So, you're claiming the xtian Crusaders have "Pal'istanian DNA"? I hadn't realized that Pal'istanians were a specific race/ethnicity.

Interesting what one can learn from the prayer leader at your madrassah.

 

[MJB12741]

Israel's History and Right to Exist - Discover the Networks

 

[member]

Holy change of topic, Batman!

But I suppose it is for the best that this thread come to an end. After 266 pages, there has been not one shred of evidence or legal argument or reasonable explanation for the prohibition of the Jewish people to form a state.

Rehmani, I'm not entirely sure about your point on this thread. On the surface, it appears to be a rather silly discussion about the names of G-d. Silly because both Judaism and Islam have many names for G-d (or more correctly the attributes G-d manifests to humanity). The concept of G-d, I'm sure we will both agree, is one that is larger than can be encompassed with human language. He can not be fully understood, let alone described, and we must be careful not confuse the descriptions we use for Him with His actuality. The words and terms we use are useful in understanding and discussing Her Nature, but are not Her. The term "G-d" is nothing more than an English language way of conveying an idea. When conversing in English, with people who are not Hebrew speakers, its seems courteous to use English terms, rather than one of the many Hebrew words which may not have meaning to those who don't speak Hebrew. I, personally, choose to use the form G-d as a reminder that I must be conscious of the entirety of the concept when writing and not limit G-d by the words I am using. Its a little jolt to remind me of the sanctity.

That said, while I find your desire to "unite" the Jewish people with other people (notably in your conversations, Christians and Muslims), I find your methods and communications and the ideology behind it problematic (and I'm being exceedingly polite and generous with that term). You seem to conceive of unity as being conformity and that non-conformity is evidence of some sort of inherent or intentional wickedness. Sadly, I believe this ideology to be endemic in the Muslim world and I believe it is harmful in the extreme, no matter how politely it is phrased, and frankly, you do not come off as polite, but as condescending and rude and vaguely threatening in an 'or else!' kind of way. At its foundation, it places the Jewish people as "outside" or separated from humanity. And then applies a veneer of treacherous intent to it.

Oddly enough, in a way, this brings us back to the topic of the thread. I think this is the foundation from which people develop, argue and justify holding different standards for the Jewish people, and by extension, Israel. And why we end up with threads like this one, where people hold the idea that a State for the Jewish people has no legal right to exist.

Very simple From Abraham PBUH to Moses,Jesus and Mohammad PBUH they all use for God Alla or Allah if we all follow them it will show some kind of unity.

No they didn't. Find one 'Alla' in the Torah.
Noone was a Muslim before Your prophet, this claim only exists in the Koran.

Yes they did. Because they were all Arab.

“please jews, let the other nations enter into the religion of Abraham PBUH and help the world become peaceful under one Allah(God) instead.”




doesn’t it .........




.....make the hairs on the back of your neck stand up… how your own brethren seem to be twisting and turning and perverting your religion and Allah’s (PBUH) (Gods’) word ?


“help the world become ‘peaceful’ under one Allah (God) instead.”


??? ….so many seem to be doing the opposite. seriously, don't you think there’s something.... wrong with them (mentally) or is there something more to it ?





Instead of ...complaining about Israel/Jews…..shouldn’t muslims be up in arms about these....




evil nutjobs hijacking your religion ?


You seem to be knowledgeable in the Quran ……….What’s with the VIOLENCE ?? it's over the top to put it mildly.




what page is that on …..? this hi-jacking….and that perverted stuff?


p.s:





…did you go to one of these ? or ....(do you go at a different time on Friday's ? just curious, i dunno?) ?

(hmmm, how many madrassa's do we have...here, on American soil).....


p.s.s:


I’m dying to know:


What #@$! page is this on ?

 

[montelatici]

Holy change of topic, Batman!

But I suppose it is for the best that this thread come to an end. After 266 pages, there has been not one shred of evidence or legal argument or reasonable explanation for the prohibition of the Jewish people to form a state.

Rehmani, I'm not entirely sure about your point on this thread. On the surface, it appears to be a rather silly discussion about the names of G-d. Silly because both Judaism and Islam have many names for G-d (or more correctly the attributes G-d manifests to humanity). The concept of G-d, I'm sure we will both agree, is one that is larger than can be encompassed with human language. He can not be fully understood, let alone described, and we must be careful not confuse the descriptions we use for Him with His actuality. The words and terms we use are useful in understanding and discussing Her Nature, but are not Her. The term "G-d" is nothing more than an English language way of conveying an idea. When conversing in English, with people who are not Hebrew speakers, its seems courteous to use English terms, rather than one of the many Hebrew words which may not have meaning to those who don't speak Hebrew. I, personally, choose to use the form G-d as a reminder that I must be conscious of the entirety of the concept when writing and not limit G-d by the words I am using. Its a little jolt to remind me of the sanctity.

That said, while I find your desire to "unite" the Jewish people with other people (notably in your conversations, Christians and Muslims), I find your methods and communications and the ideology behind it problematic (and I'm being exceedingly polite and generous with that term). You seem to conceive of unity as being conformity and that non-conformity is evidence of some sort of inherent or intentional wickedness. Sadly, I believe this ideology to be endemic in the Muslim world and I believe it is harmful in the extreme, no matter how politely it is phrased, and frankly, you do not come off as polite, but as condescending and rude and vaguely threatening in an 'or else!' kind of way. At its foundation, it places the Jewish people as "outside" or separated from humanity. And then applies a veneer of treacherous intent to it.

Oddly enough, in a way, this brings us back to the topic of the thread. I think this is the foundation from which people develop, argue and justify holding different standards for the Jewish people, and by extension, Israel. And why we end up with threads like this one, where people hold the idea that a State for the Jewish people has no legal right to exist.

Very simple From Abraham PBUH to Moses,Jesus and Mohammad PBUH they all use for God Alla or Allah if we all follow them it will show some kind of unity.

No they didn't. Find one 'Alla' in the Torah.
Noone was a Muslim before Your prophet, this claim only exists in the Koran.

Yes they did. Because they were all Arab.

“please jews, let the other nations enter into the religion of Abraham PBUH and help the world become peaceful under one Allah(God) instead.”




doesn’t it .........




.....make the hairs on the back of your neck stand up… how your own brethren seem to be twisting and turning and perverting your religion and Allah’s (PBUH) (Gods’) word ?


“help the world become ‘peaceful’ under one Allah (God) instead.”


??? ….so many seem to be doing the opposite. seriously, don't you think there’s something.... wrong with them (mentally) or is there something more to it ?





Instead of ...complaining about Israel/Jews…..shouldn’t muslims be up in arms about these....




evil nutjobs hijacking your religion ?


You seem to be knowledgeable in the Quran ……….What’s with the VIOLENCE ?? it's over the top to put it mildly.




what page is that on …..? this hi-jacking….and that perverted stuff?


p.s:





…did you go to one of these ? or ....(do you go at a different time on Friday's ? just curious, i dunno?) ?

(hmmm, how many madrassa's do we have...here, on American soil).....


p.s.s:


I’m dying to know:


What #@$! page is this on ?

Why would I go to a Madrasa? I did attend Catechism on Thursdays. Does that help?

 

[member]

Holy change of topic, Batman!

But I suppose it is for the best that this thread come to an end. After 266 pages, there has been not one shred of evidence or legal argument or reasonable explanation for the prohibition of the Jewish people to form a state.

Rehmani, I'm not entirely sure about your point on this thread. On the surface, it appears to be a rather silly discussion about the names of G-d. Silly because both Judaism and Islam have many names for G-d (or more correctly the attributes G-d manifests to humanity). The concept of G-d, I'm sure we will both agree, is one that is larger than can be encompassed with human language. He can not be fully understood, let alone described, and we must be careful not confuse the descriptions we use for Him with His actuality. The words and terms we use are useful in understanding and discussing Her Nature, but are not Her. The term "G-d" is nothing more than an English language way of conveying an idea. When conversing in English, with people who are not Hebrew speakers, its seems courteous to use English terms, rather than one of the many Hebrew words which may not have meaning to those who don't speak Hebrew. I, personally, choose to use the form G-d as a reminder that I must be conscious of the entirety of the concept when writing and not limit G-d by the words I am using. Its a little jolt to remind me of the sanctity.

That said, while I find your desire to "unite" the Jewish people with other people (notably in your conversations, Christians and Muslims), I find your methods and communications and the ideology behind it problematic (and I'm being exceedingly polite and generous with that term). You seem to conceive of unity as being conformity and that non-conformity is evidence of some sort of inherent or intentional wickedness. Sadly, I believe this ideology to be endemic in the Muslim world and I believe it is harmful in the extreme, no matter how politely it is phrased, and frankly, you do not come off as polite, but as condescending and rude and vaguely threatening in an 'or else!' kind of way. At its foundation, it places the Jewish people as "outside" or separated from humanity. And then applies a veneer of treacherous intent to it.

Oddly enough, in a way, this brings us back to the topic of the thread. I think this is the foundation from which people develop, argue and justify holding different standards for the Jewish people, and by extension, Israel. And why we end up with threads like this one, where people hold the idea that a State for the Jewish people has no legal right to exist.

Very simple From Abraham PBUH to Moses,Jesus and Mohammad PBUH they all use for God Alla or Allah if we all follow them it will show some kind of unity.

No they didn't. Find one 'Alla' in the Torah.
Noone was a Muslim before Your prophet, this claim only exists in the Koran.

Yes they did. Because they were all Arab.

“please jews, let the other nations enter into the religion of Abraham PBUH and help the world become peaceful under one Allah(God) instead.”




doesn’t it .........




.....make the hairs on the back of your neck stand up… how your own brethren seem to be twisting and turning and perverting your religion and Allah’s (PBUH) (Gods’) word ?


“help the world become ‘peaceful’ under one Allah (God) instead.”


??? ….so many seem to be doing the opposite. seriously, don't you think there’s something.... wrong with them (mentally) or is there something more to it ?





Instead of ...complaining about Israel/Jews…..shouldn’t muslims be up in arms about these....




evil nutjobs hijacking your religion ?


You seem to be knowledgeable in the Quran ……….What’s with the VIOLENCE ?? it's over the top to put it mildly.




what page is that on …..? this hi-jacking….and that perverted stuff?


p.s:





…did you go to one of these ? or ....(do you go at a different time on Friday's ? just curious, i dunno?) ?

(hmmm, how many madrassa's do we have...here, on American soil).....


p.s.s:


I’m dying to know:


What #@$! page is this on ?

Why would I go to a Madrasa? I did attend Catechism on Thursdays. Does that help?

i asked you in another post if you were a practicing muslim...you didn't answer...unless i missed it ??

how come you can't come right out with it ? .........so ...you used to go to church ?

how come....it's taking forever to a @#!$ straight answer...........

or..........you don't have to be any of the above - but, still - it's.... (you're) confusing ?

you forget ...."dhimwit." remember?

 

[member]

Holy change of topic, Batman!

But I suppose it is for the best that this thread come to an end. After 266 pages, there has been not one shred of evidence or legal argument or reasonable explanation for the prohibition of the Jewish people to form a state.

Rehmani, I'm not entirely sure about your point on this thread. On the surface, it appears to be a rather silly discussion about the names of G-d. Silly because both Judaism and Islam have many names for G-d (or more correctly the attributes G-d manifests to humanity). The concept of G-d, I'm sure we will both agree, is one that is larger than can be encompassed with human language. He can not be fully understood, let alone described, and we must be careful not confuse the descriptions we use for Him with His actuality. The words and terms we use are useful in understanding and discussing Her Nature, but are not Her. The term "G-d" is nothing more than an English language way of conveying an idea. When conversing in English, with people who are not Hebrew speakers, its seems courteous to use English terms, rather than one of the many Hebrew words which may not have meaning to those who don't speak Hebrew. I, personally, choose to use the form G-d as a reminder that I must be conscious of the entirety of the concept when writing and not limit G-d by the words I am using. Its a little jolt to remind me of the sanctity.

That said, while I find your desire to "unite" the Jewish people with other people (notably in your conversations, Christians and Muslims), I find your methods and communications and the ideology behind it problematic (and I'm being exceedingly polite and generous with that term). You seem to conceive of unity as being conformity and that non-conformity is evidence of some sort of inherent or intentional wickedness. Sadly, I believe this ideology to be endemic in the Muslim world and I believe it is harmful in the extreme, no matter how politely it is phrased, and frankly, you do not come off as polite, but as condescending and rude and vaguely threatening in an 'or else!' kind of way. At its foundation, it places the Jewish people as "outside" or separated from humanity. And then applies a veneer of treacherous intent to it.

Oddly enough, in a way, this brings us back to the topic of the thread. I think this is the foundation from which people develop, argue and justify holding different standards for the Jewish people, and by extension, Israel. And why we end up with threads like this one, where people hold the idea that a State for the Jewish people has no legal right to exist.

Very simple From Abraham PBUH to Moses,Jesus and Mohammad PBUH they all use for God Alla or Allah if we all follow them it will show some kind of unity.

No they didn't. Find one 'Alla' in the Torah.
Noone was a Muslim before Your prophet, this claim only exists in the Koran.

Yes they did. Because they were all Arab.

“please jews, let the other nations enter into the religion of Abraham PBUH and help the world become peaceful under one Allah(God) instead.”




doesn’t it .........




.....make the hairs on the back of your neck stand up… how your own brethren seem to be twisting and turning and perverting your religion and Allah’s (PBUH) (Gods’) word ?


“help the world become ‘peaceful’ under one Allah (God) instead.”


??? ….so many seem to be doing the opposite. seriously, don't you think there’s something.... wrong with them (mentally) or is there something more to it ?





Instead of ...complaining about Israel/Jews…..shouldn’t muslims be up in arms about these....




evil nutjobs hijacking your religion ?


You seem to be knowledgeable in the Quran ……….What’s with the VIOLENCE ?? it's over the top to put it mildly.




what page is that on …..? this hi-jacking….and that perverted stuff?


p.s:





…did you go to one of these ? or ....(do you go at a different time on Friday's ? just curious, i dunno?) ?

(hmmm, how many madrassa's do we have...here, on American soil).....


p.s.s:


I’m dying to know:


What #@$! page is this on ?

Why would I go to a Madrasa? I did attend Catechism on Thursdays. Does that help?

p.s: that wasn't your post i was quoting...that was...Raja Rehamini

i was talkin to Rehminni....(unless...that's you as well)

 

[montelatici]

No, I am not Rehmini. Pardon the intrusion.

 

[member]

No, I am not Rehmini. Pardon the intrusion.

ok...





...not like those..."guys on motorcycles" by the paki/afghani border, eh ? you know which GUYS i ean right.....he looks like he'll enjoy his ride. cool.

 

[Shusha]

Rehmani

What is the purpose of "unity"?

Now I will say, you are right now this thread should end.

And why is that? See you think its an odd question, but I'm quite serious about asking it. There could be lots of reasons why "unity" would be a good thing. Anything from, "because G-d says so" to "because it would bring peace" to "because respect for one's neighbor is the ultimate measure of human interaction".

See, I suspect when you say "unity", you mean conversion.

 

[Deleted member 61768]

A great source of information on Israel is Jewish Virtual Library - Israel Wing

 

[Rehmani]

Rehmani

What is the purpose of "unity"?

Now I will say, you are right now this thread should end.

And why is that? See you think its an odd question, but I'm quite serious about asking it. There could be lots of reasons why "unity" would be a good thing. Anything from, "because G-d says so" to "because it would bring peace" to "because respect for one's neighbor is the ultimate measure of human interaction".

See, I suspect when you say "unity", you mean conversion.

Regardless, Jew, Christian and Muslim all Prophets used word Ala in Hebrew and Allah in Arabic. If we able to use this word Ala or Allah at least we are agreed on one word despite differences and this one word will help us to be unite by the grace of Ala or Allah.