Israel's Legal Borders Under International Law

[P F Tinmore]

He doesn’t believe Israel should exist so Israel shouldn’t have borders

Well, to be fair to Tinmore and an accurate representation of his claims, he doesn't believe Israel does exist.

If that’s the case Israel doesn’t have to abide by “ International Law”

Is that why it doesn't?

 

[P F Tinmore]

Over & over again the Pali's & their supporters try to make a case of Israeli occupation under international law. So just what are the facts? Live & learn.

Israel's Legal Borders under International Law | Facts about Israel

This guy contradicts himself to prove his lies.

Explain.

You can't tell where he contradicts himself? Did you actually read it?

 

[Shusha]

Over & over again the Pali's & their supporters try to make a case of Israeli occupation under international law. So just what are the facts? Live & learn.

Israel's Legal Borders under International Law | Facts about Israel

This guy contradicts himself to prove his lies.

Explain.

You can't tell where he contradicts himself? Did you actually read it?

I'm asking for your opinion.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Over & over again the Pali's & their supporters try to make a case of Israeli occupation under international law. So just what are the facts? Live & learn.

Israel's Legal Borders under International Law | Facts about Israel

This guy contradicts himself to prove his lies.

Explain.

You can't tell where he contradicts himself? Did you actually read it?

I'm asking for your opinion.

He says that the Jews got all of the land from the Mandates. He also says that Resolution 181 was invalid.

So, why did the Zionists accept half of Palestine, in an invalid resolution, when they received the whole pie 30 years earlier.

There are more, but he bounces around like a football trying to make his case.

 

[USAF 2023]

He doesn’t believe Israel should exist so Israel shouldn’t have borders

Well, to be fair to Tinmore and an accurate representation of his claims, he doesn't believe Israel does exist.

If that’s the case Israel doesn’t have to abide by “ International Law”

Is that why it doesn't?

If it doesn’t exist they don’t have to follow “ International Law” so I guess you’re right. The Arabs didn’t feel “ International Law” applied to them in 67; Israel doesn’t have to abide by it now

 

[P F Tinmore]

He doesn’t believe Israel should exist so Israel shouldn’t have borders

Well, to be fair to Tinmore and an accurate representation of his claims, he doesn't believe Israel does exist.

If that’s the case Israel doesn’t have to abide by “ International Law”

Is that why it doesn't?

If it doesn’t exist they don’t have to follow “ International Law” so I guess you’re right. The Arabs didn’t feel “ International Law” applied to them in 67; Israel doesn’t have to abide by it now

What international law did the Palestinians violate in '67?

 

[USAF 2023]

He doesn’t believe Israel should exist so Israel shouldn’t have borders

Well, to be fair to Tinmore and an accurate representation of his claims, he doesn't believe Israel does exist.

If that’s the case Israel doesn’t have to abide by “ International Law”

Is that why it doesn't?

If it doesn’t exist they don’t have to follow “ International Law” so I guess you’re right. The Arabs didn’t feel “ International Law” applied to them in 67; Israel doesn’t have to abide by it now

What international law did the Palestinians violate in '67?

The territories were part of those who waged War against Israel. It’s that simple. Israel is never going to be deprived of access to their Holy Sites again

 

[P F Tinmore]

Well, to be fair to Tinmore and an accurate representation of his claims, he doesn't believe Israel does exist.

If that’s the case Israel doesn’t have to abide by “ International Law”

Is that why it doesn't?

If it doesn’t exist they don’t have to follow “ International Law” so I guess you’re right. The Arabs didn’t feel “ International Law” applied to them in 67; Israel doesn’t have to abide by it now

What international law did the Palestinians violate in '67?

The territories were part of those who waged War against Israel. It’s that simple. Israel is never going to be deprived of access to their Holy Sites again

You are ducking my question.

 

[Shusha]

What international law did the Palestinians violate in '67?

Supporting a hostile invasion by foreign States.

 

[Shusha]

So, why did the Zionists accept half of Palestine, in an invalid resolution...

Because Jews are nice.

 

[USAF 2023]

If that’s the case Israel doesn’t have to abide by “ International Law”

Is that why it doesn't?

If it doesn’t exist they don’t have to follow “ International Law” so I guess you’re right. The Arabs didn’t feel “ International Law” applied to them in 67; Israel doesn’t have to abide by it now

What international law did the Palestinians violate in '67?

The territories were part of those who waged War against Israel. It’s that simple. Israel is never going to be deprived of access to their Holy Sites again

You are ducking my question.

No I’m not. The land was under Jordanian and Egyptian control and Israel won it fair and square. You are ducking my comment; Israel’s most sacred Holy places are in East Jerusalem and Israel will never be denied access to them again.

 

[Ria_Longhorn]

All of Palestine was allocated to the Jewish People with the San Remo Resolution on April 25, 1920 at the San Remo Peace Conference. The Arabs have civil and religious rights -- not political rights.

 

[P F Tinmore]

All of Palestine was allocated to the Jewish People with the San Remo Resolution on April 25, 1920 at the San Remo Peace Conference. The Arabs have civil and religious rights -- not political rights.

Who told you that?

 

[MJB12741]

All of Palestine was allocated to the Jewish People with the San Remo Resolution on April 25, 1920 at the San Remo Peace Conference. The Arabs have civil and religious rights -- not political rights.

Who told you that?

Hey I have an idea. Think like a Palestinian. Lets blame Israel for Sykes-Pico.

A century on: Why Arabs resent Sykes-Picot

 

[Ria_Longhorn]

All of Palestine was allocated to the Jewish People with the San Remo Resolution on April 25, 1920 at the San Remo Peace Conference. The Arabs have civil and religious rights -- not political rights.

Who told you that?

The legal title of the Jewish People to the mandated territory of Palestine was first recognized under international law on April 24, 1920 when the Supreme Council of the Principal Allied Powers, consisting of Great Britain, France, Italy and Japan decided to approve the Balfour Declaration of November 2, 1920 (thereby giving international legal effect to its provisions) and incorporate Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations.

As a direct result of the Allied Supreme Council decision on April 24, 1920, the San Remo Resolution of April 25, 1920 -- which is the basis for the Mandate for Palestine -- the title of sovereignty over Palestine was exclusively vested in the Jewish People and not in any other nation, state or entity.

Here's the relevant paragraph of the San Remo Resolution (April 25, 1920) text:

The High Contracting Parties agree to entrust, by application of the provisions of Article 22, the administration of Palestine, within such boundaries as may be determined by the Principal Allied Powers, to a Mandatory, to be selected by the said Powers. The Mandatory will be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on the [2nd] November, 1917, by the British Government, and adopted by the other Allied Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

San Remo conference - Wikipedia

 

[P F Tinmore]

All of Palestine was allocated to the Jewish People with the San Remo Resolution on April 25, 1920 at the San Remo Peace Conference. The Arabs have civil and religious rights -- not political rights.

Who told you that?

The legal title of the Jewish People to the mandated territory of Palestine was first recognized under international law on April 24, 1920 when the Supreme Council of the Principal Allied Powers, consisting of Great Britain, France, Italy and Japan decided to approve the Balfour Declaration of November 2, 1920 (thereby giving international legal effect to its provisions) and incorporate Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations.

As a direct result of the Allied Supreme Council decision on April 24, 1920, the San Remo Resolution of April 25, 1920 -- which is the basis for the Mandate for Palestine -- the title of sovereignty over Palestine was exclusively vested in the Jewish People and not in any other nation, state or entity.

Here's the relevant paragraph of the San Remo Resolution (April 25, 1920) text:

The High Contracting Parties agree to entrust, by application of the provisions of Article 22, the administration of Palestine, within such boundaries as may be determined by the Principal Allied Powers, to a Mandatory, to be selected by the said Powers. The Mandatory will be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on the [2nd] November, 1917, by the British Government, and adopted by the other Allied Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

San Remo conference - Wikipedia

You clearly do not understand the Mandate.

 

[Shusha]

All of Palestine was allocated to the Jewish People with the San Remo Resolution on April 25, 1920 at the San Remo Peace Conference. The Arabs have civil and religious rights -- not political rights.

Who told you that?

The legal title of the Jewish People to the mandated territory of Palestine was first recognized under international law on April 24, 1920 when the Supreme Council of the Principal Allied Powers, consisting of Great Britain, France, Italy and Japan decided to approve the Balfour Declaration of November 2, 1920 (thereby giving international legal effect to its provisions) and incorporate Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations.

As a direct result of the Allied Supreme Council decision on April 24, 1920, the San Remo Resolution of April 25, 1920 -- which is the basis for the Mandate for Palestine -- the title of sovereignty over Palestine was exclusively vested in the Jewish People and not in any other nation, state or entity.

Here's the relevant paragraph of the San Remo Resolution (April 25, 1920) text:

The High Contracting Parties agree to entrust, by application of the provisions of Article 22, the administration of Palestine, within such boundaries as may be determined by the Principal Allied Powers, to a Mandatory, to be selected by the said Powers. The Mandatory will be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on the [2nd] November, 1917, by the British Government, and adopted by the other Allied Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

San Remo conference - Wikipedia

You clearly do not understand the Mandate.

You are clearly in deep denial.