Israelis Now Bombing Rafah Designated "Safe Zone" Where Civilians Have Been Pushed

Israel targets the launch sites of rockets being fired into Israel. If they're hitting "journalists" at those sites then perhaps you'd like to explain what those "journalists" are doing there in the first place? Writing stories as their Hamas pals launch rockets against civilian targets in Israel?

Just because someone writes something doesn't make them a "journalist", Billo! Hamas knows that it sounds worse to say that Israel is killing "journalists" than to say that they killed people firing rockets at Israel!

1707502823141.webp


Yeah, but they bought a $21 vest from Amazon!!!
 
Yeah, see the problem with this, is that it is impossible to "end the occupation" because the meaning of "end the occupation" is a moving target, stretching and expanding so that whatever Israel does to "end the occupation" doesn't end the accusations of occupation.

"Freedom of movement" is one such expansion. What does "freedom of movement" mean?
If someone in Gaza wants to go study in the United States, you have no ******* right in the world to stop them!

I bet you think the Warsaw Ghetto was necessary for the Nazis to keep the peace in Poland?
 
Israel targets the launch sites of rockets being fired into Israel. If they're hitting "journalists" at those sites then perhaps you'd like to explain what those "journalists" are doing there in the first place? Writing stories as their Hamas pals launch rockets against civilian targets in Israel?

Just because someone writes something doesn't make them a "journalist", Billo! Hamas knows that it sounds worse to say that Israel is killing "journalists" than to say that they killed people firing rockets at Israel!
Israel is bombing everything and everyone. They are even targeting journalist families in the WB. Hamas isn't doing this, it's Israel.

If someone is wearing a jacket that says "PRESS" on it, you cannot target that person. Israel has targeted over 80 of them.
 
Nice try! Trolls do not have content in their posts and they don't answer direct questions.

Where is the content in your post? Where is your evidence Israel is not targeting journalists?

All you can do is sling mud, because you have no defense for Israeli atrocities.
InternetTroll.jpg
 
This is genocide any way you cut it.




If the Hamas pussies try to hide in a safe zone, is Israel supposed to just toss up its hands and say, “fine. You’re safe there?”

Innocent people do get killed in war.
Enemies bombed London. We bombed Dresden. And large swaths of Japan. And we nuked a couple of cities.

War is ugly and vile and violent and horrifying. But that’s a given. The real question is why are we suddenly trying to apply modern touchy feely standards to how war is waged?
 
RE: Israelis Now Bombing Rafah Designated "Safe Zone" Where Civilians Have Been Pushed
SUBTOPIC: Disinformation and Intentional Deception
⁜→. Billo Really, et al,
BLUF:


Israel can NOT violate a Resolution that is NOT legally binding.

This comment by Bill Really is Arab Palestinian is deliberately deceptive and propagated information.

(COMMENT)

Once you scrub all the anti-Israeli and pro-Palestinian rhetoric away, there are (actually) very few binding resolutions.

Israel is a sovereign nation and is allowed to defend itself against attacks from designated terrorists.

Each attack by a Hostile Aarab Palestinian (HoAP) or legally designated Terrorist organization is a violation of "law." Protected persons
(in this case HoAP and terrorists) who commit an offense that is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power is a direct violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention (GCIV) which is part of the International Humanitarian Law (IHL). Such a violation is publishable under Article 68 of the GCIV.

View attachment 899680

Most Respectfully,
R
An occupying force cannot claim self defense. The Palestinians have every right in the world to resist the occupation of their homeland.

You are a sick puppy trying to defend Israeli atrocities. And yes, if you are in violation of the UN Charter, it doesn't matter if the resolution is binding or not. You are trying to argue semantics and I don't appreciate it!
 
Israel is bombing everything and everyone. They are even targeting journalist families in the WB. Hamas isn't doing this, it's Israel.

If someone is wearing a jacket that says "PRESS" on it, you cannot target that person. Israel has targeted over 80 of them.
Over 80 people that Hamas claims were "journalists" have supposedly been killed. Judging from Hamas' previous propaganda that number is probably half what they're saying it is and the majority of the people that were killed were fighting against Israel when it happened. Hamas uses ambulances to get fighters from one location to another. Hamas puts it's military bases beneath hospitals and schools to make it harder for the Israelis to target them. Hamas launches rockets from civilian's back yards knowing that the Israelis will target the launch site! Hamas hides behind a civilian population putting them in danger. All of these things are a direct violation of the Genevan Conference.
 
Over 80 people that Hamas claims were "journalists" have supposedly been killed. Judging from Hamas' previous propaganda that number is probably half what they're saying it is and the majority of the people that were killed were fighting against Israel when it happened. Hamas uses ambulances to get fighters from one location to another. Hamas puts it's military bases beneath hospitals and schools to make it harder for the Israelis to target them. Hamas launches rockets from civilian's back yards knowing that the Israelis will target the launch site! Hamas hides behind a civilian population putting them in danger. All of these things are a direct violation of the Genevan Conference.
Hamas isn't making that claim, the world media is.
 
So did you want to take a stab at excusing all of the myriad violations of the Geneva Conference that Hamas violates on a daily basis?

Or do you want to ignore that and just talk about how the UN hates Israel so they must be "bad"?
 
They want access into Israel so they can conduct terror attacks. If they weren't doing those then they would still have that access. There is a REASON why they don't! As soon as Israel denied them that access Hamas spent millions digging tunnels to get back into Israel and conducted more terror attacks. Yet the Palestinians STILL complain that Israel is "oppressing" them because they close the border!
YES! And ... the purpose is to erode fundamental laws understood and accepted for every nation, except Israel, such as the absolute sovereign right of a State to determine who can, and who can not, enter the State. This leads to "soft" and open borders, and eventually no borders at all. And this is how Israel's sovereignty is eroded.
 
If someone in Gaza wants to go study in the United States, you have no ******* right in the world to stop them!
Agreed. How does Israel prevent citizens of Gaza from travelling to the US?
 
So you've seen this film footage of Israelis deliberately targeting journalists wearing "PRESS" vests, Billo?

I would LOVE to see some of that...
CPJ is particularly concerned about an apparent pattern of targeting of journalists and their families by the Israeli military. In at least one case, a journalist was killed while clearly wearing press insignia in a location where no fighting was taking place. In at least two other cases, journalists reported receiving threats from Israeli officials and Israel Defense Forces officers before their family members were killed.”

 
Why do I get the feeling that Billo is going to be absent from this string for awhile? Ask him to back up his nonsense and he runs for the hills!
 
15th post
An occupying force cannot claim self defense.
See, this is another example of how international law is twisted when it comes to Israel. Rocco just pointed out the relevant law, and you bounce back with parroted bullshit like this.
The Palestinians have every right in the world to resist the occupation of their homeland.
The Arabs in Gaza have no right to commit war crimes and crimes against humanity, nor to interfere with Israel's sovereignty in Israel's sovereign territory.
 
CPJ is particularly concerned about an apparent pattern of targeting of journalists and their families by the Israeli military. In at least one case, a journalist was killed while clearly wearing press insignia in a location where no fighting was taking place. In at least two other cases, journalists reported receiving threats from Israeli officials and Israel Defense Forces officers before their family members were killed.”
Oh, you're back...but you're back without footage of Israel targeting journalists? Just more claims that they do?
 
Oh, you're back...but you're back without footage of Israel targeting journalists? Just more claims that they do?
And those claims border on farce by the way! A family member is killed in an Israeli air strike and that counts as a deliberate attack by Israel against journalists? Are you kidding me! That's absurd.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom