Israeli Police shoot un-armed 18 year old Girl

[Challenger]

Zionist has only one meaning and that is someone who believes the Jews have the right to a homeland in the M.E

The founding father of Zionism himself actively promoted a "Jewish Homeland" NOT in the ME.

Who made that up?

You don't know about the Uganda Scheme?

It's not in the Zionist re-write of history, neither is the other Jewish homeland:

Jewish Autonomous Oblast - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Given that 40% of Jewish people reside in America, it makes you wonder how many "homelands" Zionists want?

Stalin did it, now it's only 4,000 people in one city and a village.
Nothing to do with a Jewish homeland.

but You can say so about any foreign citizen and especially the arab-msulim refugees.

"According to Joseph Stalin's national policy, each of the national groups that formed the Soviet Union would receive a territory in which to pursue cultural autonomy in a socialist framework. In that sense, it also responded to two supposed threats to the Soviet state:

Judaism, which ran counter to official state policy of atheism
Zionism — the advocacy of a Jewish national state in Palestine — which countered Soviet views of nationalism.

The Soviets envisaged setting up a new "Soviet Zion", where a proletarian Jewish culture could be developed. Yiddish, rather than Hebrew, would be the national language, and literature and the arts would replace religion as the primary expression of culture.

Stalin's theory on the National Question regarded a group as a nation only if it had a territory, and since there was no Jewish territory, per se, the Jews were not a nation and did not have national rights. Jewish Communists argued that the way to solve this ideological dilemma was by creating a Jewish territory, hence the ideological motivation for the Jewish Autonomous Oblast. Politically, it was also considered desirable to create a Soviet Jewish homeland as an ideological alternative to Zionism and the theory put forward by Socialist Zionists such as Ber Borochov that the Jewish Question could be resolved by creating a Jewish territory in Palestine. Thus Birobidzhan was important for propaganda purposes as an argument against Zionism which was a rival ideology to Marxism among left-wing Jews." Jewish Autonomous Oblast - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Maybe so, but it was still a valid "homeland". Just think, if those millions of Jewish Poles and Byelorussians had moved there before June 1941, they'd all be alive and well now and there'd be no need to colonise Palestine.

 

[docmauser1]

Zionist has only one meaning and that is someone who believes the Jews have the right to a homeland in the M.E

The founding father of Zionism himself actively promoted a "Jewish Homeland" NOT in the ME.

Who made that up?

You don't know about the Uganda Scheme?

It's not in the Zionist re-write of history, neither is the other Jewish homeland: Jewish Autonomous Oblast - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Given that 40% of Jewish people reside in America, it makes you wonder how many "homelands" Zionists want?

In view of the recent and not-so-recent advances of the arab-muslim settling-squatting enterprise arab agitpropsters should shut up, unless beeing dumbass hypocrites is on their mind, of course.

 

[Challenger]

Zionist has only one meaning and that is someone who believes the Jews have the right to a homeland in the M.E

The founding father of Zionism himself actively promoted a "Jewish Homeland" NOT in the ME.

The proposition was British, Herzl supported it only publicly for simple reasons, kind of political mechanics:

"I said explicit things in my opening speech of the 6th congress,
that Uganda is not Zion and never will be Zion. About the benefits that this African proposition can give to the Zionism I couldn't say.
From the national stage You don't do politics (publicly)... those who understand had to see this."

From an interview to Reuven Breinin

But Herzl wasn't the founding father of Zionism.

Yes, a portion of British East Africa was offered by the British as homeland for the Jews to one of the founding fathers of modern zionism.

Herzl actively supported the proposal.

A delegation sent to inspect the region found a dangerous land filled with lions and other creatures. Moreover, it was sparsely populated by small bands of Maasai who were hostile to other tribes and outsiders. Sounds familiar eh!

..He only supported it to fail it and get the British to recognize Zionism.
He himself died after the 6th congress, his last word in that speech were: "If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget her cunning."

But this tactic eventually benefited the establishment of the Jewish state in Zion

A large minority of Zionists would have been happy to obtain a "homeland" anywhere in the world that would let them, especially in America or Australia Jewish Territorialist Organization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[rylah]

The founding father of Zionism himself actively promoted a "Jewish Homeland" NOT in the ME.

Who made that up?

You don't know about the Uganda Scheme?

It's not in the Zionist re-write of history, neither is the other Jewish homeland:

Jewish Autonomous Oblast - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Given that 40% of Jewish people reside in America, it makes you wonder how many "homelands" Zionists want?

Stalin did it, now it's only 4,000 people in one city and a village.
Nothing to do with a Jewish homeland.

but You can say so about any foreign citizen and especially the arab-msulim refugees.

"According to Joseph Stalin's national policy, each of the national groups that formed the Soviet Union would receive a territory in which to pursue cultural autonomy in a socialist framework. In that sense, it also responded to two supposed threats to the Soviet state:

Judaism, which ran counter to official state policy of atheism
Zionism — the advocacy of a Jewish national state in Palestine — which countered Soviet views of nationalism.

The Soviets envisaged setting up a new "Soviet Zion", where a proletarian Jewish culture could be developed. Yiddish, rather than Hebrew, would be the national language, and literature and the arts would replace religion as the primary expression of culture.

Stalin's theory on the National Question regarded a group as a nation only if it had a territory, and since there was no Jewish territory, per se, the Jews were not a nation and did not have national rights. Jewish Communists argued that the way to solve this ideological dilemma was by creating a Jewish territory, hence the ideological motivation for the Jewish Autonomous Oblast. Politically, it was also considered desirable to create a Soviet Jewish homeland as an ideological alternative to Zionism and the theory put forward by Socialist Zionists such as Ber Borochov that the Jewish Question could be resolved by creating a Jewish territory in Palestine. Thus Birobidzhan was important for propaganda purposes as an argument against Zionism which was a rival ideology to Marxism among left-wing Jews." Jewish Autonomous Oblast - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Maybe so, but it was still a valid "homeland". Just think, if those millions of Jewish Poles and Byelorussians had moved there before June 1941, they'd all be alive and well now and there'd be no need to colonise Palestine.

You forgot to ask the people themselves if they considered it 'valid' at all in a state that persecuted Jews for celebrating their holidays.

And You of course conveniently forget the Arab pogroms and the Jewish mass exodus from those countries as well.

 

[rylah]

Zionist has only one meaning and that is someone who believes the Jews have the right to a homeland in the M.E

The founding father of Zionism himself actively promoted a "Jewish Homeland" NOT in the ME.

The proposition was British, Herzl supported it only publicly for simple reasons, kind of political mechanics:

"I said explicit things in my opening speech of the 6th congress,
that Uganda is not Zion and never will be Zion. About the benefits that this African proposition can give to the Zionism I couldn't say.
From the national stage You don't do politics (publicly)... those who understand had to see this."

From an interview to Reuven Breinin

But Herzl wasn't the founding father of Zionism.

Yes, a portion of British East Africa was offered by the British as homeland for the Jews to one of the founding fathers of modern zionism.

Herzl actively supported the proposal.

A delegation sent to inspect the region found a dangerous land filled with lions and other creatures. Moreover, it was sparsely populated by small bands of Maasai who were hostile to other tribes and outsiders. Sounds familiar eh!

..He only supported it to fail it and get the British to recognize Zionism.
He himself died after the 6th congress, his last word in that speech were: "If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget her cunning."

But this tactic eventually benefited the establishment of the Jewish state in Zion

A large minority of Zionists would have been happy to obtain a "homeland" anywhere in the world that would let them, especially in America or Australia Jewish Territorialist Organization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

'Would have been happy'?? You clearly didn't read Your own link.

Just shows how much You're willing to distort the facts.

 

[Phoenall]

Zionist has only one meaning and that is someone who believes the Jews have the right to a homeland in the M.E

The founding father of Zionism himself actively promoted a "Jewish Homeland" NOT in the ME.

The proposition was British, Herzl supported it only publicly for simple reasons, kind of political mechanics:

"I said explicit things in my opening speech of the 6th congress,
that Uganda is not Zion and never will be Zion. About the benefits that this African proposition can give to the Zionism I couldn't say.
From the national stage You don't do politics (publicly)... those who understand had to see this."

From an interview to Reuven Breinin

But Herzl wasn't the founding father of Zionism.

Yes, a portion of British East Africa was offered by the British as homeland for the Jews to one of the founding fathers of modern zionism.

Herzl actively supported the proposal.

A delegation sent to inspect the region found a dangerous land filled with lions and other creatures. Moreover, it was sparsely populated by small bands of Maasai who were hostile to other tribes and outsiders. Sounds familiar eh!

..He only supported it to fail it and get the British to recognize Zionism.
He himself died after the 6th congress, his last word in that speech were: "If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget her cunning."

But this tactic eventually benefited the establishment of the Jewish state in Zion

A large minority of Zionists would have been happy to obtain a "homeland" anywhere in the world that would let them, especially in America or Australia Jewish Territorialist Organization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

And those nations already were a homeland to the inhabitants and would not give up any land to migrants. This left a land that had no sovereign ruler and very few indigenous people and that is what the World powers went for. Remember many of the rules and laws are very recent concepts introduced in the last 30 to 50 years and as such can not be used for what happened in 1917, 1923, 1931, 1948 or 1967. Even the concept of land won in battle being illegal came into being after Israel occupied gaza, Golan heights and the west bank

 

[westwall]

Fair enough, arrest her, try her, sentance her under due process.

Zionist solution; shoot her 10 times and watch her bleed out as a sideshow attraction for the settler scum in Hebron to gawk over.

Just another day under Zionist Israeli occupation.

Nope. That's standard practice for ANY law enforcement agency world wide. Officers are authorized to use deadly force if a knife wielder approaches to within 22 feet. The fact that she got so close shows me the Israeli police were trying to NOT shoot her. She forced them. I'm a knife fighter (well I was till I got too old) and I would be shooting the crap out of her if she approached that closely.

No it isn't. In the UK the use of lethal forced must be authorised by a senior officer and then the task is carried out by a specialist armed response unit. Please explain how standing still, refusing to remove your veil turning around and walking away is forcing the IDF to shoot you? Police have pepper spray, tasers and batons, to use against knife wielding attackers and are fully trained to deal with such situations (at least they are here). There was no justification to shoot the girl, even less to let her bleed to death while Zionist medical professionals looked on and smirked for the cameras.

Untrue. Police officers in the UK are absolutely authorized to defend themselves. Furthermore the common belief that the Bobby is unarmed is no longer true. They have the choice to be armed if they wish. How is it possible you don't know this?

Where did I say they weren't allowed to defend themselves? They CANNOT use lethal force without having gain prior authorisation to do so, and then ONLY specialist firearms officers can apply that lethal force if they judge it absolutely necessary. This is how our police deal with attackers:

30 UK Police vs man armed with machete in the street.

Didn't that Muslim animal decapitate a British military officer in public on the streets of London with "just a knife" not too long ago?

Actually the poor man was an enlisted soldier and the scum used a meat cleaver.

 

[Phoenall]

Nope. That's standard practice for ANY law enforcement agency world wide. Officers are authorized to use deadly force if a knife wielder approaches to within 22 feet. The fact that she got so close shows me the Israeli police were trying to NOT shoot her. She forced them. I'm a knife fighter (well I was till I got too old) and I would be shooting the crap out of her if she approached that closely.

No it isn't. In the UK the use of lethal forced must be authorised by a senior officer and then the task is carried out by a specialist armed response unit. Please explain how standing still, refusing to remove your veil turning around and walking away is forcing the IDF to shoot you? Police have pepper spray, tasers and batons, to use against knife wielding attackers and are fully trained to deal with such situations (at least they are here). There was no justification to shoot the girl, even less to let her bleed to death while Zionist medical professionals looked on and smirked for the cameras.

Untrue. Police officers in the UK are absolutely authorized to defend themselves. Furthermore the common belief that the Bobby is unarmed is no longer true. They have the choice to be armed if they wish. How is it possible you don't know this?

Where did I say they weren't allowed to defend themselves? They CANNOT use lethal force without having gain prior authorisation to do so, and then ONLY specialist firearms officers can apply that lethal force if they judge it absolutely necessary. This is how our police deal with attackers:

30 UK Police vs man armed with machete in the street.

Didn't that Muslim animal decapitate a British military officer in public on the streets of London with "just a knife" not too long ago?

Actually the poor man was an enlisted soldier and the scum used a meat cleaver.

It took two of them being the cowards they are, and first they ran him down using a car. The people wanted a memorial but the neo Marxist do gooders refused to allow one in case in " inflamed racial tensions"

 

[Roudy]

Nope. That's standard practice for ANY law enforcement agency world wide. Officers are authorized to use deadly force if a knife wielder approaches to within 22 feet. The fact that she got so close shows me the Israeli police were trying to NOT shoot her. She forced them. I'm a knife fighter (well I was till I got too old) and I would be shooting the crap out of her if she approached that closely.

No it isn't. In the UK the use of lethal forced must be authorised by a senior officer and then the task is carried out by a specialist armed response unit. Please explain how standing still, refusing to remove your veil turning around and walking away is forcing the IDF to shoot you? Police have pepper spray, tasers and batons, to use against knife wielding attackers and are fully trained to deal with such situations (at least they are here). There was no justification to shoot the girl, even less to let her bleed to death while Zionist medical professionals looked on and smirked for the cameras.

Untrue. Police officers in the UK are absolutely authorized to defend themselves. Furthermore the common belief that the Bobby is unarmed is no longer true. They have the choice to be armed if they wish. How is it possible you don't know this?

Where did I say they weren't allowed to defend themselves? They CANNOT use lethal force without having gain prior authorisation to do so, and then ONLY specialist firearms officers can apply that lethal force if they judge it absolutely necessary. This is how our police deal with attackers:

30 UK Police vs man armed with machete in the street.

Didn't that Muslim animal decapitate a British military officer in public on the streets of London with "just a knife" not too long ago?

No. Murder of Lee Rigby - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

No as in no, you can't read?

"Adebolajo and Adebowale ran him down with a car, then used knives and a cleaver to stab and hack him to death.

The assailants, armed with a gun and cleaver, charged at the police, who fired shots that wounded them both. They were apprehended and taken to separate hospitals.[11] Adebolajo and Adebowale are British of Nigerian descent, raised as Christians, who converted to Islam. "

Animals.

 

[Roudy]

Zionist has only one meaning and that is someone who believes the Jews have the right to a homeland in the M.E

The founding father of Zionism himself actively promoted a "Jewish Homeland" NOT in the ME.

The proposition was British, Herzl supported it only publicly for simple reasons, kind of political mechanics:

"I said explicit things in my opening speech of the 6th congress,
that Uganda is not Zion and never will be Zion. About the benefits that this African proposition can give to the Zionism I couldn't say.
From the national stage You don't do politics (publicly)... those who understand had to see this."

From an interview to Reuven Breinin

But Herzl wasn't the founding father of Zionism.

Yes, a portion of British East Africa was offered by the British as homeland for the Jews to one of the founding fathers of modern zionism.

Herzl actively supported the proposal.

A delegation sent to inspect the region found a dangerous land filled with lions and other creatures. Moreover, it was sparsely populated by small bands of Maasai who were hostile to other tribes and outsiders. Sounds familiar eh!

Actively promoted, my ass.

 

[Roudy]

Zionist has only one meaning and that is someone who believes the Jews have the right to a homeland in the M.E

The founding father of Zionism himself actively promoted a "Jewish Homeland" NOT in the ME.

Who made that up?

You don't know about the Uganda Scheme?

It's not in the Zionist re-write of history, neither is the other Jewish homeland:

Jewish Autonomous Oblast - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Given that 40% of Jewish people reside in America, it makes you wonder how many "homelands" Zionists want?

They wanted one and got one, in their spiritual homeland and the land of their ancestors. How many times and countries have these fraudsters pulled a Palestine? Let's count: Israel, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, UAE, Egypt, etc.

 

[Roudy]

Zionist has only one meaning and that is someone who believes the Jews have the right to a homeland in the M.E

The founding father of Zionism himself actively promoted a "Jewish Homeland" NOT in the ME.

The proposition was British, Herzl supported it only publicly for simple reasons, kind of political mechanics:

"I said explicit things in my opening speech of the 6th congress,
that Uganda is not Zion and never will be Zion. About the benefits that this African proposition can give to the Zionism I couldn't say.
From the national stage You don't do politics (publicly)... those who understand had to see this."

From an interview to Reuven Breinin

But Herzl wasn't the founding father of Zionism.

Yes, a portion of British East Africa was offered by the British as homeland for the Jews to one of the founding fathers of modern zionism.

Herzl actively supported the proposal.

A delegation sent to inspect the region found a dangerous land filled with lions and other creatures. Moreover, it was sparsely populated by small bands of Maasai who were hostile to other tribes and outsiders. Sounds familiar eh!

..He only supported it to fail it and get the British to recognize Zionism.
He himself died after the 6th congress, his last word in that speech were: "If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget her cunning."

But this tactic eventually benefited the establishment of the Jewish state in Zion

A large minority of Zionists would have been happy to obtain a "homeland" anywhere in the world that would let them, especially in America or Australia Jewish Territorialist Organization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A large minority. Ha ha ha. Get over it, you douche, Israel has been in the hearts of the Jewish people and the center of the faith for over 4000 years. It is more sacred to the Jews than it is to any other faith.

 

[Challenger]

Who made that up?

You don't know about the Uganda Scheme?

It's not in the Zionist re-write of history, neither is the other Jewish homeland:

Jewish Autonomous Oblast - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Given that 40% of Jewish people reside in America, it makes you wonder how many "homelands" Zionists want?

Stalin did it, now it's only 4,000 people in one city and a village.
Nothing to do with a Jewish homeland.

but You can say so about any foreign citizen and especially the arab-msulim refugees.

"According to Joseph Stalin's national policy, each of the national groups that formed the Soviet Union would receive a territory in which to pursue cultural autonomy in a socialist framework. In that sense, it also responded to two supposed threats to the Soviet state:

Judaism, which ran counter to official state policy of atheism
Zionism — the advocacy of a Jewish national state in Palestine — which countered Soviet views of nationalism.

The Soviets envisaged setting up a new "Soviet Zion", where a proletarian Jewish culture could be developed. Yiddish, rather than Hebrew, would be the national language, and literature and the arts would replace religion as the primary expression of culture.

Stalin's theory on the National Question regarded a group as a nation only if it had a territory, and since there was no Jewish territory, per se, the Jews were not a nation and did not have national rights. Jewish Communists argued that the way to solve this ideological dilemma was by creating a Jewish territory, hence the ideological motivation for the Jewish Autonomous Oblast. Politically, it was also considered desirable to create a Soviet Jewish homeland as an ideological alternative to Zionism and the theory put forward by Socialist Zionists such as Ber Borochov that the Jewish Question could be resolved by creating a Jewish territory in Palestine. Thus Birobidzhan was important for propaganda purposes as an argument against Zionism which was a rival ideology to Marxism among left-wing Jews." Jewish Autonomous Oblast - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Maybe so, but it was still a valid "homeland". Just think, if those millions of Jewish Poles and Byelorussians had moved there before June 1941, they'd all be alive and well now and there'd be no need to colonise Palestine.

You forgot to ask the people themselves if they considered it 'valid' at all in a state that persecuted Jews for celebrating their holidays.

And You of course conveniently forget the Arab pogroms and the Jewish mass exodus from those countries as well.

They'd have been able to celebrate their holidays just fine in their own Oblast, as the extract says.

Well the survivors of WW2 wanted to go anywhere but Palestine, their country of choice was America, but President Truman, at Zionist urging, wouldn't let them in.

I've not forgotten anything. What happened with the Jewish populations in the Muslim world was as a direct result of Zionist ethic cleansing, along with a few clandestine Zionist operations designed to frighten Jewish populations in Muslim countries into leaving, but that wasn't at all relevant so I never mentioned it.

 

[Challenger]

The founding father of Zionism himself actively promoted a "Jewish Homeland" NOT in the ME.

The proposition was British, Herzl supported it only publicly for simple reasons, kind of political mechanics:

"I said explicit things in my opening speech of the 6th congress,
that Uganda is not Zion and never will be Zion. About the benefits that this African proposition can give to the Zionism I couldn't say.
From the national stage You don't do politics (publicly)... those who understand had to see this."

From an interview to Reuven Breinin

But Herzl wasn't the founding father of Zionism.

Yes, a portion of British East Africa was offered by the British as homeland for the Jews to one of the founding fathers of modern zionism.

Herzl actively supported the proposal.

A delegation sent to inspect the region found a dangerous land filled with lions and other creatures. Moreover, it was sparsely populated by small bands of Maasai who were hostile to other tribes and outsiders. Sounds familiar eh!

..He only supported it to fail it and get the British to recognize Zionism.
He himself died after the 6th congress, his last word in that speech were: "If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget her cunning."

But this tactic eventually benefited the establishment of the Jewish state in Zion

A large minority of Zionists would have been happy to obtain a "homeland" anywhere in the world that would let them, especially in America or Australia Jewish Territorialist Organization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A large minority. Ha ha ha. Get over it, you douche, Israel has been in the hearts of the Jewish people and the center of the faith for over 4000 years. It is more sacred to the Jews than it is to any other faith.

Wrong again Rude-ee, I think you'll find that Jerusalem was the cult centre the Jewish diaspora over the centuries. After all, there's no saying, "Next year in Israel" is there? It was always "Next year in Jerusalem" this book will explain it to you: http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Invention-Land-Israel-Homeland/dp/1844679462&tag=?tag=usmb-20

 

[Roudy]

You don't know about the Uganda Scheme?

It's not in the Zionist re-write of history, neither is the other Jewish homeland:

Jewish Autonomous Oblast - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Given that 40% of Jewish people reside in America, it makes you wonder how many "homelands" Zionists want?

Stalin did it, now it's only 4,000 people in one city and a village.
Nothing to do with a Jewish homeland.

but You can say so about any foreign citizen and especially the arab-msulim refugees.

"According to Joseph Stalin's national policy, each of the national groups that formed the Soviet Union would receive a territory in which to pursue cultural autonomy in a socialist framework. In that sense, it also responded to two supposed threats to the Soviet state:

Judaism, which ran counter to official state policy of atheism
Zionism — the advocacy of a Jewish national state in Palestine — which countered Soviet views of nationalism.

The Soviets envisaged setting up a new "Soviet Zion", where a proletarian Jewish culture could be developed. Yiddish, rather than Hebrew, would be the national language, and literature and the arts would replace religion as the primary expression of culture.

Stalin's theory on the National Question regarded a group as a nation only if it had a territory, and since there was no Jewish territory, per se, the Jews were not a nation and did not have national rights. Jewish Communists argued that the way to solve this ideological dilemma was by creating a Jewish territory, hence the ideological motivation for the Jewish Autonomous Oblast. Politically, it was also considered desirable to create a Soviet Jewish homeland as an ideological alternative to Zionism and the theory put forward by Socialist Zionists such as Ber Borochov that the Jewish Question could be resolved by creating a Jewish territory in Palestine. Thus Birobidzhan was important for propaganda purposes as an argument against Zionism which was a rival ideology to Marxism among left-wing Jews." Jewish Autonomous Oblast - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Maybe so, but it was still a valid "homeland". Just think, if those millions of Jewish Poles and Byelorussians had moved there before June 1941, they'd all be alive and well now and there'd be no need to colonise Palestine.

You forgot to ask the people themselves if they considered it 'valid' at all in a state that persecuted Jews for celebrating their holidays.

And You of course conveniently forget the Arab pogroms and the Jewish mass exodus from those countries as well.

They'd have been able to celebrate their holidays just fine in their own Oblast, as the extract says.

Well the survivors of WW2 wanted to go anywhere but Palestine, their country of choice was America, but President Truman, at Zionist urging, wouldn't let them in.

I've not forgotten anything. What happened with the Jewish populations in the Muslim world was as a direct result of Zionist ethic cleansing, along with a few clandestine Zionist operations designed to frighten Jewish populations in Muslim countries into leaving, but that wasn't at all relevant so I never mentioned it.

Wow, so many lies in two paragraphs! I think you just established the world record for most IslamoNazi lies in such a limited space. And that's a huge accomplishment since you IslamoNazi propagandists dominate the sport of lying.

 

[Roudy]

The proposition was British, Herzl supported it only publicly for simple reasons, kind of political mechanics:

"I said explicit things in my opening speech of the 6th congress,
that Uganda is not Zion and never will be Zion. About the benefits that this African proposition can give to the Zionism I couldn't say.
From the national stage You don't do politics (publicly)... those who understand had to see this."

From an interview to Reuven Breinin

But Herzl wasn't the founding father of Zionism.

Yes, a portion of British East Africa was offered by the British as homeland for the Jews to one of the founding fathers of modern zionism.

Herzl actively supported the proposal.

A delegation sent to inspect the region found a dangerous land filled with lions and other creatures. Moreover, it was sparsely populated by small bands of Maasai who were hostile to other tribes and outsiders. Sounds familiar eh!

..He only supported it to fail it and get the British to recognize Zionism.
He himself died after the 6th congress, his last word in that speech were: "If I forget thee, O Jerusalem, let my right hand forget her cunning."

But this tactic eventually benefited the establishment of the Jewish state in Zion

A large minority of Zionists would have been happy to obtain a "homeland" anywhere in the world that would let them, especially in America or Australia Jewish Territorialist Organization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A large minority. Ha ha ha. Get over it, you douche, Israel has been in the hearts of the Jewish people and the center of the faith for over 4000 years. It is more sacred to the Jews than it is to any other faith.

Wrong again Rude-ee, I think you'll find that Jerusalem was the cult centre the Jewish diaspora over the centuries. After all, there's no saying, "Next year in Israel" is there? It was always "Next year in Jerusalem" this book will explain it to you: http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Invention-Land-Israel-Homeland/dp/1844679462&tag=?tag=usmb-20

Ha ha ha. OMG. "the invention of the land of Israel". Now Israel is an invented land. I really think you should try your hand at comedy, Achmed. Don't let all this talent go to waste. You'll have standing room crowds in Gaza city, Qom, Kabul, and Karachi. Trust me.

 

[Challenger]

Now Israel is an invented land.

Yes, it is.

 

[Roudy]

Now Israel is an invented land.

Yes, it is.

No it isn't.

 

[fanger]

Oh Yes it is!

 

[Roudy]

History proves otherwise. Stop fangering yourself.