http://www.usmessageboard.com/newthread.php?do=newthread&f=30
Israeli-Palestinian peace talks had no chance, say analysts
Michele Chabin, Special for USA TODAY 1:41 p.m. EDT April 11, 2014
JERUSALEM — The Palestinian refusal to recognize Israel as a Jewish state is at the core of why a negotiated settlement between the two sides is all but dead, say experts on both sides of the divide.
What a stupid demand! Can you get any more arrogant and narcissistic?
Israel is a state. It exists. There. There's your recognition. Now move on to the next item, you little baby's.
Tell us why there should be a " Palestinian state" but not a Jewish State, You racist
Public sentiment and the positions of political leaders for the Israelis and the Palestinians indicate that neither side will bend on the issue Israel says is critical, which means peace talks pursued by U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry had little chance of working from the start.
It had little chance of working, because Israel never wanted peace in the first place.
As long as the occupation continues, there's no reason to do anything
"for" Israel.
You mean accept Borders that until now the Arabs rejected? That will never happen. Please tell us why those Borders were rejected in the first place
Israel has in the past offered compromises on hurdles such as settlements on disputed land. But the refusal by Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to concede that Israel is a Jewish state is a deal-breaker, says Steinberg.
It's not "disputed" land; it's "occupied" land and Israel needs to get the **** off it!
Never happen : You ****** ! That land was not " Palestinian" before 67 and isn't now. It was part of Jordan and Egypt. !!!
The refusal means Israel has no confidence that a Palestinian state on its border will end the decades-long attempt by Arab nations to destroy it, so there is no reason to agree to a two-state solution, he says.
If Israel wanted peace, they'd end the occupation.
That is the first step.