Israeli justice: Man Who Wouldn’t Teach ‘Rabin Legacy’ Wins NIS 400,000

[Lipush]

Well then, answer a simple question senorita: Do you support a Palestinian State to the pre-67 borders that the UN endorsed?

You mean, the solution in which the Jewish people have to give up their historic rights of Jerusalem?

There are no historical jewish rights to jerusalem. This is a canard put out by zionists who repeat it over and over as if it means anything.

NOBODY in the world believes it except jewish and xtian zionists.

NOBODY *DENIES* the connection between the Jews and Jerusalem except haters and terrorist-wannabes.

 

[Lipush]

this is getting OT.

The topic in the opening post says something very clear- The Israeli court doesn't accept that an education worker gets fired just because he expressed and opinion and acted to separate politics from the memorial day in Israeli schools.

He acts in bravery when pointing out on the hypocrisy and the dangerous process of brainwashing the minds of Israeli children based on a political murder.

THAT is the issue.

THAT is what the court agrees to.

Which is a blessed decision.

 

[docmauser1]

According to Alexander Scholch, Palestine in 1850 had about 350,000 inhabitants, 30% of whom lived in 13 towns; roughly 85% were Muslims, 11% were Christians and 4% Jews

350,000 only? In all that area? No wonder our honorable georgephillip's piling jokes up about palistanian "businesses, bank accounts" and other fun stuff, of course.

 

[pbel]

You mean, the solution in which the Jewish people have to give up their historic rights of Jerusalem?

There are no historical jewish rights to jerusalem. This is a canard put out by zionists who repeat it over and over as if it means anything.

NOBODY in the world believes it except jewish and xtian zionists.

NOBODY *DENIES* the connection between the Jews and Jerusalem except haters and terrorist-wannabes.

Only a jackass would deny that a Mosque lies on top of the mount for seven hundred years, much longer than all Jewish occupations put together.

My own wish is for peace and sharing of Jerusalem for all religions as it was before the Israeli conquest on un-armed Palestinians.

 

[docmauser1]

Only a jackass would deny that a Mosque lies on top of the mount for seven hundred years, much longer than all Jewish occupations put together.

Oh, a desecrated byzantine church of St.Mary of Justinian, bth..

 

[pbel]

Only a jackass would deny that a Mosque lies on top of the mount for seven hundred years, much longer than all Jewish occupations put together.

Oh, a desecrated byzantine church of St.Mary of Justinian, bth..

Why do Khazars with German surnames make up history?


http://orthodoxwiki.org/Church_of_St._Mary_of_Justinian_(Temple_Mount,_Jerusalem)


Byzantine historian Procopius wrote that the church was built in 560 AD and burned down by the Persians in 614. Later after the Muslim conquest of the Holy Land, this church eventually was converted into what is the present day Al-Aqsa Mosque.

The Al-Aqsa Mosque was built 20 years after the Dome of the Rock, which was built in 691-692 by Khalif Abd El Malik (the name "Omar Mosque" is therefore false). Therefore, in or around 711, or about 80 years after Mohammed died, Malik's son, Abd El-Wahd (who ruled from 705-715) reconstructed the Christian- Byzantine Church of St. Mary and converted it into a mosque. He left the structure as it was, a typical Byzantine "basilica" structure with a row of pillars on either side of the rectangular "ship" in the center. All he added was an onion-like dome on top of the building to make it look like a mosque. He then named it El-Aqsa, so it would sound like the one mentioned in the Koran.[1]

 

[Hossfly]

There are no historical jewish rights to jerusalem. This is a canard put out by zionists who repeat it over and over as if it means anything.

NOBODY in the world believes it except jewish and xtian zionists.

NOBODY *DENIES* the connection between the Jews and Jerusalem except haters and terrorist-wannabes.

Only a jackass would deny that a Mosque lies on top of the mount for seven hundred years, much longer than all Jewish occupations put together.

My own wish is for peace and sharing of Jerusalem for all religions as it was before the Israeli conquest on un-armed Palestinians.

Only a Dhimwit Jackass would not be bothered with the Muslims putting their mosques on top of the holy places of others. Talk to a few Hindus and they will tell you about the hundreds of Hindu temples which were destroyed by Muslims and mosques put on top of the sites. Whatever forum Phillip posts on, I think the intelligent viewers can figure him out real fast. Maybe the Dhimwit has no problem with the Muslims now planning to convert old churches into mosques. I am sure the viewers have noticed that Phillip never says that he wishes Muslims would have tolerance for those whose religious beliefs differ from theirs. How can there ever be peace in many locations of the world if people are being murdered for their religious beliefs? I don't think Phillip cares at all for all the "unarmed" people in the Muslim world who are being blown up in the name of a religion, not even when they are other Muslims being blown apart because of the sect to which they belong. However, it is hilarious seeing Phillip get on his high horse as if he thinks the readers are convinced he cares about the Palestinians.

 

[docmauser1]

Only a jackass would deny that a Mosque lies on top of the mount for seven hundred years, much longer than all Jewish occupations put together.

Oh, a desecrated byzantine church of St.Mary of Justinian, bth..

khazars Why do with German surnames make up history?

The magnificient me haven't met one yet, of course.

http://orthodoxwiki.org/Church_of_St._Mary_of_Justinian_(Temple_Mount,_Jerusalem)
Byzantine historian Procopius wrote that the church was built in 560 AD and burned down by the Persians in 614. Later after the Muslim conquest of the Holy Land, this church eventually was converted into what is the present day Al-Aqsa Mosque.
The Al-Aqsa Mosque was built 20 years after the Dome of the Rock, which was built in 691-692 by Khalif Abd El Malik (the name "Omar Mosque" is therefore false). Therefore, in or around 711, or about 80 years after Mohammed died, Malik's son, Abd El-Wahd (who ruled from 705-715) reconstructed the Christian- Byzantine Church of St. Mary and converted it into a mosque. He left the structure as it was, a typical Byzantine "basilica" structure with a row of pillars on either side of the rectangular "ship" in the center. All he added was an onion-like dome on top of the building to make it look like a mosque. He then named it El-Aqsa, so it would sound like the one mentioned in the Koran.[1]

And under that last "[1]" we find "All he did was some cosmetic renovations, removed Christian items and replaced the Christian stained glasses. He then named it Al-Aqsa, so it would sound like the one mentioned by the Muslims. This Mosque still looks more like a church, and there is no Mosque anywhere in this world, which looks like it. The Muslims have no shame to claim a church as their 3rd most holy mosque. Al Aqsa mosque did not exist when Muhammad died."
Kewl, isn't it?

 

[pbel]

NOBODY *DENIES* the connection between the Jews and Jerusalem except haters and terrorist-wannabes.

Only a jackass would deny that a Mosque lies on top of the mount for seven hundred years, much longer than all Jewish occupations put together.

My own wish is for peace and sharing of Jerusalem for all religions as it was before the Israeli conquest on un-armed Palestinians.

Only a Dhimwit Jackass would not be bothered with the Muslims putting their mosques on top of the holy places of others. Talk to a few Hindus and they will tell you about the hundreds of Hindu temples which were destroyed by Muslims and mosques put on top of the sites. Whatever forum Phillip posts on, I think the intelligent viewers can figure him out real fast. Maybe the Dhimwit has no problem with the Muslims now planning to convert old churches into mosques. I am sure the viewers have noticed that Phillip never says that he wishes Muslims would have tolerance for those whose religious beliefs differ from theirs. How can there ever be peace in many locations of the world if people are being murdered for their religious beliefs? I don't think Phillip cares at all for all the "unarmed" people in the Muslim world who are being blown up in the name of a religion, not even when they are other Muslims being blown apart because of the sect to which they belong. However, it is hilarious seeing Phillip get on his high horse as if he thinks the readers are convinced he cares about the Palestinians.

Hossie

He’d be coming
Down the mountain
If he could

But he fell asleep
In the outhouse
Sawing wood

Poor ‘ol Hossie
Drank too much
Hoochie

Now he’s snoring
On top of
Poopie

Or he’d be down
The mountain
Cutting wood!

 

[Lipush]

There are no historical jewish rights to jerusalem. This is a canard put out by zionists who repeat it over and over as if it means anything.

NOBODY in the world believes it except jewish and xtian zionists.

NOBODY *DENIES* the connection between the Jews and Jerusalem except haters and terrorist-wannabes.

Only a jackass would deny that a Mosque lies on top of the mount for seven hundred years, much longer than all Jewish occupations put together.

My own wish is for peace and sharing of Jerusalem for all religions as it was before the Israeli conquest on un-armed Palestinians.

That mosque is built on the ruins of our temple.

If Jerusalem is given to the Palestinians, Jews will have no freedom to worship the holy sites there.

We have seen how Jews are stoned when they wish for nothing but going and pray in the Temple Mount.

And those Radical Palestinian baboons harass, injure, and force them out.

 

[pbel]

NOBODY *DENIES* the connection between the Jews and Jerusalem except haters and terrorist-wannabes.

Only a jackass would deny that a Mosque lies on top of the mount for seven hundred years, much longer than all Jewish occupations put together.

My own wish is for peace and sharing of Jerusalem for all religions as it was before the Israeli conquest on un-armed Palestinians.

Only a Dhimwit Jackass would not be bothered with the Muslims putting their mosques on top of the holy places of others. Talk to a few Hindus and they will tell you about the hundreds of Hindu temples which were destroyed by Muslims and mosques put on top of the sites. Whatever forum Phillip posts on, I think the intelligent viewers can figure him out real fast. Maybe the Dhimwit has no problem with the Muslims now planning to convert old churches into mosques. I am sure the viewers have noticed that Phillip never says that he wishes Muslims would have tolerance for those whose religious beliefs differ from theirs. How can there ever be peace in many locations of the world if people are being murdered for their religious beliefs? I don't think Phillip cares at all for all the "unarmed" people in the Muslim world who are being blown up in the name of a religion, not even when they are other Muslims being blown apart because of the sect to which they belong. However, it is hilarious seeing Phillip get on his high horse as if he thinks the readers are convinced he cares about the Palestinians.

What is Beneath the Temple Mount? | History & Archaeology | Smithsonian Magazine

Barkay says some discoveries provide tangible evidence of biblical accounts. Fragments of terra-cotta figurines, from between the eighth and sixth centuries B.C., may support the passage in which King Josiah, who ruled during the seventh century, initiated reforms that included a campaign against idolatry. Other finds challenge long-held beliefs. For example, it is widely accepted that early Christians used the Mount as a garbage dump on the ruins of the Jewish temples. But the abundance of coins, ornamental crucifixes and fragments of columns found from Jerusalem’s Byzantine era (A.D. 380–638) suggest that some public buildings were constructed there. Barkay and his colleagues have published their main findings in two academic journals in Hebrew, and they plan to eventually publish a book-length account in English

Read more: What is Beneath the Temple Mount? | History & Archaeology | Smithsonian Magazine
Follow us: [MENTION=25239]smith[/MENTION]sonianMag on Twitter

 

[pbel]

NOBODY *DENIES* the connection between the Jews and Jerusalem except haters and terrorist-wannabes.

Only a jackass would deny that a Mosque lies on top of the mount for seven hundred years, much longer than all Jewish occupations put together.

My own wish is for peace and sharing of Jerusalem for all religions as it was before the Israeli conquest on un-armed Palestinians.

That mosque is built on the ruins of our temple.

If Jerusalem is given to the Palestinians, Jews will have no freedom to worship the holy sites there.

We have seen how Jews are stoned when they wish for nothing but going and pray in the Temple Mount.

And those Radical Palestinian baboons harass, injure, and force them out.

It should be made part of any peace deal, period.

 

[docmauser1]

"Barkay says some discoveries provide tangible evidence of biblical accounts. Fragments of terra-cotta figurines, from between the eighth and sixth centuries B.C., may support the passage in which King Josiah, who ruled during the seventh century, initiated reforms that included a campaign against idolatry. Other finds challenge long-held beliefs. For example, it is widely accepted that early Christians used the Mount as a garbage dump on the ruins of the Jewish temples. But the abundance of coins, ornamental crucifixes and fragments of columns found from Jerusalem’s Byzantine era (A.D. 380–638) suggest that some public buildings were constructed there. Barkay and his colleagues have published their main findings in two academic journals in Hebrew, and they plan to eventually publish a book-length account in English."

And no palistanians were found, of course.

 

[pbel]

"Barkay says some discoveries provide tangible evidence of biblical accounts. Fragments of terra-cotta figurines, from between the eighth and sixth centuries B.C., may support the passage in which King Josiah, who ruled during the seventh century, initiated reforms that included a campaign against idolatry. Other finds challenge long-held beliefs. For example, it is widely accepted that early Christians used the Mount as a garbage dump on the ruins of the Jewish temples. But the abundance of coins, ornamental crucifixes and fragments of columns found from Jerusalem’s Byzantine era (A.D. 380–638) suggest that some public buildings were constructed there. Barkay and his colleagues have published their main findings in two academic journals in Hebrew, and they plan to eventually publish a book-length account in English."

And no palistanians were found, of course.

They were called Muslims at the time Herr Mauser.

 

[docmauser1]

"Barkay says some discoveries provide tangible evidence of biblical accounts. Fragments of terra-cotta figurines, from between the eighth and sixth centuries B.C., may support the passage in which King Josiah, who ruled during the seventh century, initiated reforms that included a campaign against idolatry. Other finds challenge long-held beliefs. For example, it is widely accepted that early Christians used the Mount as a garbage dump on the ruins of the Jewish temples. But the abundance of coins, ornamental crucifixes and fragments of columns found from Jerusalem’s Byzantine era (A.D. 380–638) suggest that some public buildings were constructed there. Barkay and his colleagues have published their main findings in two academic journals in Hebrew, and they plan to eventually publish a book-length account in English."

And no palistanians were found, of course.

They were called Muslims at the time Herr Mauser.

Whatevah.