Israeli Foreign Policy

Right. Germany supplied Israel with their fleet of six Dolphin-class submarines, the world's most advanced diesel submarines that were designed from the get-go to accommodate Israel's long-range Popeye nuclear cruise missiles, any one of which could level Tehran, Damascus, or Baghdad. I'd hardly call that non-intervention on the part of the Germans.

What are those subs doing these days?

They do what Armageddon machines always do, they lurk.
 
Yes. But its worth looking at any 'mysterious sinkings' in the region.

Didn't a ship go down recently filled with Palestinians trying to go from Egypt to Europe?
The story put out was that it was deliberately sunk by the human traffickers.

The human traffickers have not been asked to give their side, apparently.
 
There is also an on-going influx as Israel's racist immigration policies causes it to try to bring as many Jews in as it can.

The way you wrote this it makes it sound like you believe it to be a bad thing.

And there is the dilemma. To grow individual and family wealth in a system which is spreading the same resources, land, housing, water, jobs over increasing numbers of people leads to great risks for the poorer. And probably for much of the middle classes.

And this doesn't apply to the United States because . . . . ?

It is well known that few people will break out of a structure given to them as Approved Reality. The propaganda of the Racist Israeli State says that violent suppression and unequal application of law is an Israeli Right, because Jews are more valuable than non-Jews.

Your son is dying and some African in Africa that you don't even know is also dying. Who are you going to save? Surely you wouldn't be so racist as to save your son unconditionally?

Zionism's leadership learned from Germany that the 'Master Race' message is really very hypnotic, and have used it ruthlessly to control their population.

Are you insane? No nation has a greater obligation to foreigners than it does to it's own citizens.
 
Right. Germany supplied Israel with their fleet of six Dolphin-class submarines, the world's most advanced diesel submarines that were designed from the get-go to accommodate Israel's long-range Popeye nuclear cruise missiles, any one of which could level Tehran, Damascus, or Baghdad. I'd hardly call that non-intervention on the part of the Germans.

What are those subs doing these days?

I think just 4 are delivered. Probably two operational, and the others in training mode / sea trials.
Likely that they have one on patrol spying on stuff in the Red Sea, and basically, getting some practice in.
Of course, if they have been able to, they will be armed with nukes, waiting for the call to turn Berlin, London and Paris into glass.

Five have been delivered and there is no "if they have been able to" speculation regarding their nuclear missile capability. The Popeye nuclear missile aft launch tube is unique. Israel's ambiguity regarding their nuclear weapons arsenal seems almost quaint at this point in the game, silly in fact. Your post is silly as well. Why would Israel want to nuke London, Paris, or Berlin? England and France both possess boomers, themselves capable of annihilating every living thing in Israel in about 20 minutes flat. If Israel uses these things, it'll be against Iran.
 
I agree there will be a priority list, and we are not at the top.
But we are on it.

Why would you think we are not? Israel sees everyone as an enemy, and an asset. To use an asset you need to get a hold over it. The Sampson Option is one way to encourage those with any power to not let Israel fail.

I don't know of these boomers of which you speak. The UK has no independent nuclear weapon, as Trident is entirely dependent on US GPS. They switch the codes, and it instantly stops working.

In any case, if Israel was going down, there would be little 'Israel' left to bomb.

For someone who can say sensible things your last post was pretty stupid Tom.
 
Last edited:
Israelis elect people they believe can protect them from the inbred, genocidal savages who wish to destroy them. Facing a continuous existential threat has created a sort of siege mentality where security comes first and foremost.

Should the Arabs ever abandon their genocidal ambitions, I'm sure the leadership of Israel would reflect concerns other than security.
 
I personally voted for the Likud.
Your whole assumptions are wrong, Israel have good affairs with most of the states you listed, thing is not everybody willing to openly pick a side and seal the consequences of their own state except for the Arab states(most of them) this is indeed a huge issue to discuss but your base assumption is wrong so you may want to think about it based on the new information I gave you.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom