Israeli Apartheid

RE: Israeli Apartheid
SUBTOPIC: Survey
The project was initiated in early 2021
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

While the headline extension reads "Nearly two-thirds of our recent survey group think the Israeli-Palestinian situation is akin to apartheid" → the Survey (which initially contacted 1290 experts) only had 557 respondents. That means that more than half did not give consider the survey worthy of a response. Or put another way only ≈ 240 respondents of the original 1290 surveyed "think the Israeli-Palestinian situation is akin to apartheid."

These stats can be mixed, twisted, or presented in any way they want, in order to support the impression they want to give.

Analysis by
Professors Marc Lynch, GWU and Shibley Telhami, UofM • September 17, 2021
◈ Dr Lynch He is the founder and director of the Project on Middle East Political Science
◈ Dr Telhami is a former Special Envoy for Middle East Peace (2009-2011) and as a member of the US delegation to the Trilateral US-Israeli-Palestinian Anti-Incitement Committee

Academic experts believe that Middle East politics are actually getting worse

(COMMENT)
.
There is no current investigation underway by the UN International Criminal Court (ICC) concerning allegations of Apartheid. This suggestions that the UN ICC is - or - has pursued such an action is old news (more than a year old.

On 3 MAR 2021: The ICC opened a investigation concerning Crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court that are alleged to have been committed in the Situation since 13 June 2014, the date to which reference is made in the Referral of the Situation to the Office of the Prosecutor. This is an open ended investigation. The investigation covers both the actions of the Israelis and the actions of the Palestinians. This is an open-ended processes with no end date. It may close tomorrow or it may never close.

And important point the "survey of experts" did not make clear is that the International Criminal Code stipulates that:


The definition of a crime shall be strictly construed and shall not be extended by analogy. In case of ambiguity, the definition shall be interpreted in favour of the person being investigated, prosecuted or convicted.​

For the life of me, I cannot explain the tumultuous response is all about.
.
1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 
RE: Israeli Apartheid
SUBTOPIC: Survey
The project was initiated in early 2021
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

While the headline extension reads "Nearly two-thirds of our recent survey group think the Israeli-Palestinian situation is akin to apartheid" → the Survey (which initially contacted 1290 experts) only had 557 respondents. That means that more than half did not give consider the survey worthy of a response. Or put another way only ≈ 240 respondents of the original 1290 surveyed "think the Israeli-Palestinian situation is akin to apartheid."

These stats can be mixed, twisted, or presented in any way they want, in order to support the impression they want to give.

Analysis by
Professors Marc Lynch, GWU and Shibley Telhami, UofM • September 17, 2021
◈ Dr Lynch He is the founder and director of the Project on Middle East Political Science
◈ Dr Telhami is a former Special Envoy for Middle East Peace (2009-2011) and as a member of the US delegation to the Trilateral US-Israeli-Palestinian Anti-Incitement Committee

(COMMENT)
.
There is no current investigation underway by the UN International Criminal Court (ICC) concerning allegations of Apartheid. This suggestions that the UN ICC is - or - has pursued such an action is old news (more than a year old.

On 3 MAR 2021: The ICC opened a investigation concerning Crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court that are alleged to have been committed in the Situation since 13 June 2014, the date to which reference is made in the Referral of the Situation to the Office of the Prosecutor. This is an open ended investigation. The investigation covers both the actions of the Israelis and the actions of the Palestinians. This is an open-ended processes with no end date. It may close tomorrow or it may never close.

And important point the "survey of experts" did not make clear is that the International Criminal Code stipulates that:


The definition of a crime shall be strictly construed and shall not be extended by analogy. In case of ambiguity, the definition shall be interpreted in favour of the person being investigated, prosecuted or convicted.​

For the life of me, I cannot explain the tumultuous response is all about.
.
1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
Why do you even respond to him? If Israel 🇮🇱 relinquished ALL territories and went back to 67 Borders he would still make that claim, Just sit back and 😊 enjoy the fact he can’t stand that Israel 🇮🇱 even exists
 

Part 1: Resisting Israeli Apartheid | Keynote speaker Omar Barghouti​




Part 2: Resisting Israeli Apartheid | Panelists weigh in​


 

The International Human Rights Community and Israeli Crimes of Apartheid​


 
RE: Israeli Apartheid
SUBTOPIC: Iraq?
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The US condemned Iraqi parliament's passage of legislation that criminalizes normalisation of ties or any relations with Israeli apartheid.
(COMMENT)

The Iraq Parliament owes its very existence to the collation forces that freed them from poor leadership. The fact that they would implement such an edict merely demonstrates how weak-willed they are.

1611604183365.png


Most Respectfully,
R
 
RE: Israeli Apartheid
SUBTOPIC: Iraq?
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
First published in early 2022 ® Amnesty International (AI) Ltd
(COMMENT)

Amnesty International's credibility is circling the drain. AI knows that their rewriting of the Criminal Code does not make it illegal. And AI knows exactly what the code says about rewiting the law:

General Principles of Criminal Law said:
The definition of a crime shall be strictly construed and shall not be extended by analogy. In case of
ambiguity, the definition shall be interpreted in favour of the person being investigated, prosecuted or
convicted.
SOURCE: Article 22 Nullum crimen sine lege • Part 3 • Rome Statutes of the International Criminal Code.

AI makes it abundantly clear that the term “apartheid” was originally used to refer to a political system in South Africa which explicitly enforced racial segregation and the domination and oppression of one racial group by another. It has since been adopted by various hostile Arab elements in the Middle East to criminalize such systems and practices wherever they occur in the world.

There is no racial segregation that separates one race from another. Israel has a much more diverse population than anything seen outside of Israel in the entire Levant. and the domination and oppression of one racial group by another. The Arab Palestinians formally agreed to the establishment of Area "C" in the
agree to ANNEX III Protocol Concerning Civil Affairs • ARTICLE IV Special Provisions concerning Area "C" • which assigned Israel full civil and security control over Area “C".

Now if the Arab Palestinians in the Levant, outside Israeli Sovereign Territory, but under Area "C" control and the jurisdiction, believe that the current ground truth and the actions of the Israeli Article 42 Occupation Authority Hague Regulation 1907 and goes beyond the Israeli Authority, then the Arab Palestinians should have taken the matter under the advisement of Article V, Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements September 13, 1993.
See the TRANSITIONAL PERIOD AND PERMANENT STATUS NEGOTIATIONS. OH wait, Hostile Arab Palestinians

1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 

Forum List

Back
Top