Israel has the most moral army in the world

[Hollie]

I'm requiring you to substantiate the authenticity, accuracy and circumstances of your cut and paste video.

You can't.

No, you're objecting without providing a reason to validate the objection.

You were told precisely the objection. You mindlessly cut and pasted YouTube videos of unknown origin, authenticity and context. You then mindlessly demanded that others need to "disprove" your silly cut and paste videos.

Here's a bit of enlightenment for you: cut and pasted YouTube videos of unknown origin, authenticity and context are pointless.

 

[ABikerSailor]

You know, I gotta go with Hollie on this one, because the videos just show the event, not what happened before (were they attacked?), or show what happened afterwards (did they provide medical assistance to those they injured?).

Additionally, there isn't really any information to tell you exactly where this occurred, nor is there any information pertaining to the mission the soldiers were being given to carry out.

Sometimes you can get videos to prove your point by editing parts out.

 

[Billo_Really]

You know, I gotta go with Hollie on this one, because the videos just show the event, not what happened before (were they attacked?), or show what happened afterwards (did they provide medical assistance to those they injured?).

Additionally, there isn't really any information to tell you exactly where this occurred, nor is there any information pertaining to the mission the soldiers were being given to carry out.

Sometimes you can get videos to prove your point by editing parts out.

There is nothing you can ******* say that would justify what you see in the video.

 

[Billo_Really]

You were told precisely the objection. You mindlessly cut and pasted YouTube videos of unknown origin, authenticity and context. You then mindlessly demanded that others need to "disprove" your silly cut and paste videos.

Here's a bit of enlightenment for you: cut and pasted YouTube videos of unknown origin, authenticity and context are pointless.

I'm not demanding anything. You see a child being beaten in the videos and that's all you need to know. The fact that you're trying to act like those kids were not beaten, shows you are nothing more than an evil ****!

 

[Billo_Really]

**** all you mother-fuckers, who think its okay to beat a child!

 

[Shusha]

Um. No. I created the topic. The topic is to COMPARE and CONTRAST different armies of the world and to weigh them by objective measures of morality.

 

[Shusha]

**** all you mother-fuckers, who think its okay to beat a child!

Billo, my dear, no one is saying it is okay to beat a child. No one is saying that beating a child is a morally correct thing to do.

 

[docmauser1]

How do you know that Finland's army isn't more moral? ;-)

We don't, but once they start dealing at length with ME barbarians with a penchant of reserving human rights and all that crap for themselves exclusively, we will, of course.

 

[docmauser1]

**** all you mother-fuckers, who think its okay to beat a child!

Arabs-muslims do it all the time and rape them too, indeed.

 

[Challenger]

You know, I gotta go with Hollie on this one, because the videos just show the event, not what happened before (were they attacked?), or show what happened afterwards (did they provide medical assistance to those they injured?).

Remember this?

 

[docmauser1]

You know, I gotta go with Hollie on this one, because the videos just show the event, not what happened before (were they attacked?), or show what happened afterwards (did they provide medical assistance to those they injured?).

Remember this?

Remember what?

 

[ABikerSailor]

You know, I gotta go with Hollie on this one, because the videos just show the event, not what happened before (were they attacked?), or show what happened afterwards (did they provide medical assistance to those they injured?).

Additionally, there isn't really any information to tell you exactly where this occurred, nor is there any information pertaining to the mission the soldiers were being given to carry out.

Sometimes you can get videos to prove your point by editing parts out.

There is nothing you can ******* say that would justify what you see in the video.

Like I said, what were the circumstances that led up to the incidents, and were the kids acting as enemy combatants.

And remember, you can't say that kids can't be enemy combatants. If you think so, then Google Joseph Kony and the Lord's Army. He uses kids as young as 10 to be combat soldiers. Some of the methods he uses for "discipline" are downright brutal.

And he uses the kids to carry out the punishments.

So what were the circumstances that led up to the incidents?

 

[ForeverYoung436]

**** all you mother-fuckers, who think its okay to beat a child!

Are you a dad? Because that's quite a blanket statement. I was spanked a couple of times as a kid.

 

[docmauser1]

**** all you mother-fuckers, who think its okay to beat a child!

Are you a dad? ...

Nah, he's a kid.

 

[Billo_Really]

Like I said, what were the circumstances that led up to the incidents, and were the kids acting as enemy combatants.

And remember, you can't say that kids can't be enemy combatants. If you think so, then Google Joseph Kony and the Lord's Army. He uses kids as young as 10 to be combat soldiers. Some of the methods he uses for "discipline" are downright brutal.

And he uses the kids to carry out the punishments.

So what were the circumstances that led up to the incidents?

You can't even treat enemy combatants that way. There is nothing in the Geneva Conventions that allow you to kick and beat a POW in custody.

The fact that you are even attempting to justify the beating of children, says a lot about you.

 

[Billo_Really]

Are you a dad? Because that's quite a blanket statement. I was spanked a couple of times as a kid.

Not to get too far off topic, corporal punishment is child abuse.

 

[docmauser1]

You can't even treat enemy combatants that way. ...

An enemy combatant is of a regular army, not some smelly terrist brat, of course.

 

[Billo_Really]

An enemy combatant is of a regular army, not some smelly terrist brat, of course.

Have it your way...

...you can't even treat terrorist brats that way.

 

[docmauser1]

An enemy combatant is of a regular army, not some smelly terrist brat, of course.

Have it your way... ...you can't even treat terrorist brats that way.

Israel should make their sorry lives as miserable as possible, of course. Can't they rent some reeducation gulag in the Siberia, or in the NK, and send them there?

 

[Challenger]

Purity of Arms:

The IDF serviceman will use force of arms only for the purpose of subduing the enemy to the necessary extent and will limit his use of force so as to prevent unnecessary harm to human life and limb, dignity and property.

The IDF servicemen's purity of arms is their self-control in use of armed force. They will use their arms only for the purpose of achieving their mission, without inflicting unnecessary injury to human life or limb; dignity or property, of both soldiers and civilians, with special consideration for the defenseless, whether in wartime, or during routine security operations, or in the absence of combat, or times of peace. Ruach Tzahal - IDF Code of Ethics | Jewish Virtual Library

See post #130 or type in "IDF beating civillians" to You-Tube, I got 39,200 reesults. Yes, some incidents might be staged or provoked, but the IDF is supposed to be a highly disciplined, well trained, well led force. Actions such as these, reflect poorly on the IDF's self proclaimed "moral stance"