Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Another of your pointless attempts at analogy. The Mexicans do not adhere to a 1,400 year old theocratic code that explicitly vilifies Americans. As you know from your koranology lessons, the Arabs-Moslems have a 1,400 year old hate and war manual and more recently the Hamas Charter that sets out in uncompromising detail the Arab-Moslem revulsion for Jews.Israel exist. Palestinians need to get over the pre Palestine mandate we-were-here-first stuff. If illegal aliens from Mexico can mandate immigration laws in the US, even thought it's historically inaccurate, we can still get along. Why are Palestinians so exclusive and get a free pass destroying immigrant Jews? What paradigm do we accept here in America?
Have the Mexicans declared a Mexican state in the U.S. and have they evicted the non-Mexicans as the Jews evicted the non-Jews in Palestine?
Palestine didn't exist until 1919. A patchwork quilt made out of Lebanon or Syria or Egypt. Muslim Arabs used to live next to Jews for thousands of years. Why not in 1948? Why not NOW?IF the Palestinians would just learn to coexist with the Jews, just accept them, there wouldn't be an issue.I have NO right to post here. I am not either Palestinian or Israeli, So take my post with a grain of salt. I identify with the Israelis, Shalom!. I understand why Jews tend to over react. For all the struggles for them to fit into European society for thousands of years,, ...they were nearly exterminated. IF the Palestinians would just learn to coexist with the Jews, just accept them, there wouldn't be an issue. Israel isn't in the business of extermination, heavy handed with retaliation or self protection, perhaps. I totally understand that.
The fifth national council of the Palestine Liberation Organisation in February 1969 passed a resolution confirming that the PLO's objective was "to establish a free and democratic society in Palestine for all Palestinians whether they are Muslims, Christians or Jews".
One-state solution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It was Israel that shot down that coexistence thing.
A cut and paste Without your comment, from the opinion of a ¨ruth king¨The sister of Wan king?How about if we get a little back on topic Diddums
from
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=6&ved=0ahUKEwi2zNvD_ajMAhVKvoMKHeR8Cq8QFgg_MAU&url=http://www.ruthfullyyours.com/2016/03/30/richard-cravatts-the-lie-of-academic-free-speech-in-the-israelipalestinian-debate-campus-bullies-attempt-to-suppress-opposing-views-by-exploiting-the-concept-of-academic-freedom/&usg=AFQjCNHWS_6djbykQc1nKbmbmk5fbL1YgQ&sig2=ByOlS__vqjPxsr3mwZ5vUQ&bvm=bv.119745492,d.amc
Quote
As the ideological assault against Israel and Jews intensified on university campuses, and pro-Israel individuals began answering back to their ideological opponents, the student groups leading the pro-Palestinian charge (including such groups as the radical Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP)) decided that their tactic of unrelenting demonization of Israel was insufficient, and the best way to optimize the propaganda effect of their anti-Israel message was also to suppress or obscure opposing views.
The pronouncements of these groups are now frequently defined by the baleful whining of these ideological bullies intent on having only their views aired while suppressing the contradictory views of others. In fact, a leaked memorandum from the Binghamton University Students for Justice in Palestine chapter revealed that members would be required to never even engage in dialogue with pro-Israel groups on their campus, they would be prohibited from “engaging in any form of official collaboration, cooperation, or event co-sponsorship with [pro-Israel] student organizations and groups,” and SJP members “shall in no manner engage in any form of official collaboration with any student group which actively opposes the cause of Palestinian liberation nor with groups which have aided and abetted Zionist student organizations,” meaning, of course, that the so-called intellectual debate that universities purport to promote in exactly this type of discussion will never take place when SJP is involved.
And because they cannot win an honest, open ideological debate about the Israeli/Palestinian conflict because they deal almost exclusively in misrepresentations and untruths (the allegation of Israeli apartheid, as the central example), just as the anti-Trump protestors wished to accomplish, SJP has characteristically tried to insure that no pro-Israel voices are heard, either by disrupting or shutting down pro-Israel events and speakers or urging administrators to disinvite speakers they deem to be Islamophobic, too pro-Israel, or critical of their own tactics and activism.
The thuggish substitution of event disruption and the shutting down of other people’s speech for what is supposed to be two-sided academic dialogue and debate occurs with increased regularity, and marks another, more pernicious, aspect of the campus campaign against Israel, Zionism, and Jews.
At University of California, Davis this month, for example, George Deek, a Jaffa-born Arab Christian, planned to give a speech entitled “The Art of Middle East Diplomacy,” when some 30 pro-Palestinian activists stood up and blocked Deek with banners and took over the event by screaming “From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be free,” meaning an Arab state in place of present-day Israel, and chanting such toxic ditties as “long live the Intifada,” “Allahu Akbar,” and “When Palestine is occupied, resistance is justified,” ghoulish calls for the murder of Jews, and “Israel is anti-Black” and “Palestine will be free, fight white supremacy,” an intellectually clumsy way of trying to frame Israel as a racist state.
In February, Bassam Eid, a Palestinian himself and the founder of the Palestinian Human Rights Monitoring Group, witnessed very startlingly how nothing positive said about Israel is allowed to be heard, even from such a credible, though unsual, source as a Palestinian. During his speech, in which he was critical of Hamas and the Palestinian Authority for their failure to seek peace, Eid was verbally attacked by a student attendee, who said in Arabic, “Dr. Bassam, do not dare talk about us [Palestinians] anymore. You have shamed our God … you’ve shamed us, disgraced us, you are a traitor, you are a traitor, in the name of God you are a traitor … You are worse than the Jews and we will hunt you down and find you in every place, be prepared . . . .” When it became obvious that his speech could would not be able to continue uninterrupted, Eid cancelled the event and had to be escorted off site by the police.
End Quote
Arab and Muslims were used to persecuting and oppressing their Jewish minority and forcing them to live in an apartheid system as second class citizens for hundreds of years. The Jews (and other non Muslim minorities such as the Christians) has no other option, were forced to accept.Palestine didn't exist until 1919. A patchwork quilt made out of Lebanon or Syria or Egypt. Muslim Arabs used to live next to Jews for thousands of years. Why not in 1948? Why not NOW?IF the Palestinians would just learn to coexist with the Jews, just accept them, there wouldn't be an issue.I have NO right to post here. I am not either Palestinian or Israeli, So take my post with a grain of salt. I identify with the Israelis, Shalom!. I understand why Jews tend to over react. For all the struggles for them to fit into European society for thousands of years,, ...they were nearly exterminated. IF the Palestinians would just learn to coexist with the Jews, just accept them, there wouldn't be an issue. Israel isn't in the business of extermination, heavy handed with retaliation or self protection, perhaps. I totally understand that.
The fifth national council of the Palestine Liberation Organisation in February 1969 passed a resolution confirming that the PLO's objective was "to establish a free and democratic society in Palestine for all Palestinians whether they are Muslims, Christians or Jews".
One-state solution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It was Israel that shot down that coexistence thing.
Better than your "Press TV" source. Islamic republic of Iran garbage. What a joke.A cut and paste Without your comment, from the opinion of a ¨ruth king¨The sister of Wan king?How about if we get a little back on topic Diddums
from
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=6&ved=0ahUKEwi2zNvD_ajMAhVKvoMKHeR8Cq8QFgg_MAU&url=http://www.ruthfullyyours.com/2016/03/30/richard-cravatts-the-lie-of-academic-free-speech-in-the-israelipalestinian-debate-campus-bullies-attempt-to-suppress-opposing-views-by-exploiting-the-concept-of-academic-freedom/&usg=AFQjCNHWS_6djbykQc1nKbmbmk5fbL1YgQ&sig2=ByOlS__vqjPxsr3mwZ5vUQ&bvm=bv.119745492,d.amc
Quote
As the ideological assault against Israel and Jews intensified on university campuses, and pro-Israel individuals began answering back to their ideological opponents, the student groups leading the pro-Palestinian charge (including such groups as the radical Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP)) decided that their tactic of unrelenting demonization of Israel was insufficient, and the best way to optimize the propaganda effect of their anti-Israel message was also to suppress or obscure opposing views.
The pronouncements of these groups are now frequently defined by the baleful whining of these ideological bullies intent on having only their views aired while suppressing the contradictory views of others. In fact, a leaked memorandum from the Binghamton University Students for Justice in Palestine chapter revealed that members would be required to never even engage in dialogue with pro-Israel groups on their campus, they would be prohibited from “engaging in any form of official collaboration, cooperation, or event co-sponsorship with [pro-Israel] student organizations and groups,” and SJP members “shall in no manner engage in any form of official collaboration with any student group which actively opposes the cause of Palestinian liberation nor with groups which have aided and abetted Zionist student organizations,” meaning, of course, that the so-called intellectual debate that universities purport to promote in exactly this type of discussion will never take place when SJP is involved.
And because they cannot win an honest, open ideological debate about the Israeli/Palestinian conflict because they deal almost exclusively in misrepresentations and untruths (the allegation of Israeli apartheid, as the central example), just as the anti-Trump protestors wished to accomplish, SJP has characteristically tried to insure that no pro-Israel voices are heard, either by disrupting or shutting down pro-Israel events and speakers or urging administrators to disinvite speakers they deem to be Islamophobic, too pro-Israel, or critical of their own tactics and activism.
The thuggish substitution of event disruption and the shutting down of other people’s speech for what is supposed to be two-sided academic dialogue and debate occurs with increased regularity, and marks another, more pernicious, aspect of the campus campaign against Israel, Zionism, and Jews.
At University of California, Davis this month, for example, George Deek, a Jaffa-born Arab Christian, planned to give a speech entitled “The Art of Middle East Diplomacy,” when some 30 pro-Palestinian activists stood up and blocked Deek with banners and took over the event by screaming “From the River to the Sea, Palestine will be free,” meaning an Arab state in place of present-day Israel, and chanting such toxic ditties as “long live the Intifada,” “Allahu Akbar,” and “When Palestine is occupied, resistance is justified,” ghoulish calls for the murder of Jews, and “Israel is anti-Black” and “Palestine will be free, fight white supremacy,” an intellectually clumsy way of trying to frame Israel as a racist state.
In February, Bassam Eid, a Palestinian himself and the founder of the Palestinian Human Rights Monitoring Group, witnessed very startlingly how nothing positive said about Israel is allowed to be heard, even from such a credible, though unsual, source as a Palestinian. During his speech, in which he was critical of Hamas and the Palestinian Authority for their failure to seek peace, Eid was verbally attacked by a student attendee, who said in Arabic, “Dr. Bassam, do not dare talk about us [Palestinians] anymore. You have shamed our God … you’ve shamed us, disgraced us, you are a traitor, you are a traitor, in the name of God you are a traitor … You are worse than the Jews and we will hunt you down and find you in every place, be prepared . . . .” When it became obvious that his speech could would not be able to continue uninterrupted, Eid cancelled the event and had to be escorted off site by the police.
End Quote
Alarmed at the rise of perceived anti-Semitism and anti-Israeli sentiments on the internet, Israeli politicians recently called for nations around the world to enact legislation prohibiting criticism of Jews and Israel. Lobbying to outlaw global free speech is nothing new for Israel, however; it has been in the business of criminalizing speech for decades.
Israel is in the precarious position of receiving tens of billions of dollars in aid every year from nations that purport to support democracy, while simultaneously oppressing the Palestinian people and perpetrating what Nobel Peace Prize winners Bishop Desmond Tutu and President Jimmy Carter deem an apartheid. If the American or European people ever knew that their tax dollars where being used in such a way they would surely cut Israel off. In order to conceal this truth and stifle any criticism, Israel and its lobbyists rely on sympathy from the Holocaust and labels of anti-Semitism to discredit critics. Even US Secretary of State John Kerry was recently called an anti-Semite for supporting a peaceful resolution to the Jewish/Palestinian conflict. Kerry is not alone however, President Obama, and just about anyone who has ever opposed an Israeli policy has been labeled anti-Semitic by his enemies. In order to add teeth to these labels, Israel lobbyists around the world lobby endlessly to criminalize anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial.
Israel’s threat of forcing world governments to enact new laws against free speech should not be taken lightly. Israel and its lobbyists have already succeeded in enacting stiff anti-racist laws in most Western countries. These laws have been used on numerous occasions to jail academics, pro-Palestinian activists, and also individuals who have spoken provable facts that are deemedanti-Semitic “canards.”
In Australia, Jewish groups lobbied successfully to outlaw holocaust study and “hate speech.” As with most laws regulating speech and academic study, it has been routinely abused, and isnow on the list for repeal. In fact, the law is so tied to Jewish lobbying, that the Jewish newspaper Haaretz published an article: Australian Jews brace for a fight against the repeal of hate laws.
In Canada, Jewish groups lobbied for the enactment of hate speech regulation, and defend itsuse today. In 1983, Israel lobbyists filed a complaint against Ernst Zundal over a book he had written. He was tried several times, his citizenship application in Canada denied (even though he had resided there for decades), he was detained for two years without trial, and eventually deported to Germany where he was sentenced to 5 years imprisonment.
In France, Israel lobbyists publicly complained about comedian Dieudonne’s parodies of Israel and the holocaust. His home was raided, his shows banned, and hefty fines were imposed. England also followed suit and barred Dieudonne’s entrance into the country. In 2003, the French legislator and Israel lobbyist Pierre Lellouche managed to push through a law which extends the definition of discrimination to include nationalities so anti-Israel activists could be jailed. In 2009, the Lellouche law was used to convict 20 anti-Israel activists.
In England, Jewish lobbying efforts successfully enacted strict hate speech laws, and inAustria, acclaimed historian David Irving was incarcerated after Israel lobbyists complained about his academic work. The European Jewish Parliament and the chief Israel lobbyist in Belgium recently called for similar laws to stifle criticism of Israel. According to the Canadian Jewish Newsarticle French Vigilance on anti-Israel speech provoking backlash, Israel lobbyists are also attempting to enact similar legislation in the Netherlands.
In America, the Israel lobby has been fighting mightily for years to prohibit hate speech. Those efforts have been unsuccessful thus far, but they have managed to enact hate crime legislation. As Abe Foxman of the ADL noted, the social consequences in America for bigotry against Jews are so severe, (given disproportionate Jewish influence in government, media, finance, higher education, professional sports, etc…) that anti-Israel speakers often see graver consequences than the criminal sanctions they would face in Europe. For example, if one were to be labeled an “anti-Semite,” even if the allegations were wholly unsubstantiated, he would most likely be fired and ostracized from society.
One has to realize that Israel’s efforts having nothing to do with hate speech, anti-Semitism or holocaust denial, but are rather about stifling critical speech that affects Israel and its lobbyists. For example, we know that Israel and its lobbyists are not offended by holocaust denial because Israel and its lobbyists are the leading proponents of Armenian holocaust denial in the world today. Israel should also not be particularly offended by anti-Semitism, because Israel is actually one of the most racist and anti-Semitic nations on the planet.
Today, Israel is furiously enacting anti-free speech laws, hiring internet trolls to spread propaganda and disinformation, and even asking the Jewish owners of social media websites Facebook, Wikipedia, Google, and Youtube to remove material Israel does not like, regardless of its truth or merit. Israel has also campaigned against political parties it does not like in Greece, Hungary, and Ukraine. In Greece, the anti-Israel Golden Dawn Party was disbanded and its leaders arrested for no legal reason. This is a dangerous precedent that threatens world wide freedom and must be combated immediately, before speaking out against such Israeli efforts is also illegal.
Israel Campaigns Against Global Free Speech
A drowning man will clutch at straws
A cut and paster will dump the contents of someone's blog into a thread.
Here again the Palestinians, and the British, wanted a single state. The Palestinians wanted a secular state. The British not so much. The Zionists not at all.Palestine didn't exist until 1919. A patchwork quilt made out of Lebanon or Syria or Egypt. Muslim Arabs used to live next to Jews for thousands of years. Why not in 1948? Why not NOW?IF the Palestinians would just learn to coexist with the Jews, just accept them, there wouldn't be an issue.I have NO right to post here. I am not either Palestinian or Israeli, So take my post with a grain of salt. I identify with the Israelis, Shalom!. I understand why Jews tend to over react. For all the struggles for them to fit into European society for thousands of years,, ...they were nearly exterminated. IF the Palestinians would just learn to coexist with the Jews, just accept them, there wouldn't be an issue. Israel isn't in the business of extermination, heavy handed with retaliation or self protection, perhaps. I totally understand that.
The fifth national council of the Palestine Liberation Organisation in February 1969 passed a resolution confirming that the PLO's objective was "to establish a free and democratic society in Palestine for all Palestinians whether they are Muslims, Christians or Jews".
One-state solution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It was Israel that shot down that coexistence thing.
Here again the Palestinians, and the British, wanted a single state. The Palestinians wanted a secular state. The British not so much. The Zionists not at all.Palestine didn't exist until 1919. A patchwork quilt made out of Lebanon or Syria or Egypt. Muslim Arabs used to live next to Jews for thousands of years. Why not in 1948? Why not NOW?IF the Palestinians would just learn to coexist with the Jews, just accept them, there wouldn't be an issue.I have NO right to post here. I am not either Palestinian or Israeli, So take my post with a grain of salt. I identify with the Israelis, Shalom!. I understand why Jews tend to over react. For all the struggles for them to fit into European society for thousands of years,, ...they were nearly exterminated. IF the Palestinians would just learn to coexist with the Jews, just accept them, there wouldn't be an issue. Israel isn't in the business of extermination, heavy handed with retaliation or self protection, perhaps. I totally understand that.
The fifth national council of the Palestine Liberation Organisation in February 1969 passed a resolution confirming that the PLO's objective was "to establish a free and democratic society in Palestine for all Palestinians whether they are Muslims, Christians or Jews".
One-state solution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It was Israel that shot down that coexistence thing.
Here is a fairly brief video explaining the beginning of the problem.
Leila Farsakh: Mandatory Palestine prior to 1939 - Opposition to British policy and Zionist project
Israel's acts of desperation.
PALESTINIAN STUDENTS EXCEPTION TO FREE SPEECH
Here again the Palestinians, and the British, wanted a single state. The Palestinians wanted a secular state. The British not so much. The Zionists not at all.Palestine didn't exist until 1919. A patchwork quilt made out of Lebanon or Syria or Egypt. Muslim Arabs used to live next to Jews for thousands of years. Why not in 1948? Why not NOW?IF the Palestinians would just learn to coexist with the Jews, just accept them, there wouldn't be an issue.I have NO right to post here. I am not either Palestinian or Israeli, So take my post with a grain of salt. I identify with the Israelis, Shalom!. I understand why Jews tend to over react. For all the struggles for them to fit into European society for thousands of years,, ...they were nearly exterminated. IF the Palestinians would just learn to coexist with the Jews, just accept them, there wouldn't be an issue. Israel isn't in the business of extermination, heavy handed with retaliation or self protection, perhaps. I totally understand that.
The fifth national council of the Palestine Liberation Organisation in February 1969 passed a resolution confirming that the PLO's objective was "to establish a free and democratic society in Palestine for all Palestinians whether they are Muslims, Christians or Jews".
One-state solution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It was Israel that shot down that coexistence thing.
Here is a fairly brief video explaining the beginning of the problem.
Leila Farsakh: Mandatory Palestine prior to 1939 - Opposition to British policy and Zionist project
Here again the Palestinians, and the British, wanted a single state. The Palestinians wanted a secular state. The British not so much. The Zionists not at all.Palestine didn't exist until 1919. A patchwork quilt made out of Lebanon or Syria or Egypt. Muslim Arabs used to live next to Jews for thousands of years. Why not in 1948? Why not NOW?IF the Palestinians would just learn to coexist with the Jews, just accept them, there wouldn't be an issue.I have NO right to post here. I am not either Palestinian or Israeli, So take my post with a grain of salt. I identify with the Israelis, Shalom!. I understand why Jews tend to over react. For all the struggles for them to fit into European society for thousands of years,, ...they were nearly exterminated. IF the Palestinians would just learn to coexist with the Jews, just accept them, there wouldn't be an issue. Israel isn't in the business of extermination, heavy handed with retaliation or self protection, perhaps. I totally understand that.
The fifth national council of the Palestine Liberation Organisation in February 1969 passed a resolution confirming that the PLO's objective was "to establish a free and democratic society in Palestine for all Palestinians whether they are Muslims, Christians or Jews".
One-state solution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It was Israel that shot down that coexistence thing.
Here is a fairly brief video explaining the beginning of the problem.
Leila Farsakh: Mandatory Palestine prior to 1939 - Opposition to British policy and Zionist project
Here again the Palestinians, and the British, wanted a single state. The Palestinians wanted a secular state. The British not so much. The Zionists not at all.Palestine didn't exist until 1919. A patchwork quilt made out of Lebanon or Syria or Egypt. Muslim Arabs used to live next to Jews for thousands of years. Why not in 1948? Why not NOW?IF the Palestinians would just learn to coexist with the Jews, just accept them, there wouldn't be an issue.I have NO right to post here. I am not either Palestinian or Israeli, So take my post with a grain of salt. I identify with the Israelis, Shalom!. I understand why Jews tend to over react. For all the struggles for them to fit into European society for thousands of years,, ...they were nearly exterminated. IF the Palestinians would just learn to coexist with the Jews, just accept them, there wouldn't be an issue. Israel isn't in the business of extermination, heavy handed with retaliation or self protection, perhaps. I totally understand that.
The fifth national council of the Palestine Liberation Organisation in February 1969 passed a resolution confirming that the PLO's objective was "to establish a free and democratic society in Palestine for all Palestinians whether they are Muslims, Christians or Jews".
One-state solution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It was Israel that shot down that coexistence thing.
Here is a fairly brief video explaining the beginning of the problem.
Leila Farsakh: Mandatory Palestine prior to 1939 - Opposition to British policy and Zionist project
Secular?! She forgot to mention the Nazi Mufti of Palestine who wanted to establish an IslamioNazi Caliphate of Palestine and went around slaughtering Christians and Jews around the same time.
Hitler's Mufti | Catholic Answers
Recent work by historians and apologists has revealed that an influential, international religious leader was also an ardent supporter of Adolf Hitler. His name was not Pope Pius XII but Hajj Amin al-Husseini. This Grand Mufti of Jerusalem recruited whole divisions of fanatics to fight and kill in the name of extremism.
Revered in some circles today as one of the fathers of modern radical Islam, al-Husseini has been the subject of a number of modern studies. Scholars such as David Dalin, John Rothmann, Chuck Morse, and others have courageously brought al-Husseini’s actions to light. "Hitler’s Mufti," as many have called him, had a direct hand in some of the darkest moments of the Holocaust, the slaughter of tens of thousands of Christians, and the formation of some of the most hate-filled generations of modern history. Al-Husseini is a testament to the way that evil finds evil.
Here, people, we see a foreign (probably British Muslim) reprobate, making excuses for the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem siding with Adolf Hitler and his slaughtering of the Jews....Hitler was baptized and confirmed as a Roman Catholic, his people, the Germans, were Christians. Why would Hitler want German Christians slaughtered? In any case, the Mufti did what any patriot would do, ally himself with the enemy of the nation (Britain) that was planning to evict his people from their homes/land and replace them with European Jews. Many people in the British colonies supported the Germans as enemies of their foreign colonial ruler.
Here again the Palestinians, and the British, wanted a single state. The Palestinians wanted a secular state. The British not so much. The Zionists not at all.Palestine didn't exist until 1919. A patchwork quilt made out of Lebanon or Syria or Egypt. Muslim Arabs used to live next to Jews for thousands of years. Why not in 1948? Why not NOW?IF the Palestinians would just learn to coexist with the Jews, just accept them, there wouldn't be an issue.I have NO right to post here. I am not either Palestinian or Israeli, So take my post with a grain of salt. I identify with the Israelis, Shalom!. I understand why Jews tend to over react. For all the struggles for them to fit into European society for thousands of years,, ...they were nearly exterminated. IF the Palestinians would just learn to coexist with the Jews, just accept them, there wouldn't be an issue. Israel isn't in the business of extermination, heavy handed with retaliation or self protection, perhaps. I totally understand that.
The fifth national council of the Palestine Liberation Organisation in February 1969 passed a resolution confirming that the PLO's objective was "to establish a free and democratic society in Palestine for all Palestinians whether they are Muslims, Christians or Jews".
One-state solution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It was Israel that shot down that coexistence thing.
Here is a fairly brief video explaining the beginning of the problem.
Leila Farsakh: Mandatory Palestine prior to 1939 - Opposition to British policy and Zionist project
Secular?! She forgot to mention the Nazi Mufti of Palestine who wanted to establish an IslamioNazi Caliphate of Palestine and went around slaughtering Christians and Jews around the same time.
Hitler's Mufti | Catholic Answers
Recent work by historians and apologists has revealed that an influential, international religious leader was also an ardent supporter of Adolf Hitler. His name was not Pope Pius XII but Hajj Amin al-Husseini. This Grand Mufti of Jerusalem recruited whole divisions of fanatics to fight and kill in the name of extremism.
Revered in some circles today as one of the fathers of modern radical Islam, al-Husseini has been the subject of a number of modern studies. Scholars such as David Dalin, John Rothmann, Chuck Morse, and others have courageously brought al-Husseini’s actions to light. "Hitler’s Mufti," as many have called him, had a direct hand in some of the darkest moments of the Holocaust, the slaughter of tens of thousands of Christians, and the formation of some of the most hate-filled generations of modern history. Al-Husseini is a testament to the way that evil finds evil.
Hitler was baptized and confirmed as a Roman Catholic, his people, the Germans, were Christians. Why would Hitler want German Christians slaughtered?
In any case, the Mufti did what any patriot would do, ally himself with the enemy of the nation (Britain) that was planning to evict his people from their homes/land and replace them with European Jews. Many people in the British colonies supported the Germans as enemies of their foreign colonial ruler.
Here, people, we see a foreign (probably British Muslim) reprobate, making excuses for the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem siding with Adolf Hitler and his slaughtering of the Jews....Hitler was baptized and confirmed as a Roman Catholic, his people, the Germans, were Christians. Why would Hitler want German Christians slaughtered? In any case, the Mufti did what any patriot would do, ally himself with the enemy of the nation (Britain) that was planning to evict his people from their homes/land and replace them with European Jews. Many people in the British colonies supported the Germans as enemies of their foreign colonial ruler.
Just goes to prove that shit really DOES float to the top sometimes.
Here again the Palestinians, and the British, wanted a single state. The Palestinians wanted a secular state. The British not so much. The Zionists not at all.Palestine didn't exist until 1919. A patchwork quilt made out of Lebanon or Syria or Egypt. Muslim Arabs used to live next to Jews for thousands of years. Why not in 1948? Why not NOW?IF the Palestinians would just learn to coexist with the Jews, just accept them, there wouldn't be an issue.
The fifth national council of the Palestine Liberation Organisation in February 1969 passed a resolution confirming that the PLO's objective was "to establish a free and democratic society in Palestine for all Palestinians whether they are Muslims, Christians or Jews".
One-state solution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It was Israel that shot down that coexistence thing.
Here is a fairly brief video explaining the beginning of the problem.
Leila Farsakh: Mandatory Palestine prior to 1939 - Opposition to British policy and Zionist project
Secular?! She forgot to mention the Nazi Mufti of Palestine who wanted to establish an IslamioNazi Caliphate of Palestine and went around slaughtering Christians and Jews around the same time.
Hitler's Mufti | Catholic Answers
Recent work by historians and apologists has revealed that an influential, international religious leader was also an ardent supporter of Adolf Hitler. His name was not Pope Pius XII but Hajj Amin al-Husseini. This Grand Mufti of Jerusalem recruited whole divisions of fanatics to fight and kill in the name of extremism.
Revered in some circles today as one of the fathers of modern radical Islam, al-Husseini has been the subject of a number of modern studies. Scholars such as David Dalin, John Rothmann, Chuck Morse, and others have courageously brought al-Husseini’s actions to light. "Hitler’s Mufti," as many have called him, had a direct hand in some of the darkest moments of the Holocaust, the slaughter of tens of thousands of Christians, and the formation of some of the most hate-filled generations of modern history. Al-Husseini is a testament to the way that evil finds evil.
Hitler was baptized and confirmed as a Roman Catholic, his people, the Germans, were Christians. Why would Hitler want German Christians slaughtered?
In any case, the Mufti did what any patriot would do, ally himself with the enemy of the nation (Britain) that was planning to evict his people from their homes/land and replace them with European Jews. Many people in the British colonies supported the Germans as enemies of their foreign colonial ruler.
Your heros Adolph and the Mufti are rarely thought of as patriots. They simply shared an ideology of hate that appealed to both xtians and Islamists.
