isnt any different between all of moslem?

[deltex1]

Well this guy I work with is from Bosnia and is Muslim. I've been to his house. His wife doesn't have to hide her face or anything sinister lol. His kids are hooked on video games one plays soccer. They have no accent like he does they are already very Americanized lol.

It is obvious he isn't a radical Muslim at all. The guy works his ass off too. I mean this guy is amazing he could build a house for you in a month. It's obvious he was poor and escaped a nasty war. He is probably pretty lucky. I don't ask about it.

His mother is still alive and still over there. I doubt she is a threat. I'd hate for her to be blocked but agree she should be looked at closely for national security(that's security for ALL Americans Muslims included) reasons. And I asked him and he agrees.

Not all Muslims are out to get ya. Radicalized Muslims are a problem though without a doubt. Don't think they all are though, my coworker certainly isn't. This guy is paying a mortgage as well, no handouts. He is working towards the "American dream" for his kids.

Tell Obama...see if he will invite him to the Rose Garden.

 

[Redfish]

Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com
Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com
my poll : all or none or ......?
make sense now?

Let me see if I can translate -- do you mean:

Choice 1: Ban "radical Muslims"
Choice 2: Ban "regular Muslims"
Choice 3: Ban ALL Mulims
Choice 4: Ban NO Muslims​

?

The problem is that we cant tell the good ones from he bad ones when they enter the USA.

Grape analogy: If you have a bowl of 1000 grapes and you know that 20 contain poison that will kill you, would you just grab a handful and eat them?

True. And that's because religion isn't the benchmark --- politics is.

And that's one of the costs of deliberately using fallacies conflating the two -- we get this absolute bullshit demagoguery that Rump* is pushing.

We have an elaborate vetting system already in place anyway.


(Note to OP -- I call Trump "Rump". It's a reference to the buttocks, which is how I view him)

did our vetting system find the San Bernardino female shooter? Duh, no. If we cannot identify one Saudi woman who is a murdering radical, how can we vet thousands of "refugees" ?

Trump said that we should stop all muslim immigration until we have a valid system for vetting them that actually works. Most intelligent human beings agree with that.

 

[Tilly]

Well this guy I work with is from Bosnia and is Muslim. I've been to his house. His wife doesn't have to hide her face or anything sinister lol. His kids are hooked on video games one plays soccer. They have no accent like he does they are already very Americanized lol.

It is obvious he isn't a radical Muslim at all. The guy works his ass off too. I mean this guy is amazing he could build a house for you in a month. It's obvious he was poor and escaped a nasty war. He is probably pretty lucky. I don't ask about it.

His mother is still alive and still over there. I doubt she is a threat. I'd hate for her to be blocked but agree she should be looked at closely for national security(that's security for ALL Americans Muslims included) reasons. And I asked him and he agrees.

Not all Muslims are out to get ya. Radicalized Muslims are a problem though without a doubt. Don't think they all are though, my coworker certainly isn't. This guy is paying a mortgage as well, no handouts. He is working towards the "American dream" for his kids.

Many 'radicalised' Muslims in the West start out just like the guy you are talking about. How many times do we need to hear 'Ahmed was such a lovely guy, he played football and PlayStation games. We had NO IDEA'. We hear this from the family and closest friends almost every time a 'normal' muslim goes rogue. Of course, we also often hear that they became 'more devout', grew a beard, started attending mosque more often and so on, but this increase in observance never seems to be a red flag, for obvious reasons.

 

[Tilly]

Well this guy I work with is from Bosnia and is Muslim. I've been to his house. His wife doesn't have to hide her face or anything sinister lol. His kids are hooked on video games one plays soccer. They have no accent like he does they are already very Americanized lol.

It is obvious he isn't a radical Muslim at all. The guy works his ass off too. I mean this guy is amazing he could build a house for you in a month. It's obvious he was poor and escaped a nasty war. He is probably pretty lucky. I don't ask about it.

His mother is still alive and still over there. I doubt she is a threat. I'd hate for her to be blocked but agree she should be looked at closely for national security(that's security for ALL Americans Muslims included) reasons. And I asked him and he agrees.

Not all Muslims are out to get ya. Radicalized Muslims are a problem though without a doubt. Don't think they all are though, my coworker certainly isn't. This guy is paying a mortgage as well, no handouts. He is working towards the "American dream" for his kids. His wife busts her ass cleaning houses and apartments.

Many Muslim terrorists and wannabe terrorists in Europe have been professionals - doctors and teachers, for example, with mortgages, children and good lives.

 

[Coyote]

Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com
Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com
my poll : all or none or ......?
make sense now?

Let me see if I can translate -- do you mean:

Choice 1: Ban "radical Muslims"
Choice 2: Ban "regular Muslims"
Choice 3: Ban ALL Mulims
Choice 4: Ban NO Muslims​

?

please dont troll my bad english



choice 2,3, 4 is ok

choice 1: ban very religious moslem.
if moslem use burke.she is consertative and very religious .but maybe she isnt radical
but all radical moslem are very consertative and very religious

Welcome to USMB Dani

I edited your poll to the choices here since the poll is confusing. Let me know if your intent is correctly expressed - I can make any other changes you want.

 

[Pogo]

Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com
Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com
my poll : all or none or ......?
make sense now?

Let me see if I can translate -- do you mean:

Choice 1: Ban "radical Muslims"
Choice 2: Ban "regular Muslims"
Choice 3: Ban ALL Mulims
Choice 4: Ban NO Muslims​

?

The problem is that we cant tell the good ones from he bad ones when they enter the USA.

Grape analogy: If you have a bowl of 1000 grapes and you know that 20 contain poison that will kill you, would you just grab a handful and eat them?

True. And that's because religion isn't the benchmark --- politics is.

And that's one of the costs of deliberately using fallacies conflating the two -- we get this absolute bullshit demagoguery that Rump* is pushing.

We have an elaborate vetting system already in place anyway.


(Note to OP -- I call Trump "Rump". It's a reference to the buttocks, which is how I view him)

did our vetting system find the San Bernardino female shooter? Duh, no. If we cannot identify one Saudi woman who is a murdering radical, how can we vet thousands of "refugees" ?

Trump said that we should stop all muslim immigration until we have a valid system for vetting them that actually works. Most intelligent human beings agree with that.

And that complete fearmongering lowest-common-denominator appeal demagoguery bullshit.
It assumes that religion is the basis. It isn't.

It's a touchy-feely device to get attention, in complete abject ignorance of the big picture. It takes our eye off the ball. It's Rump being what Rump has been for his entire life --- a PR machine for his own self-aggrandizement.

I mean, get real.

 

[Redfish]

Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com
Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com
my poll : all or none or ......?
make sense now?

Let me see if I can translate -- do you mean:

Choice 1: Ban "radical Muslims"
Choice 2: Ban "regular Muslims"
Choice 3: Ban ALL Mulims
Choice 4: Ban NO Muslims​

?

The problem is that we cant tell the good ones from he bad ones when they enter the USA.

Grape analogy: If you have a bowl of 1000 grapes and you know that 20 contain poison that will kill you, would you just grab a handful and eat them?

True. And that's because religion isn't the benchmark --- politics is.

And that's one of the costs of deliberately using fallacies conflating the two -- we get this absolute bullshit demagoguery that Rump* is pushing.

We have an elaborate vetting system already in place anyway.


(Note to OP -- I call Trump "Rump". It's a reference to the buttocks, which is how I view him)

did our vetting system find the San Bernardino female shooter? Duh, no. If we cannot identify one Saudi woman who is a murdering radical, how can we vet thousands of "refugees" ?

Trump said that we should stop all muslim immigration until we have a valid system for vetting them that actually works. Most intelligent human beings agree with that.

And that complete fearmongering lowest-common-denominator appeal demagoguery bullshit.
It assumes that religion is the basis. It isn't.

It's a touchy-feely device to get attention, in complete abject ignorance of the big picture. It takes our eye off the ball. It's Rump being what Rump has been for his entire life --- a PR machine for his own self-aggrandizement.

I mean, get real.

what vetting system would you use? Or would you just eat all of the grapes?

I agree that its not just about religion. Would you limit it to arab looking people?

I don't understand what you liberals want to do here. Just let everyone in?

 

[Tilly]

They never had a reformation...

salafi, wahabbi.

 

[deltex1]

Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com
Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com
my poll : all or none or ......?
make sense now?

Let me see if I can translate -- do you mean:

Choice 1: Ban "radical Muslims"
Choice 2: Ban "regular Muslims"
Choice 3: Ban ALL Mulims
Choice 4: Ban NO Muslims​

?

The problem is that we cant tell the good ones from he bad ones when they enter the USA.

Grape analogy: If you have a bowl of 1000 grapes and you know that 20 contain poison that will kill you, would you just grab a handful and eat them?

True. And that's because religion isn't the benchmark --- politics is.

And that's one of the costs of deliberately using fallacies conflating the two -- we get this absolute bullshit demagoguery that Rump* is pushing.

We have an elaborate vetting system already in place anyway.


(Note to OP -- I call Trump "Rump". It's a reference to the buttocks, which is how I view him)

did our vetting system find the San Bernardino female shooter? Duh, no. If we cannot identify one Saudi woman who is a murdering radical, how can we vet thousands of "refugees" ?

Trump said that we should stop all muslim immigration until we have a valid system for vetting them that actually works. Most intelligent human beings agree with that.

And that complete fearmongering lowest-common-denominator appeal demagoguery bullshit.
It assumes that religion is the basis. It isn't.

It's a touchy-feely device to get attention, in complete abject ignorance of the big picture. It takes our eye off the ball. It's Rump being what Rump has been for his entire life --- a PR machine for his own self-aggrandizement.

I mean, get real.

You were the assholes that brought religion into the trump proposal in the first place. GFY.

 

[Redfish]

Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com
Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com
my poll : all or none or ......?
make sense now?

Let me see if I can translate -- do you mean:

Choice 1: Ban "radical Muslims"
Choice 2: Ban "regular Muslims"
Choice 3: Ban ALL Mulims
Choice 4: Ban NO Muslims​

?

The problem is that we cant tell the good ones from he bad ones when they enter the USA.

Grape analogy: If you have a bowl of 1000 grapes and you know that 20 contain poison that will kill you, would you just grab a handful and eat them?

True. And that's because religion isn't the benchmark --- politics is.

And that's one of the costs of deliberately using fallacies conflating the two -- we get this absolute bullshit demagoguery that Rump* is pushing.

We have an elaborate vetting system already in place anyway.


(Note to OP -- I call Trump "Rump". It's a reference to the buttocks, which is how I view him)

did our vetting system find the San Bernardino female shooter? Duh, no. If we cannot identify one Saudi woman who is a murdering radical, how can we vet thousands of "refugees" ?

Trump said that we should stop all muslim immigration until we have a valid system for vetting them that actually works. Most intelligent human beings agree with that.

And that complete fearmongering lowest-common-denominator appeal demagoguery bullshit.
It assumes that religion is the basis. It isn't.

It's a touchy-feely device to get attention, in complete abject ignorance of the big picture. It takes our eye off the ball. It's Rump being what Rump has been for his entire life --- a PR machine for his own self-aggrandizement.

I mean, get real.

I get it that you don't like Trump. Great, who cares what you like or don't like? The truth is that Trump is saying what a majority of americans are thinking, and has a very good chance of becoming president, especially if the dems stick with the hildebeast.

 

[Tehon]

Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com
Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com
my poll : all or none or ......?
make sense now?

Let me see if I can translate -- do you mean:

Choice 1: Ban "radical Muslims"
Choice 2: Ban "regular Muslims"
Choice 3: Ban ALL Mulims
Choice 4: Ban NO Muslims​

?

The problem is that we cant tell the good ones from he bad ones when they enter the USA.

Grape analogy: If you have a bowl of 1000 grapes and you know that 20 contain poison that will kill you, would you just grab a handful and eat them?

True. And that's because religion isn't the benchmark --- politics is.

And that's one of the costs of deliberately using fallacies conflating the two -- we get this absolute bullshit demagoguery that Rump* is pushing.

We have an elaborate vetting system already in place anyway.


(Note to OP -- I call Trump "Rump". It's a reference to the buttocks, which is how I view him)

did our vetting system find the San Bernardino female shooter? Duh, no. If we cannot identify one Saudi woman who is a murdering radical, how can we vet thousands of "refugees" ?

Trump said that we should stop all muslim immigration until we have a valid system for vetting them that actually works. Most intelligent human beings agree with that.

A comparable argument to that of gun control advocates.

 

[dani67]

malasyan are sunni too.

but problem is salafi/vahabi sunni.

Are these whores or virgins?

they are just kurdish girl . and they are dancing in wedding party

malasyan are sunni too.

but problem is salafi/vahabi sunni.

Are these whores or virgins?

they are just kurdish girl . and they are dancing in wedding party

So what's your plan since the jihadis are worthless excrement and the poor kurd girls would be taken as sex slaves and beaten by these animals. Shia would do the same to these girls. Shia just as worthless as the jihadis. One would think that after 1400 years of murder, rape, pillage that the ME would accidentally back into the enlightenment era.

sorry for bad english
..
1:what is your source?
propaganda from israel lobbyist media and suidi arabia money ?
slavery is forbideen in shia
2:
KURDISH ARE SUNNI AND SHIA TOO
kurdish are iranian too.iran have 10 million+ kurd.
AND THEY LIVING IN MUST STATES OF IRAN.half of them are shia and half of them are sunni
my uncle married with kurd

 

[LordBrownTrout]

malasyan are sunni too.

but problem is salafi/vahabi sunni.

Are these whores or virgins?

they are just kurdish girl . and they are dancing in wedding party

malasyan are sunni too.

but problem is salafi/vahabi sunni.

Are these whores or virgins?

they are just kurdish girl . and they are dancing in wedding party

So what's your plan since the jihadis are worthless excrement and the poor kurd girls would be taken as sex slaves and beaten by these animals. Shia would do the same to these girls. Shia just as worthless as the jihadis. One would think that after 1400 years of murder, rape, pillage that the ME would accidentally back into the enlightenment era.

ONE WOULD THINK. 1400 years later the USA would get the hell out of the mid east and mind our own damn business and leave these people the hell alone.

It wouldnt matter if we were over there or not. These animals were and have been hacking, killing, raping, murdering, pillaging for centuries...even millenia before the barbary wars.

 

[Redfish]

Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com
Donald Trump: Ban all Muslim travel to U.S. - CNNPolitics.com
my poll : all or none or ......?
make sense now?

Let me see if I can translate -- do you mean:

Choice 1: Ban "radical Muslims"
Choice 2: Ban "regular Muslims"
Choice 3: Ban ALL Mulims
Choice 4: Ban NO Muslims​

?

The problem is that we cant tell the good ones from he bad ones when they enter the USA.

Grape analogy: If you have a bowl of 1000 grapes and you know that 20 contain poison that will kill you, would you just grab a handful and eat them?

True. And that's because religion isn't the benchmark --- politics is.

And that's one of the costs of deliberately using fallacies conflating the two -- we get this absolute bullshit demagoguery that Rump* is pushing.

We have an elaborate vetting system already in place anyway.


(Note to OP -- I call Trump "Rump". It's a reference to the buttocks, which is how I view him)

did our vetting system find the San Bernardino female shooter? Duh, no. If we cannot identify one Saudi woman who is a murdering radical, how can we vet thousands of "refugees" ?

Trump said that we should stop all muslim immigration until we have a valid system for vetting them that actually works. Most intelligent human beings agree with that.

A comparable argument to that of gun control advocates.

only if you ignore the 2nd amendment to the constitution.

 

[deltex1]

malasyan are sunni too.

but problem is salafi/vahabi sunni.

Are these whores or virgins?

they are just kurdish girl . and they are dancing in wedding party

malasyan are sunni too.

but problem is salafi/vahabi sunni.

Are these whores or virgins?

they are just kurdish girl . and they are dancing in wedding party

So what's your plan since the jihadis are worthless excrement and the poor kurd girls would be taken as sex slaves and beaten by these animals. Shia would do the same to these girls. Shia just as worthless as the jihadis. One would think that after 1400 years of murder, rape, pillage that the ME would accidentally back into the enlightenment era.

sorry for bad english
..
1:what is your source?
propaganda from israel lobbyist media and suidi arabia money ?
slavery is forbideen in shia
2:
KURDISH ARE SUNNI AND SHIA TOO
kurdish are iranian too.iran have 10 million+ kurd.
AND THEY LIVING IN MUST STATES OF IRAN.half of them are shia and half of them are sunni
my uncle married with kurd

When are you guys going to test your nuke?

 

[Pogo]

Well this guy I work with is from Bosnia and is Muslim. I've been to his house. His wife doesn't have to hide her face or anything sinister lol. His kids are hooked on video games one plays soccer. They have no accent like he does they are already very Americanized lol.

It is obvious he isn't a radical Muslim at all. The guy works his ass off too. I mean this guy is amazing he could build a house for you in a month. It's obvious he was poor and escaped a nasty war. He is probably pretty lucky. I don't ask about it.

His mother is still alive and still over there. I doubt she is a threat. I'd hate for her to be blocked but agree she should be looked at closely for national security(that's security for ALL Americans Muslims included) reasons. And I asked him and he agrees.

Not all Muslims are out to get ya. Radicalized Muslims are a problem though without a doubt. Don't think they all are though, my coworker certainly isn't. This guy is paying a mortgage as well, no handouts. He is working towards the "American dream" for his kids. His wife busts her ass cleaning houses and apartments.

Good example. I grew up with a neighbor like that. Lebanese IIRC.

The point that is continually missed here -- and it seems deliberately missed/ignored --- is that ALL radical terrorists are a concern to be vetted, regardless what their religion happens to be or not be.

105 years ago tomorrow (for example) there was a huge terrorist shooting rampage/gun battle/burning building in London. Winston Churchill got a bullet in his hat. No "Muslims" involved as far as anybody knows -- but that doesn't make it somehow less dangerous. On the same date in 1920 the Palmer Raids rounded up six thousand people as potential "terrorists" here in the US. Lots of Russians and Italians -- not so much "Muslims".

Terrorism is terrorism. Asking them to stop and check a box so we can figure out which ones are this religion or that religion is a fool's errand, and childish.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

malasyan are sunni too.

but problem is salafi/vahabi sunni.

Are these whores or virgins?

they are just kurdish girl . and they are dancing in wedding party

malasyan are sunni too.

but problem is salafi/vahabi sunni.

Are these whores or virgins?

they are just kurdish girl . and they are dancing in wedding party

So what's your plan since the jihadis are worthless excrement and the poor kurd girls would be taken as sex slaves and beaten by these animals. Shia would do the same to these girls. Shia just as worthless as the jihadis. One would think that after 1400 years of murder, rape, pillage that the ME would accidentally back into the enlightenment era.

sorry for bad english
..
1:what is your source?
propaganda from israel lobbyist media and suidi arabia money ?
slavery is forbideen in shia
2:
KURDISH ARE SUNNI AND SHIA TOO
kurdish are iranian too.iran have 10 million+ kurd.
AND THEY LIVING IN MUST STATES OF IRAN.half of them are shia and half of them are sunni
my uncle married with kurd

Yes, there are factions within different tribes and yes, they continue to kill each other. How do you explain the inbreeding in the sunni and shia culture especially in the rural areas? One other note, you brought up israel and saudi...not I. Im not asking about those countries.

 

[Redfish]

Well this guy I work with is from Bosnia and is Muslim. I've been to his house. His wife doesn't have to hide her face or anything sinister lol. His kids are hooked on video games one plays soccer. They have no accent like he does they are already very Americanized lol.

It is obvious he isn't a radical Muslim at all. The guy works his ass off too. I mean this guy is amazing he could build a house for you in a month. It's obvious he was poor and escaped a nasty war. He is probably pretty lucky. I don't ask about it.

His mother is still alive and still over there. I doubt she is a threat. I'd hate for her to be blocked but agree she should be looked at closely for national security(that's security for ALL Americans Muslims included) reasons. And I asked him and he agrees.

Not all Muslims are out to get ya. Radicalized Muslims are a problem though without a doubt. Don't think they all are though, my coworker certainly isn't. This guy is paying a mortgage as well, no handouts. He is working towards the "American dream" for his kids. His wife busts her ass cleaning houses and apartments.

Good example. I grew up with a neighbor like that. Lebanese IIRC.

The point that is continually missed here -- and it seems deliberately missed/ignored --- is that ALL radical terrorists are a concern to be vetted, regardless what their religion happens to be or not be.

105 years ago tomorrow (for example) there was a huge terrorist shooting rampage/gun battle/burning building in London. Winston Churchill got a bullet in his hat. No "Muslims" involved as far as anybody knows -- but that doesn't make it somehow less dangerous. On the same date in 1920 the Palmer Raids rounded up six thousand people as potential "terrorists" here in the US. Lots of Russians and Italians -- not so much "Muslims".

Terrorism is terrorism. Asking them to stop and check a box so we can figure out which ones are this religion or that religion is a fool's errand, and childish.

what specifically do you want done regarding muslim/arab/refugee immigration? Give us specifics or STFU

 

[dani67]

malasyan are sunni too.

but problem is salafi/vahabi sunni.

Are these whores or virgins?

they are just kurdish girl . and they are dancing in wedding party

malasyan are sunni too.

but problem is salafi/vahabi sunni.

Are these whores or virgins?

they are just kurdish girl . and they are dancing in wedding party

So what's your plan since the jihadis are worthless excrement and the poor kurd girls would be taken as sex slaves and beaten by these animals. Shia would do the same to these girls. Shia just as worthless as the jihadis. One would think that after 1400 years of murder, rape, pillage that the ME would accidentally back into the enlightenment era.

ONE WOULD THINK. 1400 years later the USA would get the hell out of the mid east and mind our own damn business and leave these people the hell alone.

It wouldnt matter if we were over there or not. These animals were and have been hacking, killing, raping, murdering, pillaging for centuries...even millenia before the barbary wars.

but this basterd animals are your allies
99 % of this basterds are salafi/wahabi.salafi wahabi did build by suidi arabia empire
for example paris attack planned in belgium mosque.
who build this mosque? suidi arabia
Iraq crisis: How Saudi Arabia helped Isis take over the north of the country
Iraq: How Saudi Arabia helped Isis take over the north of the country

Saudi Funding of ISIS
Saudi Funding of ISIS

 

[Pogo]

Well this guy I work with is from Bosnia and is Muslim. I've been to his house. His wife doesn't have to hide her face or anything sinister lol. His kids are hooked on video games one plays soccer. They have no accent like he does they are already very Americanized lol.

It is obvious he isn't a radical Muslim at all. The guy works his ass off too. I mean this guy is amazing he could build a house for you in a month. It's obvious he was poor and escaped a nasty war. He is probably pretty lucky. I don't ask about it.

His mother is still alive and still over there. I doubt she is a threat. I'd hate for her to be blocked but agree she should be looked at closely for national security(that's security for ALL Americans Muslims included) reasons. And I asked him and he agrees.

Not all Muslims are out to get ya. Radicalized Muslims are a problem though without a doubt. Don't think they all are though, my coworker certainly isn't. This guy is paying a mortgage as well, no handouts. He is working towards the "American dream" for his kids. His wife busts her ass cleaning houses and apartments.

Good example. I grew up with a neighbor like that. Lebanese IIRC.

The point that is continually missed here -- and it seems deliberately missed/ignored --- is that ALL radical terrorists are a concern to be vetted, regardless what their religion happens to be or not be.

105 years ago tomorrow (for example) there was a huge terrorist shooting rampage/gun battle/burning building in London. Winston Churchill got a bullet in his hat. No "Muslims" involved as far as anybody knows -- but that doesn't make it somehow less dangerous. On the same date in 1920 the Palmer Raids rounded up six thousand people as potential "terrorists" here in the US. Lots of Russians and Italians -- not so much "Muslims".

Terrorism is terrorism. Asking them to stop and check a box so we can figure out which ones are this religion or that religion is a fool's errand, and childish.

what specifically do you want done regarding muslim/arab/refugee immigration? Give us specifics or STFU

How much more specific do you need?

"Muslim"(1) immigration simply is not an issue -- any more than "Buddhist immigration", "Atheist immigration" or "Lutheran immigration".

I'm not aware where Rump or anybody else brought up "Arabs" (2). Do you actually think they're synonyms?

Refugees (3) are fleeing chaos of war. You can read the sign on the Statue of Liberty for a cue there. As noted earlier, Canada's bringing them in by the planeload now, and when they arrive they see it as a source of national pride that they did it.

Let's get elemental.....

"Refugees" are not necessarily "Muslims" or "Arabs".
"Arabs" are not necessarily "Refugees" or "Muslims".
"Muslims" are not necessarily "Arabs" or "Refugees".

Broad brush much?