Greenland question, So we have ONLY three choices :

[22lcidw]

4. We mind our own business

We cannot because you guys exist.

 

[Litwin]

my only interest is in showing/finding if it is a consistent position or an ideological one.

i see i see, update:

 

[22lcidw]

1) reintegrates? When did Greenland stop being a territory of Denmark? Do you mean make Greenland a full-fledged part of Denmark the way France has made many of their former territories full-fledged departments?

2) extremely unlikely. Countries don’t just “sell” their territories to other nations anymore. This isn’t the 19th century

3) as much as I dislike Putin’s Russia, they’ve shown no sign of wanting Greenland

The so-called growth of the arctic ocean from ice says different with the Russian northern border.

 

[Litwin]

While everyone rants about Greenland, Canada is imploding. Trump may need to consider which is more important: an island that is nearly all icecap, or the neighbor that supplies oil, lumber, and maple syrup. Some new nation on Canadian land may later include Greenland.

update, trolling ?

 

[Alex_northern_germany]

1) In the 1970s, Greenland was formally administered as a province within Denmark. Over the following decades, a combination of domestic separatist movements, post‑colonial activism, and international political pressure—particularly from global ideological currents that encouraged decolonization—contributed to the establishment of Home Rule in 1979 and Self‑Government in 2009. These developments transformed Greenland into a highly autonomous Arctic territory rather than an ordinary Danish region. Today, approximately half of Greenland’s GDP comes from Danish financial transfers, while Greenland remains outside the Danish tax system. Despite ongoing COMMIES & Global South, Moscow &Hans empires pressure , Greenland enjoys levels of democracy, institutional stability, and living standards that were historically unknown in the Arctic region. These conditions stand in sharp contrast to the situation in Moscow’s Arctic colonies , which can only aspire to the freedoms, democratic institutions, and quality of life available in Greenland.
2) For the Moscow empire, Greenland is simply free real estate in one of the most strategic regions in the world. Remember, Greenland is not part of NATO. Local left‑wing separatists, supported by global‑south THUGS, pushed Greenland out of the NATO sphere.


RELATED :

Post in thread 'Putin - Jugend children's choir: "We will return Alaska to the motherland! (...) There'd be peace all around the World, but if Uncle Vova (Putin) call'

Oct 13, 2025

This is the AI translation:

• Litwin

• 

That´s not true, Greenland is part of the NATO.
An attack on Greenland would therefore trigger a casus foederis under Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty.

Loading…

en.wikipedia.org

Unlike Denmark proper, Greenland is not part of the European Union (EU). The country's status was changed to an Overseas Country and Territory (OCT) associated with the EU, a dependent territory that has a special relationship with a member state of the EU. However, Greenland remains a part of the Council of Europe and NATO as part of Denmark.

 

[cnm]

The Pedophile Protector just wants a trophy to hang in his Gold Room.

​

Denmark’s Army Chief Says He’s Ready to Defend Greenland​

Rasmus Jarlov, a Danish lawmaker, told me that the Trump administration has yet to articulate a single objective on Greenland, aside from acquiring it. “That’s the challenge we have,” Jarlov said. “And, of course, since they already have full access, it’s a little hard to improve.”​

​

“But,” the lawmaker added with a laugh, “we’re willing to try.”​

​

Lol. Good luck with that.

 

[Stann]

Greenland question , So we have ONLY three choices :

1. Greenland reintegrates with Denmark
2. Denmark sells Greenland to the USA
3. We do nothing, and Moscow takes over Greenland in the same way they tried in Hostomel, as Trump mentioned, two dog sleds won’t stop 10,000 of Moscow’s imperialistic, predatory spetsnaz.

In the 1970s, Greenland was a province of Denmark. Then our radical left, BLM- Marxists, commies, other radicals and The Free World haters, together with so called global‑south thugs, turned Greenland into a “national park,” where everyone now blames Denmark for living conditions, democracy that were historically unknown in the Arctic region. Around 50% of Greenland’s GDP comes from Danish subsidies, yet Greenland does not pay Danish taxes. I genuinely feel sorry for Moscow’s Arctic territories — they can only dream of the living standards, democracy, and freedoms that Greenland enjoys.
So which option do you prefer?
I voted - Greenland reintegrates with Denmark.

The Nation: Sakha-Yakut People's Fight for Freedom and Independence ​

There area lot more choices. The US could expand their present agreements with the US. Only an idiot would buy the cow when the milk is practically free anyway.

 

[Mac1958]

Greenland doesn't have to "reintegrate" with Denmark.

They're integrated, and they're just fine.

They're just being threatened by a predator country, a former friend that has turned.

 

[cnm]

Greenland doesn't have to "reintegrate" with Denmark.

They're integrated, and they're just fine.

They're just being threatened by a predator country, a former friend that has turned.

It was one of the best displays of hubris I've ever seen, especially after all the whining that the US has been prey.

 

[cnm]

Uh, no. This is blatantly false. The Native Americans in the US were allowed to have an entirely separate set of countries, police, governance, and society apart from the U.S.
The Greenlanders were very much coerced into assimilating with the Danish Realm.
This is a fact.

They were conquered and put on reservations in the worst lands. Do you really think everyone is as ignorant of history as you?

They were never sovereign, never able to issue internationally recognised passports, make international treaties, etc.

Lol, never able to make treaties the US would honour. Plus ça change...

 

[cnm]

It was one of the best displays of hubris I've ever seen, especially after all the whining that the US has been prey.

Miller is still a secondary school contrarian. The fauxtrage is the point.

 

[Litwin]

The US could expand their present agreements with the US.

The US could expand their present agreements with Denmark ? Agreed, it’s a good option. I don’t think D. Trump wants it.

 

[schmidlap]

Greenland question , So we have ONLY three choices :

1. Greenland reintegrates with Denmark
2. Denmark sells Greenland to the USA
3. We do nothing, and Moscow takes over Greenland in the same way they tried in Hostomel, as Trump mentioned, two dog sleds won’t stop 10,000 of Moscow’s imperialistic, predatory spetsnaz.

In the 1970s, Greenland was a province of Denmark. Then our radical left, BLM- Marxists, commies, other radicals and The Free World haters, together with so called global‑south thugs, turned Greenland into a “national park,” where everyone now blames Denmark for living conditions, democracy that were historically unknown in the Arctic region. Around 50% of Greenland’s GDP comes from Danish subsidies, yet Greenland does not pay Danish taxes. I genuinely feel sorry for Moscow’s Arctic territories — they can only dream of the living standards, democracy, and freedoms that Greenland enjoys.
So which option do you prefer?
I voted - Greenland reintegrates with Denmark.

The Nation: Sakha-Yakut People's Fight for Freedom and Independence ​

Free and independent democracies do not allow Trump, Putin, or any other tyrant to indulge his degeneracy.

Republicans vow to block Trump from seizing Greenland by force​

 

[Litwin]

Greenland doesn't have to "reintegrate" with Denmark.

They're integrated, and they're just fine.

They're just being threatened by a predator country, a former friend that has turned.

Greenland was a Danish province (a Danish county) in the 1970s, before BLM, our radical left, the so‑called Global South, and stupid local separatists pushed Greenland out of Denmark. That’s why today the juridical status of Greenland is in question for the US administration.

 

[Litwin]

Greenland is part of the NATO.

I was wrong, yes , Greenland is part of NATO through Denmark, and NATO is responsible for its defense.

 

[Anarchy666]

Greenland doesn't have to "reintegrate" with Denmark.

They're integrated, and they're just fine.

They're just being threatened by a predator country, a former friend that has turned.

Funny, one of your fellow liberals was arguing in a since-deleted post on the previous page that Greenland is not as integrated with Denmark as the Native Americans are with the U.S.
So, which is it?

 

[Litwin]

Free and independent democracies do not allow Trump, Putin, or any other tyrant to indulge his degeneracy.

Republicans vow to block Trump from seizing Greenland by force​

I see your point, but don’t put a democratic president in the same box as the Mongol tsar putin. Putin’s qazaliq — the campaigns in Chechnya, Moldova, Georgia, and Ukraine — serve to legitimize his claimed Mongol right to rule for the Mongol - Moscow imperialists. Each of these violent expeditions functions not only as conquest but as a ritual of political validation, echoing the old steppe tradition where raids established authority. Successful qazaliq does more than secure territory; it provides ideological justification for the existence of the Moscow empire itself. This is especially powerful in regions of Afro‑Asia where democracy is weak or absent, allowing Moscow to present itself as a rightful imperial center, sustained by force and myth rather than consent.

 

[Mac1958]

Funny, one of your fellow liberals was arguing in a since-deleted post on the previous page that Greenland is not as integrated with Denmark as the Native Americans are with the U.S.
So, which is it?

You don't know my politics.

<flick>

 

[schmidlap]

I see your point, but don’t put a democratic president in the same box as the Mongol tsar putin. Putin’s qazaliq — the campaigns in Chechnya, Moldova, Georgia, and Ukraine — serve to legitimize his claimed Mongol right to rule for the Mongol - Moscow imperialists. Each of these violent expeditions functions not only as conquest but as a ritual of political validation, echoing the old steppe tradition where raids established authority. Successful qazaliq does more than secure territory; it provides ideological justification for the existence of the Moscow empire itself. This is especially powerful in regions of Afro‑Asia where democracy is weak or absent, allowing Moscow to present itself as a rightful imperial center, sustained by force and myth rather than consent.

The salient certitude is that most Americans, by a large margin, reject the convicted felon's's lust for empire-building.

Very few Americans want the U.S. to seize Greenland or pay its residents to secede | YouGov

Majorities of Americans have positive views of U.S. relations with Greenland and Denmark and very few are supportive of the U.S. using military force to take over Greenland

today.yougov.com

 

[22lcidw]

Logically it makes sense to acquire Greenland. We would have anchors in the Northwest with Alaska and Northeast part with Greenland of North America at the northern limits. In the Western Hemisphere we would eventually need some representation at the Southern end of South America and even Antarctica at various points. This as a safety valve with the internal United States having issues with a percentage of its citizens which makes us less than safe.