The Muslims don't hate us for "our freedoms" or "our way of life" they are upset with the West for invading & bombing their countries, killing their loved ones and exploiting their natural resources. Many people in the “Christian West” do not understand their culture nor do they respect it. Prior to the discovery of oil and the establishment of the state of Israel, which was established it in the midst of Muslim/Arab countries and became what many in the Middle East & elsewhere viewed as an antagonizing entity because of their de-humanizing treatment of the Palestinians and the disparaging remarks made by Israeli leaders about Palestinians/Arabs, there was never the level turmoil being seen today in the Middle East.
It was the “Christian-Jewish West” that encroached on the Muslim-Arab lands with their armies and establishing military bases (
not the other way around) with which to protect/enforce the oil companies exploitation of their natural resources. The bribed leaders of the oil rich Muslim/Arab countries negotiated emigration/immigration deals with the governments of Britain, U.S. and France in exchange for SOFA (Status of Force Agreements) in the case of the U.S. military and oil company exploration & extraction agreements for big oil companies such BP, Total, and Exxon. This is the reason that Britain, France and the U.S. has seen a slow and steady rise in their population of Muslim/Arabs. Another reason contributing to the rise of Muslim/Arabs in Europe and North America are these wars of conquest waged on behalf of the wealthy avarice globalists and their oil companies coupled with wealthy avarice bankers, which has created millions of refugees. The liberal immigration policies, under the direction and control of the wealthy globalist elite, of Britain, France and the United States is intentionally creating a Clash of Civilizations.
The following is an excerpt from: ISR issue 15 | U.S. Intervention in the Middle East: Blood for Oil
Since the Second World War, the United States has been the dominant world power in the Middle East. Every U.S. policy shift, every military intervention, every CIA plot has been carried out to secure one main aim… to ensure the cheap and plentiful flow of the world’s most important energy resource…oil.
After the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, Britain and France drew the boundaries of the new states in the Middle East with absolutely no input from the people of the region. All promises of Arab independence the British had made to various local leaders during the First World War were scrapped. At the 1919 peace conference, when the victorious powers sat down to divvy up the spoils, foremost in their minds was the need to keep the region divided and thereby easier to control.
Private oil concerns pushed their governments (in the national interest, of course) to renounce all wartime promises to the Arabs. For the oilmen saw only too well that oil concessions and royalties would be easier to negotiate with a series of rival Arab states lacking any sense of unity, than with a powerful independent Arab state in the Middle East.
Britain took the areas that became Iraq, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia. France took Syria and Lebanon. Each state was then handed to local kings and sheiks who owed their position to British tutelage. Kuwait was handed to the al-Sabah family. After he was promised a united Arab republic, the Hashemite King Hussein was awarded Jordan. Britain gave Ibn Saud Saudi Arabia the only country in the world named after its ruling family. France put Lebanon in the hands of the Christian minority.
Journalist Glenn Frankel describes how British High Commissioner Sir Percy Cox settled boundaries between Iraq, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia at a 1922 conference in Baghdad:
The meeting had gone on for five grueling days with no compromise in sight. So one night in late November 1922, Cox, Britain's representative in Baghdad, summoned to his tent Sheik Abdul-Aziz ibn Saud, soon to become ruler of Saudi Arabia, to explain the facts of life as the British carved up the remnants of the defeated Ottoman empire.
"It was astonishing to see [ibn Saud] being reprimanded like a naughty schoolboy by His Majesty's High Commissioner and being told sharply that he, Sir Percy Cox, would himself decide the type and general line of the frontier," recalled Harold Dickson, the British military attaché to the region, in his memoirs.
"This ended the impasse. Ibn Saud almost broke down and pathetically remarked that Sir Percy was his father and mother who made him and raised him from nothing to the position he held and that he would surrender half his kingdom, nay the whole, if Sir Percy ordered."
Within two days, the deal was done. The modern borders of Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait were established by British Imperial fiat at what became known as the Uqauir Conference.
There was one unique exception to this arrangement. The 1917 Balfour Declaration had committed Britain to supporting the formation of a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine. When the postwar settlement made the country a British protectorate, Britain backed Jewish immigration to Palestine, hoping to create a "secure strategic outpost in an Arab world."
The British ruling class could see the value of creating a colonial-settler outpost that, dependent on British support, could become a loyal protector of British interests in the area. The full significance of the role of such an outpost would not become apparent, or fully taken advantage of by the U.S., until several years after the formation of the state of Israel in 1948.
"They" Hate Us Because We Bomb Them | Weapons of Mass Distraction
"They" Hate Us Because We Bomb Them | Weapons of Mass Destraction - YouTube
