Islam: Defeating The West Via The Womb

[Moonglow]

Muslims need more kids to carry more bombs

 

[Dragon]

And you've ascertained the root cause of population decline?

Got a theory about it. It involves the fact that the global population is exceeding carrying capacity and starting to run into resource limits for things like fresh water, game animals, and food production capacity. At the same time, the cost of oil is increasing, and this drives up the price of food because it makes fertilizer, fuel for farm machinery, and transportation of crops to market more expensive. With food prices increasing and availability decreasing, the cost of raising a child goes up and this creates a disincentive to have lots of kids.

At the same time, the status of women is increasing worldwide, giving women increasing control over their own fertility and resulting in lower birthrates.

All of these create what might be called a "free market" sort of response to the overpopulation problem, a spontaneous collective decision to lower birthrates that should eventually make UN population projections off and result in a leveling and decline at a lower total population.

Poor parts of the world and areas where women have lower status are changing more slowly than more advanced and sexually egalitarian areas, producing the appearance of a demographic imbalance in favor of the population of those poorer areas, including Muslim countries; the reality however is that all population growth is declining, but in some areas it's declining faster.

All of which means that, while environmentalists were right that overpopulation posed (and still does) a serious threat to the survival of civilization, there was in the end no need to impose draconian solutions such as China's one child policy (which China is coming to regret I believe). Humans are, after all, capable of making collective decisions that accord with ecological reality, and have reduced population growth just as our ancestors once increased it in early civilized times.

 

[Unkotare]

There is no "overpopulation problem," and your theory is full of holes.

 

[High_Gravity]

There is no "overpopulation problem," and your theory is full of holes.

I thought we did have a population problem, which is why the prices of things like food and milk have gone up.

 

[Unkotare]

We do not.

 

[Dragon]

There is no "overpopulation problem," and your theory is full of holes.

Yes there is, and you are still an asshole.

 

[High_Gravity]

The recent rapid increase in human population over the past two centuries has raised concerns that humans are beginning to overpopulate the Earth, and that the planet may not be able to sustain present or larger numbers of inhabitants. The population has been growing continuously since the end of the Black Death, around the year 1400;[citation needed] at the beginning of the 19th century, it had reached roughly 1,000,000,000 (1 billion). Increases in medical technology have led to rapid population growth on a worldwide level. Current projections show a steady decline in the population growth rate, with the population expected to reach between 8 and 10.5 billion between the year 2040[3][4] and 2050.[5] In May 2011, The United Nations increased the medium variant projections to 9.3 billion for 2050 and 10.1 billion for 2100.

Overpopulation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Unkotare]

There is no "overpopulation problem," and your theory is full of holes.

Yes there is, and you are still an asshole.

No, drama queen, there is not.

 

[Unkotare]

wiki-freakin-pedia?

 

[High_Gravity]

wiki-freakin-pedia?

Why not?

 

[Dr.Drock]

wiki-freakin-pedia?

Wikipedia provides their references, if you can go through and discredit their references on the page provided, then the eye roll will make sense.



But not until then.

 

[Dragon]

No, drama queen, there is not.

You have, as yet, presented no support for that statement beyond your own "authority." As such, there's no response required except, as noted, you're an asshole.

Now, present something of substance, something that shows some evidence or at least some thought behind it, and I'll give you a better response. This sort of crap, however, deserves none.

 

[Uncensored2008]

In the Thomas Harris book "Hannibal," the evil Hannibal Lecter convinces one of his victims to cut off his face and feed it to his dogs.

The white race is like that, we have been talked into voluntary genocide, in Europe and in the United States.

 

[Unkotare]

wiki-freakin-pedia?

Why not?

Why not just quote your cousin Earl? It would be as meaningful.

 

[Unkotare]

In the Thomas Harris book "Hannibal," the evil Hannibal Lecter convinces one of his victims to cut off his face and feed it to his dogs.

The white race is like that, we have been talked into voluntary genocide, in Europe and in the United States.

Well, you're not too fucking crazy, are you?

 

[Unkotare]

No, drama queen, there is not.

You have, as yet, presented no support for that statement beyond your own "authority.".

You got it backwards, jacksass. You made the assertion, I just pointed out that you are wrong. I could point out the lack of mass starvation die-offs on every corner of the globe, the massive surpluses of agricultural produce in many countries, the history of ever-increasing yields, the fact that populations are in decline in most developed countries, and any number of other things but that is not necessary since YOU made the assertion.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Why not just quote your cousin Earl? It would be as meaningful.

Wikipedia is more accurate than the Encyclopedia Britannica..

 

[Unkotare]

Why not just quote your cousin Earl? It would be as meaningful.

Wikipedia is more accurate than the Encyclopedia Britannica..

Shut up, you're fucking insane.

 

[High_Gravity]

wiki-freakin-pedia?

Why not?

Why not just quote your cousin Earl? It would be as meaningful.

Why do you hate wiki?

 

[Unkotare]

I don't "hate" it. It is amusing, but not a legitimate source.