Esmeralda
Diamond Member
Trump is not the new Hitler: he's not smart enough.
He's the new Papa Doc. The white Papa Doc.
.jpg/220px-Duvalier_(cropped).jpg)
Is Trump the new Hitler?
- Thread starter Mortimer
- Start date
Trump is not the new Hitler: he's not smart enough.
He's the new Papa Doc. The white Papa Doc.
Mortimer
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #22
Well I worded it wrong, Trump is not "Hitler" Trump didnt commit genocide did nothing wrong or broke human rights etc. I meant only why he is worshipped as if he is Hitler, its personality worship like you see in third world dictatorships, and they call him God Emperor Trump. Some of his supporters reinforce that image that he is Hitler. If I wear a nazi uniform most likely I want to give myself the image that Im a nazi right?
Not to worry, Mortimer. Trump is AOK.
Remodeling Maidiac
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #24
Where do all of you MORONS come from? Is there a breeding farm in California?
Trump is the exact opposite of those idiots.
mdk
Diamond Member
- Sep 6, 2014
- 40,558
- 14,046
- 2,630
Who gives a shit what some fringe fools prattle in public!? I don't take them very seriously. Words are wind. If they start to get froggy then we'll talk; however, at present, it's just blustering bullshit.
mdk
Diamond Member
- Sep 6, 2014
- 40,558
- 14,046
- 2,630
The audience seems to be doing it though.
Fun fact: "Hail victory" is literally what sieg heil means.
Grandma
Geezer Chick
- Moderator
- #29
Trump isn't Hitler because he's not smart enough.
That's not to say that he can't enable the next Hitler. There's a lot of hatred out there, those that act on it will do it in his name.
And Trump not being Hitler doesn't mean that his Administration won't be a disaster.
That's not to say that he can't enable the next Hitler. There's a lot of hatred out there, those that act on it will do it in his name.
And Trump not being Hitler doesn't mean that his Administration won't be a disaster.
buckeye45_73
Lakhota's my *****
- Jun 4, 2011
- 33,811
- 7,332
- 1,130
Why should he care? Commies praise democrats too.
I mean is he more hitler than every republican the left says it about?
And the next republican to run im sure will be much worse, like it is in every election
Let us know when.you want to talk issues, we dont have time for this stupid bullshit.
Yarddog
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2014
- 19,075
- 13,564
- 2,405
No i dont think so but I really do believe the opposing party wants him to be. They also control most of the news media. Trump will have a very hard time as President for that reason alone
ThunderKiss1965
Diamond Member
The historical ignorance is breath taking.
xband
Gold Member
- Jan 5, 2016
- 6,200
- 1,467
- 140
ThunderKiss1965
Diamond Member
Does he need to do it with one foot 6" off the ground or maybe rubbing his belly while patting the top of his head.
JQPublic1
Gold Member
- Aug 10, 2012
- 14,220
- 1,544
- 280
I agree.
- Moderator
- #36
Fuck off and die, he's been doing it all along, less than 300 people shouldn't even be on his radar, he's got a new government to get ready. The is just another Alt radical left weapon of mass distraction.
JQPublic1
Gold Member
- Aug 10, 2012
- 14,220
- 1,544
- 280
Whoa! DOn't start back tracking NOW. Hitler wasn't a murderer either until he gained power. Trump seems to be following in that pattern by appointing unabashed racists to key positions in his administration. Appointing Sessions as his AG sends a message to all that when he takes over Ni**er season is ON! A RW stacked Supreme Court will ensure his national Stop and Frisk polices can be implemented without legal repercussions. Murder by cop of unarmed Black men will likely increase tenfold and thereby turning the clock back to the days when such atrocities were commonplace.
I'm a libertarian who supported neither Trump nor Hillary, but the left's hysteria over Trump's win has been something to behold. I'm sure he'll be a disastrous president in many ways, but the thing that animates the Left's animus towards Trump is that he is someone who represents an existential threat to their sacred institutions (the media, entertainment, academia) and signals that they are becoming less and less relevant.
Make no mistake, most of the Left's opinion-molders don't actually think Donald will deport ALL undocumented workers, round up gays and Jews and whoever else and throw them into camps. This is all orchestrated hysteria.
In this particular instance, we see a very common tactic employed selectively by the Left. If a right-wing politician who is not sufficiently controlled by the establishment starts to gain political power, they associate him with the worst of his supporters and sanctimoniously demand that he "denounce" the degenerate supporters. Every time CNN or some other outlet speaks about David Duke's praise of Donald Trump, it encourages the viewer to consciously or subconsciously associate Trump and conservatives with overt racism, with the KKK and with Nazism.
It never works the other way though. During the Primary season, the Communist Party USA chairman John Bachtell endorsed Hillary Clinton. He, and other self-described Communist Party chairmen and members also endorsed Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012. Shouldn't Obama and Hillary they be hounded to repudiate these endorsements if we are adhering to the same standard?
Communism has produced profound misery in the world. Estimates have been made that Communism caused the deaths of between 60 Million and as many as 100 Million people during the 20th Century. I'm not at all claiming that Hillary and Barack ARE communists, but more than a few devout adherents see them as fellow travelers who will advance their agenda in some capacity.
The vile organization known as the Ku Klux Klan, and the odious ideology of White Nationalism has caused comparably less deaths, especially in modern times. In contemporary America, the numbers of actual adherents to either the Klan or some form of white nationalist ideology are extremely small in number. They are social pariahs in almost every community.
I don't care which candidate you pick, you can easily find some disreputable person or organization that supports them. In point of fact, though, the KKK and White Nationalism serves more as a convenient bogey man than as a real threat to ordinary people in this day and age.
Although my initiate caveat should serve as sufficient, I want to reiterate that I don't support Donald Trump or nearly any of his policy proposals (the few that are actually coherent). I am a libertarian who supported Ron Paul in the GOP Primaries in 2008 and 2012. I voted for Ralph Nader in 2008, Gary Johnson in 2012 and Jill Stein in 2016. I voted for Nader and Stein for their strong anti-war positions and because there weren't any decent libertarians running in those election cycles.
Make no mistake, most of the Left's opinion-molders don't actually think Donald will deport ALL undocumented workers, round up gays and Jews and whoever else and throw them into camps. This is all orchestrated hysteria.
In this particular instance, we see a very common tactic employed selectively by the Left. If a right-wing politician who is not sufficiently controlled by the establishment starts to gain political power, they associate him with the worst of his supporters and sanctimoniously demand that he "denounce" the degenerate supporters. Every time CNN or some other outlet speaks about David Duke's praise of Donald Trump, it encourages the viewer to consciously or subconsciously associate Trump and conservatives with overt racism, with the KKK and with Nazism.
It never works the other way though. During the Primary season, the Communist Party USA chairman John Bachtell endorsed Hillary Clinton. He, and other self-described Communist Party chairmen and members also endorsed Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012. Shouldn't Obama and Hillary they be hounded to repudiate these endorsements if we are adhering to the same standard?
Communism has produced profound misery in the world. Estimates have been made that Communism caused the deaths of between 60 Million and as many as 100 Million people during the 20th Century. I'm not at all claiming that Hillary and Barack ARE communists, but more than a few devout adherents see them as fellow travelers who will advance their agenda in some capacity.
The vile organization known as the Ku Klux Klan, and the odious ideology of White Nationalism has caused comparably less deaths, especially in modern times. In contemporary America, the numbers of actual adherents to either the Klan or some form of white nationalist ideology are extremely small in number. They are social pariahs in almost every community.
I don't care which candidate you pick, you can easily find some disreputable person or organization that supports them. In point of fact, though, the KKK and White Nationalism serves more as a convenient bogey man than as a real threat to ordinary people in this day and age.
Although my initiate caveat should serve as sufficient, I want to reiterate that I don't support Donald Trump or nearly any of his policy proposals (the few that are actually coherent). I am a libertarian who supported Ron Paul in the GOP Primaries in 2008 and 2012. I voted for Ralph Nader in 2008, Gary Johnson in 2012 and Jill Stein in 2016. I voted for Nader and Stein for their strong anti-war positions and because there weren't any decent libertarians running in those election cycles.
Clementine
Platinum Member
- Dec 18, 2011
- 12,919
- 4,826
- 350
This is too fucking stupid. Some small, radical group does this and the media latch on like it's half the country. Get a grip!
Clementine
Platinum Member
- Dec 18, 2011
- 12,919
- 4,826
- 350
Terrorist-supporting Muslim leaders donated heavily to Hillary's campaign and the Clinton Foundation. Did she make them do it or is she not like that herself?
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
Illinois school district practices racial segregation discrimination and assocciates whiteness with the devil- Started by Mortimer
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
Trump and Hegseth Focused on Culture War as Violent Conflicts Spread Worldwide- Started by C_Clayton_Jones
- Replies: 13
