is this how i'm to interpret geopolitics?

peacefan

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2018
Messages
4,919
Reaction score
1,538
Points
210
Location
Amsterdam, Netherlands
war is a stupid activity.
but occasionally, outside forces will force one into it anyway.

is that how i'm to interpret geopolitics?
the richest playing chess and other board games with real lives and treasure?
 
war is a stupid activity.
but occasionally, outside forces will force one into it anyway.

is that how i'm to interpret geopolitics?
the richest playing chess and other board games with real lives and treasure?
welcome to earth, peacefan, hope you enjoy your stay.
 
war is a stupid activity.
but occasionally, outside forces will force one into it anyway.

is that how i'm to interpret geopolitics?
the richest playing chess and other board games with real lives and treasure?
No. You support every war ginned up by the empire to benefit the 1%, yet claim you're for peace. :uhoh3: :cuckoo: :ahole-1:
 
war is a stupid activity.
but occasionally, outside forces will force one into it anyway.

is that how i'm to interpret geopolitics?
the richest playing chess and other board games with real lives and treasure?
But
Note how the means of war have changed so much.,

You do not have to be wounding , maiming , killing all the time .

Best example , Mind Control .
Let alone Markets Control , and information hacking plus issue of misinformation and disinformation .

Now you are forced into new and different distinctions
 
No. You support every war ginned up by the empire to benefit the 1%, yet claim you're for peace. :uhoh3: :cuckoo: :ahole-1:
that's a blatant lie.
for a while i supported Russia's black sea-, crimea- and donbass "claims".
but since the US admin kept ignoring me, i started a shift towards a pro-Ukranian attitude.
 
Last edited:
But
Note how the means of war have changed so much.,

You do not have to be wounding , maiming , killing all the time .

Best example , Mind Control .
Let alone Markets Control , and information hacking plus issue of misinformation and disinformation .

Now you are forced into new and different distinctions
evil begets more evil.
 
No. You support every war ginned up by the empire to benefit the 1%, yet claim you're for peace. :uhoh3: :cuckoo: :ahole-1:
this also brings up the relevant question : why fight for the 1%?
because the 1% manage the economy, which is one of the foundations of civil society.
and even on their yachts, they're quite vulnerable to the whims of war themselves, due to the need to come to shore for supplies.
 
that's a blatant lie.
for a while i supported Russia's black sea-, crimea- and donbass "claims".
but since the US admin kept ignoring me, i started a shift towards a pro-Ukranian attitude.

Where is the logic in that attitude and action ?

What you are saying in simple terms is that nobody but a few of us agreed that two plus two equals four.
Life became unbearable as ridicule increased .

So , for convenience and peace I accepted that two and two make five .
 
Where is the logic in that attitude and action ?

What you are saying in simple terms is that nobody but a few of us agreed that two plus two equals four.
Life became unbearable as ridicule increased .

So , for convenience and peace I accepted that two and two make five .
i fail to understand you here.
 
this also brings up the relevant question : why fight for the 1%?
because the 1% manage the economy, which is one of the foundations of civil society.
and even on their yachts, they're quite vulnerable to the whims of war themselves, due to the need to come to shore for supplies.
Not relevant. Irrelevant. You always support war Warfan.
 
it's far more relevant than you can comprehend or are able to admit publicly.
Only to a fool who believes we must fight and die to protect the 1%, who does such great things. LMFAO!

I fear you have an IQ under 10 Warfan.
 
Last edited:
accepting cognitive dissonance for what it is peace....~S~
treat your problems as a collection of paradoxes depicted on the sides of N-sided dice and voila; someone can hold a multifude of paradoxes at the price of one's hapiness levels in a temporary manner.
 
Last edited:
15th post
the 1% and 10% top of the economic ladder don't deserve to be killed like lambs.

actually it hovers between 90 and 130.
Lol. Who said they need to be killed like lambs, other than you? Why are you so deceptive? Are you a statist journalist or CIA?

Your IQ is obviously very low. Stop lying.
 
Back
Top Bottom