11.The multiples of crimes by race:
“The African/European ratios in Table 2 are extremely large. The median African/ European ratio was 9.0, the simple mean was 9.6, and the mean weighted by population was 11.2. In the three megalopolises – New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago – the ratios were 11.6, 9.0, and 14.5 respectively. In the nation’s capital, the ratio was 19.9.[ 20 times more lawless than whites.]
Table 2
omits ratios involving Asians because very low Asian crime rates yielded absurdly large ratios in most of the thirteen cities. For example, Fort Lauderdale recorded just one arrest of an Asian for a violent offense from 2015 through 2019 among the 3,000 Asians who lived there during that period. But Asian arrest rates were exceptionally low even in most cities with large Asian populations. The lone exception to the rule was New York, where the Asian violent crime rate was marginally higher than the European one.
The Latin/European ratios were smaller than the African/European ratios, but usually big enough to be significant, with a weighted mean of 3.2 across all thirteen cities. As in the case of the African ratios, the Latin ratios were biggest in the largest and most important cities. In New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Washington, the ratios were 4.1, 2.4, 2.9, and 6.3 respectively. The
Latin/European ratios look small only by comparison with the African/European ratios. If the arrest data accurately represent race differences in violent offenses, Table 2 makes the point of this chapter.” Charles Murray
Can we live together? Is it possible to alter these statistics, change them to produce that ‘equality ‘ of results that the Democrats claim that they desire.
Or is there a reason(s) why they will be maintained at these levels.
Purposely.
Don't forget....the Democrat LATimes says the Right has "
repeatedly twisted crime statistics to portray Black people as more violent than whites — a theme for white supremacists."
Democrats lie about everything.