The Reader should recognize that the phrase: Natural Born Citizen, is as readily defined today, as it was when the Framers established it as one of the three requirements to hold the office of the President of the US:
Webster's Dictionary, a long established, objective resource, defines the words which comprise this standard as follows:
Natural: As a consequence of the nature of something; existing in or caused by nature; not made or caused by humankind.
Born: existing as a result of birth
Citizen: a legally recognized subject or national of a state...
So when we place those concepts together it looks like this: Natural Born Citizen: Citizenship as a consequence of, or caused by the nature of birth by those individuals legally recognized as subjects or nationals of a state; not caused by human acts.
The Presidency is the ONLY office which is held to this standard, as the Presidency is the only office which the Constitution requires to defend the principles intrinsic to the constitution, thus where the President were to be loyal to foreign ideas, he could easily turn the nation from adherence to the Constitution, as we have seen time and again from obama, who was born to a Foreign National and who wrote a book informing the readers of such of his loyalties to the foreign ideas of his Father, over the 'negative rights' he finds in the constitution.
Thus the purpose for the phrase Natural Born Citizen, was to preclude, to the extent possible, the means for individuals with an inherent division of loyalties as a result of the intrinsic influence of a foreign national parent, to sit in the office of the US Presidency.
Thus the requirement was set, to require the President of the United States, singularly to be a citizen, whose citizenship was the natural result of the joining of one male citizen and one female citizen.
What the Left wants you to believe is that the Framers established the requirement that that President of the United States, to merely be a citizen, who happened to be born, naturally, here in the US... Which for all intents and purposes, is roughly that same standard required to hold any Federal office and in no way lends any additional tendency toward promoting any greater alliance to American principle.
Which, is in keeping with the Left's perverse species of reasoning, which has provided us with noteworthy policies as: "The RIGHT to murder pre-born children, claiming such on the lofty moral justification of CHOICE".
LOL! Then there's the policy which requires that Men should marry men, because there is no scientific evidence that human physiology requires that the male is designed to join with the female, thus men joining with men is PERFECTLY NORMAL!
And there's the Economic "SCIENCE!", which says that paying people to NOT WORK, will stimulate those people to seek employment.
The thing to understand is that the Framers set into the law, nearly two and a half centuries ago, that the President of the United States must be a person born from two citizens, one male and one female... who joined together, conceived a child and as a consequence of their union, a new citizen was born.
And that is a threat to the Left on two fronts:
First it shows the Framers recognition of Marriage as being the joining of one man and one woman.
Second, it demonstrates the Framers cognizance that Foreign Ideas Hostile to American Principles, is a direct threat to the US Constitution and never MORE a threat than where those ideas are intrinsic to the Person designated to defend those principles and the Constitution which set them as the rules by which the country is to be governed.
And THAT defines obama out of eligibility for the Presidency and deals the Sexually Abnormal out of the Marriage equation.
