To begin, I believe itās worth noting that āredistributiveā government āprogramsā such as āpoor lawsā and public education (or even Roman ābread and circusesā) predate Karl Marx. But it seems that since Karl Marxās writings about government/workers seizing control off all private enterprise, a lot of people have equated any redistributive government intervention in social issues as āMarxistā. Now what Iām curious about, is how prevalent this view is amongst people, or if perhaps they draw some kind of philosophical line between what kind of government āprogramā is Marxist, and what isnāt. So I figured a way to test my curiosity would be to run a poll using the classic government program of Medicare.
Sources I've read assert that on average people draw between 3 and 4.4 times as much value out of the program as they put in. Source:
Did You Really Pay For Your Medicare Benefits?
I think it counts as redistributive in that the gap must be filled somewhere (whether by taxing some people more, or by our grandkids paying the debts). So my poll question is simple really: in your opinion, is Medicare a Marxist program?
Sources I've read assert that on average people draw between 3 and 4.4 times as much value out of the program as they put in. Source:
Did You Really Pay For Your Medicare Benefits?
I think it counts as redistributive in that the gap must be filled somewhere (whether by taxing some people more, or by our grandkids paying the debts). So my poll question is simple really: in your opinion, is Medicare a Marxist program?