A lot of the Crazy Democrat Cultists love war because they are War Profiteers.
Some of the Crazy Democrat Cultists hate Trump so much that they don't want Trump to have a successful peace deal.
Zelenskyy is not defending freedom or democracy.
Zelenskyy has canceled elections and censored his opposition.
Ukraine is a one-party totalitarian police state.
Mark Kelly is supporting a one-party totalitarian police state, not "freedom"
Oh boy, where do we even start with
TroglocratsRdumb here? First off, let’s talk about his username, which already screams,
“I have the political depth of a bumper sticker.” But hey, let’s humor him and take a wrecking ball to this stack of dishonest, gish-galloping garbage he calls an argument.
Point One: "A lot of the Crazy Democrat Cultists love war because they are War Profiteers."
Oh, the old “Democrats are war profiteers” routine. Classic. Never mind that the biggest war-happy profiteers in the last half-century have been Republicans. You remember that little thing called Iraq? The Cheney family retirement fund? The Pentagon contractor orgy under Bush? Or how about Trump himself, who skipped Vietnam but played footsie with defense contractors like a cheap Vegas date? But sure, it’s the
Democrats who love war. If hypocrisy were an Olympic sport, you’d be breaking world records.
Point Two: "Some of the Crazy Democrat Cultists hate Trump so much that they don't want Trump to have a successful peace deal."
Let’s break this down: what
peace deal are you hallucinating here? Trump never had a peace deal. He had a
photo op with North Korea, got played like a harmonica, and then went back to rage-tweeting about windmills. His “peace deal” in Ukraine was just letting Putin do whatever he wanted. That’s not a deal--that’s called
surrender. You don’t get points for promising the bully your lunch money and calling it “negotiation.”
Point Three: "Zelenskyy is not defending freedom or democracy."
Right, because when a country is literally
fighting off an invasion, they should totally just hold elections like it’s a PTA meeting.
“Sorry, folks, can’t repel this missile barrage right now, I’m busy organizing a debate night.” Ukraine is in a state of war--you know, like Lincoln suspending habeas corpus in the Civil War, like Churchill imposing emergency measures in WWII. Funny how you guys never call those “totalitarian.” But when Zelenskyy defends his country, suddenly
he’s the bad guy? Get real.
Point Four: "Zelensky has canceled elections and censored his opposition."
Oh,
this again. First off, Ukrainian elections are postponed because of the war--which, by the way, was started by Russia. The only people trying to “cancel” Ukrainian democracy are Russian tanks. And let’s talk about “censorship.” Ukraine cracked down on Russian-backed opposition
during an invasion--which is what
every country in history has done when under siege. You don’t get to invite enemy propaganda in during a war and call it “freedom of speech.” That’s like inviting termites into your house and calling it
open-concept living.
Point Five: "Ukraine is a one-party totalitarian police state."
Oh, I see, the country fighting for its literal survival is a
totalitarian state, but Putin’s Russia, where journalists mysteriously fall out of windows and opposition leaders get
poisoned, jailed, or just disappear, is somehow the
bastion of liberty? Get the hell out of here. Ukraine has political pluralism, multiple parties, and a press that
actually criticizes the government--unlike Russia, where if you criticize Putin, you get a free tour of a Siberian labor camp.
Point Six: "Mark Kelly is supporting a one-party totalitarian police state, not 'freedom.'"
Oh, this is rich. Mark Kelly,
a U.S. Navy combat pilot, astronaut, and elected senator, is a traitor because he
supports a country resisting a hostile invasion? And who’s your
model of a real patriot? Some MAGA clown whining about 5G and chemtrails on Telegram? Kelly has done more for democracy than you’ve done for coherent thought. He’s been to space--
twice--which is still further than any of your arguments have gone.
So, let’s sum it up:
every single one of your points is a pile of revisionist, bad-faith, Putin-fluffing nonsense. Your entire argument is a desperate dodge from the OP’s point: Musk called a literal American war hero a
traitor for standing by an ally under attack. And instead of addressing
that, you just regurgitate a list of nonsense straight from the Kremlin playbook.
Kelly has more patriotism in his pinky finger than Musk has in his entire Emerald Mine Trust Fund body. And you? You’re just another dime-store propagandist who thinks parroting authoritarian talking points makes you sound informed. It doesn’t. It makes you sound like a useful idiot.