Is Kamala just a complete and total flat out fraud as an attorney?

[EMH]

It's your claim, you prove it.

the only "proof" is PROOF SHE DID PRACTICE LAW, and YOUR SIDE DOES NOT HAVE THAT.... because SHE NEVER DID.

 

[EMH]

I've seen some pretty stupid attorneys in my days. In fact, I have single handidly taken a few on myself over the years here and there and won.

dumber than Kamala?

There are dumb attorneys. Kamala is off the scale...

 

[Hellbilly]

All you have to do is document... but you and your side cannot do that, just as you cannot refute one word of EMH's climate posts.

Too lazy to do your own research or afraid of what you might find?

 

[EMH]

Too lazy to do your own research or afraid of what you might find?

Not my research that is needed. The Kamala side needs to show us one single example of kamala practicing law, and, to date...

IT IS UNABLE TO DO THAT....

the question then becomes WHY....

 

[Hellbilly]

The Kamala side needs to show us one single example of kamala practicing law, and, to date...

Nope. They don’t need to prove anything to anyone including you.

 

[EMH]

Nope. They don’t need to prove anything to anyone including you.

You can try that with the voters.

Obviously many here who do support Kamala are panicking and lying, but once again, almost a week later...


THERE IS NOT ONE SINGLE EXAMPLE OF KAMALA PRACTICING LAW


suggesting SHE DOES NOT KNOW HOW....

 

[Luckyone]

Many people wonder, is Kamala really smart enough to be an attorney? What kind of a word salad would a jury buy? Would any judge put up with her laughable dodges and changing the subject, and then repeating the same words over and over?


DID KAMALA EVER ACTUALLY PRACTICE LAW?
For a PROSECUTOR, that means PROSECUTING A CASE, ONE CASE, JUST ONE....



They indicate that they have no trial transcripts of Kamala's work when she was employed at the City Attorney's Office before her ascent to the office of elected DA



How did she get her first job as a prosecutor?

By being an outstanding legal scholar? Um, no.
By demonstrating cunning strategic legal thinking? Um, no.

She got her first job because she was "pals" with Willie Brown...

https://www.google.com/search?q=kamala+willie+brown&rlz=1C5CHFA_enUS1003US1003&oq=kamala+willie+br&aqs=chrome.0.0i433i455i512j69i57j69i60l2&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

So we must insist, there must be SOME EVIDENCE SOMEWHERE that Kamala has actually PRACTICED LAW instead of ordering her subordinates to pack the SF prisons with overwhelmingly black male marijuana users....


YOU ARE CALLED. KAMALA IS NOW ACCUSED OF BEING A TOTAL FRAUD OF IN ANY WAY EVER PRACTICING LAW. SHE IS JUST A BRAINLESS BIMBO PUPPET WHO CANNOT EVEN ARGUE A SIMPLE CASE IN COURT.... which begs the question HOW DID SHE PASS THE BAR, DID SHE....

It's incredible that you put up such a post suggesting that Harris did nothing as a prosecutor.

All I did is go to Google and put in "did Kamala ever proscute a case and this is what I got:

The answer is "yes" and she did have some success against some big companies, such as when she did this:

5. Harris vs. big banks in the mortgage meltdown​

Harris’ entry into the national spotlight came at the tail end of the Great Recession in 2011, when as California’s attorney general, she rejected a settlement offer from five major mortgage lenders — one other states agreed to.

It could have jeopardized the deal, but her brinkmanship worked: The banks kicked in a lot more, allowing California to collect about $20 billion, from an initial settlement offer of $4 billion.

The agreement meant Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Wells Fargo & Co., Citigroup Inc. and Ally Financial Inc. collectively reduced $12 billion in principal on loans or offered short sales to about 250,000 California homeowners who owed more on their mortgages than their houses were worth.

Your OP is biased and full of misinformation.

 

[Luckyone]

You can try that with the voters.

Obviously many here who do support Kamala are panicking and lying, but once again, almost a week later...


THERE IS NOT ONE SINGLE EXAMPLE OF KAMALA PRACTICING LAW


suggesting SHE DOES NOT KNOW HOW....

See post #67

 

[EMH]

It's incredible that you put up such a post suggesting that Harris did nothing as a prosecutor.

All I did is go to Google and put in "did Kamala ever proscute a case and this is what I got:

View attachment 1029934

The answer is "yes" and she did have some success against some big companies, such as when she did this:

5. Harris vs. big banks in the mortgage meltdown​

Harris’ entry into the national spotlight came at the tail end of the Great Recession in 2011, when as California’s attorney general, she rejected a settlement offer from five major mortgage lenders — one other states agreed to.

It could have jeopardized the deal, but her brinkmanship worked: The banks kicked in a lot more, allowing California to collect about $20 billion, from an initial settlement offer of $4 billion.

The agreement meant Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Wells Fargo & Co., Citigroup Inc. and Ally Financial Inc. collectively reduced $12 billion in principal on loans or offered short sales to about 250,000 California homeowners who owed more on their mortgages than their houses were worth.

Your OP is biased and full of misinformation.

That's hiding in the closet again.

Behind closed doors, others are making those decisions for her, those who FUNDED HER, the ho.

You need to show one single example of Kamala in court practicing law in front of judge and jury and live audience, not politicized staffers and lobbyists doing her work for her.

 

[EMH]

See post #67

"she prosecuted" in that case means SHE TOLD ANOTHER PROSECUTOR TO PROSECUTE, AND SHE, meaning KAMALA, NEVER SET FOOT IN THE COURTROOM.

 

[Man With A Plan]

And there is no proof that she wasn't in the courtroom! Listen fuckhead, let's say for the sake of argument, she wasn't in the courtroom, she is still more qualified to be President than a failed reality TV star.

There's no proof that "I" wasn't in the courtroom either, Billo but that doesn't mean I was!
What executive experience does Harris bring? Has she ever started a business? Ever run a State? Ever run a city?

 

[Man With A Plan]

There is proof her office prosecuted cases. There is no proof she was not in the courtroom. Yet that is the claim.

If you make a claim, you are obligated to provide the premise for your conclusion.

So her "office" prosecuted cases but were those prosecutions handled by other lawyers? It would appear that if Kamala Harris stepped foot in a courtroom it was to watch ANOTHER lawyer prosecute a case for her office!

 

[Luckyone]

That's hiding in the closet again.

Behind closed doors, others are making those decisions for her, those who FUNDED HER, the ho.

You need to show one single example of Kamala in court practicing law in front of judge and jury and live audience, not politicized staffers and lobbyists doing her work for her.

I don't need to do anything. I am contesting your post that she did nothing and the links included show that she did. It is that simple

By the way, you are not head of a department for 15 years and not do anything

 

[Man With A Plan]

I don't need to do anything. I am contesting your post that she did nothing and the links included show that she did. It is that simple

By the way, you are not head of a department for 15 years and not do anything

I hate to break this to you, Lucky but in Government we have literally hundreds of people that are Heads of Departments that have done nothing for decades. It's almost impossible to be fired if you're a Civil Servant in the US.

 

[Luckyone]

"she prosecuted" in that case means SHE TOLD ANOTHER PROSECUTOR TO PROSECUTE, AND SHE, meaning KAMALA, NEVER SET FOOT IN THE COURTROOM.

She was head of the department for 15 years. Evidently she was "good enough" to be in that position for that long

 

[Man With A Plan]

She was head of the department for 15 years. Evidently she was "good enough" to be in that position for that long

Never heard of the "Peter Principle" have you, Lucky?

 

[Luckyone]

Never heard of the "Peter Principle" have you, Lucky?

What to know about Kamala Harris' record as California attorney general​

 

[Billo_Really]

the only "proof" is PROOF SHE DID PRACTICE LAW, and YOUR SIDE DOES NOT HAVE THAT.... because SHE NEVER DID.

This is a bullshit
, right wing claim.

 

[Leo123]

At least she doesn't suck Putin's dick!

She would if she could.

 

[EMH]

the links included show that she did

NO, they DO NOT. They show HER OFFICE did stuff, not her.

you are not head of a department for 15 years and not do anything

Appointed to a post for sleeping with a married 80 year old mayor in government, YES YOU CAN do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING and sit there threatening anyone who notices with RACIST AND SEXIST accusations... which is what she did do...

Someone in SF made Paul Pelosi's assaults on young boys above the law....