geauxtohell
Choose your weapon.
Point 1: Really? I didn't see that on his website. Perhaps you could link to where you saw that in his platform?
Okay, it was a little hyberbolic. My point is that it's not like this is something Bill Maher pulled out of his archives from the 90s and broadcast. Santorum is the one who brought this into the discussion himself.
Point 2: No, it shows the pathetic state of the OP and that they have nothing else constructive to say, so they whine about this.
Again, Santorum is the one who brought this into the discussion. He's the one who said that sex should always be for procreation, that sex only for pleasure is bad, and that these are important policy issues, and that as President he would address these issues. He also turned around 60 seconds later and said that he's not running for Pastor, so I don't know what to beliYeve anymore when it comes out of Santorum's mouth. But the point is that he's put himself out there on this platform. It's acceptable to discuss the candidate's platform that he's professed. It's just ridiculous that it's even possible for such a candidate to exist, outside of a gag candidate.
and unless you have some actual proof that he will attempt to ban sex for pleasure because of his belief in this area, this thread and your argument are garbage.
You seem incapable of realizing there is a difference between a political platform, and a religious belief.
In the 2000 Presidential Election, Bush's official platform was "no nation building". But we knew he had a grudge against Saddam for trying to kill his father.
12 years later we are just now getting out of Iraq.
The moral of the story: Personal beliefs matter and are fair game in discussing candidates.