Is it unifying or sensible to appoint/nominate leaders for their skin color, genitalia or sexual preference? Do other world leaders operate like this?

[candycorn]

thanks----trump's thing was a little less stupid

lol...

 

[candycorn]

Hey guys, I am going to hire a new member of my team. It's going to be a white male. No other GENDERS OR RACES NEED APPLY

Ridiculous, right?

Communists do not care.

From your profile pic...it seems like you're doing a lot with white males. Is that you on the left or right?

 

[martybegan]

Make sure you bend your knees when you move the goalposts like that.

Two different situations, no goalposts needed to be moved.

 

[Independent thinker]

Do other leaders of nations use skin color, genitalia and sexual preference as qualifying criteria for their appointments and nominations?
What do ‘independents‘ / fence sitters think of such a methodology?

Being inclusive just means being inclusive. It has nothing to do with hiring the best people for the job. Let's just all get along and be happy. We don't really need the best person for jobs.

 

[Moonglow]

Did Trump expressly limit his short list to women only?

Only the ones he wanted to work "under" him.

 

[Moonglow]

Being inclusive just means being inclusive. It has nothing to do with hiring the best people for the job. Let's just all get along and be happy. We don't really need the best person for jobs.

If they hired the best many of the so-called best would not be in their current position.

 

[WEATHER53]

Other world leaders have not become consumed with dog and pony shows to show how “caring” they are.

 

[Seawytch]

Do other leaders of nations use skin color, genitalia and sexual preference as qualifying criteria for their appointments and nominations?
What do ‘independents‘ / fence sitters think of such a methodology?

Ask Saint Ronald of Reagan...

Biden is not the first president to promise to select his nominee from a specific demographic group. (Published 2022)

President Biden’s pledge to nominate a Black woman to the Supreme Court has drawn conservatives’ criticism. But they may just have a short memory.

www.nytimes.com

Did You Know Reagan Picked Scalia for the Supreme Court Because He Was Italian?

Nominating Supreme Court justices in part because of background, race, and gender is nothing new.

slate.com

 

[candycorn]

Two different situations, no goalposts needed to be moved.

Biden limits his choices based on (in part) gender, and he's wrong, your cult leader does the same thing and he's right.

Seldom has your cultness been more evident.

 

[martybegan]

Biden limits his choices based on (in part) gender, and he's wrong, your cult leader does the same thing and he's right.

Seldom has your cultness been more evident.

He had already appointed 2 men, and all 3 were on the supposed list of potential justices at the start.

Biden limits his entire search via sex and race.

If you can't see the difference you are either willfully ignorant, or an idiot.

 

[candycorn]

He had already appointed 2 men, and all 3 were on the supposed list of potential justices at the start.

Biden limits his entire search via sex and race.

If you can't see the difference you are either willfully ignorant, or an idiot.

You've taken cult-think to a new level. Congrats dumbledork.

So if Biden appoints a man if he gets a second appointment....that negates the conditions on this pick? If that is your analysis you're either willfully ignorant or an idiot...probably both.

 

[Jim H - VA USA]

Do other leaders of nations use skin color, genitalia and sexual preference as qualifying criteria for their appointments and nominations?
What do ‘independents‘ / fence sitters think of such a methodology?

This US law is over 55 years old. It's the Civil Rights Act of 1964, section VII..

Sec. 703. Discrimination Because of Race, Color, Religion, Sex, or National Origin.​

(a) It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer—

(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or

(2) to limit, segregate, or classify his employees in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

(b) It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employment agency to fail or refuse to refer for employment, or otherwise to discriminate against, any individual because of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, or to classify or refer for employment any individual on the basis of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

Civil Rights Act of 1964/Title VII - Wikisource, the free online library

en.wikisource.org

 

[martybegan]

You've taken cult-think to a new level. Congrats dumbledork.

So if Biden appoints a man if he gets a second appointment....that negates the conditions on this pick? If that is your analysis you're either willfully ignorant or an idiot...probably both.

What cult think? SJW's make everything about the otherness of people, instead of people being people.

Who's tribe is more "oppressed" = who's tribe has more unearned gravitas.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Ask Saint Ronald of Reagan...

Biden is not the first president to promise to select his nominee from a specific demographic group. (Published 2022)

President Biden’s pledge to nominate a Black woman to the Supreme Court has drawn conservatives’ criticism. But they may just have a short memory.

www.nytimes.com

Did You Know Reagan Picked Scalia for the Supreme Court Because He Was Italian?

Nominating Supreme Court justices in part because of background, race, and gender is nothing new.

slate.com

Reagan was a RINO piece of dogshit…..the second worst president of all time.

Who f@cked us over more....Abe or Reagan?

Abe for not sending the slaves back to their homelands or Reagan for opening the flood gates for the modern day slave? More scary taboo...haha

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[candycorn]

What cult think? SJW's make everything about the otherness of people, instead of people being people.

Who's tribe is more "oppressed" = who's tribe has more unearned gravitas.

Hey...just like your cult leader did....

You're lame.

 

[armadei]

Being inclusive just means being inclusive. It has nothing to do with hiring the best people for the job. Let's just all get along and be happy. We don't really need the best person for jobs.

So true! I don't need my pilot to actually be QUALIFIED to fly a 747. I just hope he's a nice guy.

 

[martybegan]

Hey...just like your cult leader did....

You're lame.

What cult?

I always love the cult accusation, Trump just fed into an already angry populace, and his politics (currently) match mine more than any democrat.

Just because lefties love their big brother arch-type, don't try projecting that on the right.

 

[HenryBHough]

He had already appointed 2 men, and all 3 were on the supposed list of potential justices at the start.

Biden limits his entire search via sex and race.

If you can't see the difference you are either willfully ignorant, or an idiot.

You left out anti-Constitutional, anti-America Demmunist. OK, so that would qualify as "stating the obvious" but I really don't think that level of extreme kindness is warranted.

 

[candycorn]

What cult?

I always love the cult accusation, Trump just fed into an already angry populace, and his politics (currently) match mine more than any democrat.

Yeah...okay...more bullshit.

Trump said he'd only consider women for a job. Exactly what Biden did. Your justification that he hired men the first two times makes discrimination okay in the 3rd instance?

Just because lefties love their big brother arch-type, don't try projecting that on the right.

Meanwhile back in reality...conservatives gave us the patriot act. Remember that? Of course you don't. How about the new Texas abortion law that makes it just peachy to sue people who give a woman a ride to the doctor's office?

You love you some jackbooted thugs.

Really pal, you're completely full of shit.

 

[martybegan]

You left out anti-Constitutional, anti-America Demmunist. OK, so that would qualify as "stating the obvious" but I really don't think that level of extreme kindness is warranted.

It's more just pandering combined with the lefts obsession with race/gender/sexuality etc.