Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, he paid and settled. That was obviously civil court, so there is no crime. Have a nice day!
Bu there was a crime. It was called fraud. And he was going to be found guilty of fraud so he settled out of court.
You can't settle criminal acts "out if court"! What are you, a 7th grader?
You lack of knowledge on this topic is only exceeded by every other topic. You don't have a clue!
Let's stay on topic here pal.
If you break the law, you are a criminal. Fraud is a crime. Trump committed fraud.
You need to educate yourself on the difference in civil lawsuits and criminal charges. There is a YUGE difference!
No, I'm just fine. A crime is a crime.
Bu there was a crime. It was called fraud. And he was going to be found guilty of fraud so he settled out of court.
You can't settle criminal acts "out if court"! What are you, a 7th grader?
You lack of knowledge on this topic is only exceeded by every other topic. You don't have a clue!
Let's stay on topic here pal.
If you break the law, you are a criminal. Fraud is a crime. Trump committed fraud.
You need to educate yourself on the difference in civil lawsuits and criminal charges. There is a YUGE difference!
No, I'm just fine. A crime is a crime.
No, you are an ignorant shill.
You can't settle criminal acts "out if court"! What are you, a 7th grader?
You lack of knowledge on this topic is only exceeded by every other topic. You don't have a clue!
Let's stay on topic here pal.
If you break the law, you are a criminal. Fraud is a crime. Trump committed fraud.
You need to educate yourself on the difference in civil lawsuits and criminal charges. There is a YUGE difference!
No, I'm just fine. A crime is a crime.
No, you are an ignorant shill.
Nah.
Let's stay on topic here pal.
If you break the law, you are a criminal. Fraud is a crime. Trump committed fraud.
You need to educate yourself on the difference in civil lawsuits and criminal charges. There is a YUGE difference!
No, I'm just fine. A crime is a crime.
No, you are an ignorant shill.
Nah.
If you are not, why can't you prove me wrong on anything I have stated. If you are not ignorant, then you are just a contrarian who likes to argue even though you know you are wrong.
About 80% of Americans think Congress needs term limits. About the same number also thinks the US federal Congress needs a balanced budget amendment of some kind.
The only way to get either is through the Article V movement.
I believe there's also a popular surge toward reigning in the judiciary.
....so who is going to attend this Article V movement and who picks the agenda?About 80% of Americans think Congress needs term limits. About the same number also thinks the US federal Congress needs a balanced budget amendment of some kind.
The only way to get either is through the Article V movement.
Let me just state this bluntly. No it is not time for an article 5 convention of the states.
Let me just state this bluntly. No it is not time for an article 5 convention of the states.
Is that why about 12 states have already passed it?
Nervous?
Let me just state this bluntly. No it is not time for an article 5 convention of the states.
Is that why about 12 states have already passed it?
Nervous?
Not really.
You need to educate yourself on the difference in civil lawsuits and criminal charges. There is a YUGE difference!
No, I'm just fine. A crime is a crime.
No, you are an ignorant shill.
Nah.
If you are not, why can't you prove me wrong on anything I have stated. If you are not ignorant, then you are just a contrarian who likes to argue even though you know you are wrong.
I have proven you wrong consistently.
Sorry, dude, but that's putting the cart before the horse. The state legislatures have to not only be picked first, but 2/3s of them have to agree on the proposed Amendments. Then that Amendment(s) needs to be ratified by 3/4s of those same state legislatures. In a nation divided roughly 50/50, IMHO, I do not see this going anywhere.That is up to those at the Convention........so who is going to attend this Article V movement and who picks the agenda?
Sorry, dude, but that's putting the cart before the horse. The state legislatures have to not only be picked first, but 2/3s of them have to agree on the proposed Amendments. Then that Amendment(s) needs to be ratified by 3/4s of those same state legislatures. In a nation divided roughly 50/50, IMHO, I do not see this going anywhere.That is up to those at the Convention........so who is going to attend this Article V movement and who picks the agenda?
Article VThe Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress; provided that no amendment which may be made prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any manner affect the first and fourth clauses in the ninth section of the first article; and that no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate.
Agreed. And 92% of Republicans favor background checks for all gun buyers. So why don't we have such "common sense" gun laws? Becauses when the laws are actually written, reality sets in.As I've said before, about 80% of Americans favor such things as term limits for Congress and a balanced budget of some sort.
Do you believe in democracy or don't you? None of these two agendas will go anywhere without the Article V movement. It is either support the movement or watch democracy continue to get crushed.
Congress once cited corruption as the reason for limiting terms for the President. How are they any better? It is truly laughable.
Again you lead with ad hominems. Sad.Only according to Russian fake news, dupe. Believed by Comey. NOT reported by Fox, dupe.
Correct.Perhaps the reason "corrupt, sane competence" lost was because of the much higher level of corruptness.I agree that we were only able to choose between two corrupt evils, however, our two choices actually can be summarized as...Agreed, but Hillary was unfit due to her corruption, cronyism and crooked conduct. "We, the People" had to choose between two deplorable candidates and the lesser of two evils won the election.The fellow is, quite simply, unfit for public office of any kind, never mind the highest office in the land.
1. corrupt, sane competence
2. corrupt, disturbed incompetence
And, unfortunately, "corrupt, sane competence" lost.
What happened to "honest, sane, competent"? Why was the highest office of the land boiled down to two candidates which you admit were both corrupt?
"sane competence" lost? LMAO Comey said the bitch was incompetent. Not sophisticated enough to realize what classified information was, and no reasonable person would have the conversations on an insecure system she did. That reeks of complete incompetence.
.
Correct.Perhaps the reason "corrupt, sane competence" lost was because of the much higher level of corruptness.I agree that we were only able to choose between two corrupt evils, however, our two choices actually can be summarized as...Agreed, but Hillary was unfit due to her corruption, cronyism and crooked conduct. "We, the People" had to choose between two deplorable candidates and the lesser of two evils won the election.The fellow is, quite simply, unfit for public office of any kind, never mind the highest office in the land.
1. corrupt, sane competence
2. corrupt, disturbed incompetence
And, unfortunately, "corrupt, sane competence" lost.
What happened to "honest, sane, competent"? Why was the highest office of the land boiled down to two candidates which you admit were both corrupt?
"sane competence" lost? LMAO Comey said the bitch was incompetent. Not sophisticated enough to realize what classified information was, and no reasonable person would have the conversations on an insecure system she did. That reeks of complete incompetence.
.
Corrupt, sane competence lost.
She knew what she was doing.
She lied her ass off.
That's the "corrupt" part.
However, she also had considerable experience as a First Lady, US Senator and Secretary of State (3rd in LIne of Succession).
As opposed to the Orange Orangutan, who, in a political context, couldn't find his ass with both hands in a well-lit room surrounded by mirrors.
Better a nasty liar like her, who could have gotten things done, rather than a nasty liar like him, who can't get $hit done.
Agreed.Correct.Perhaps the reason "corrupt, sane competence" lost was because of the much higher level of corruptness.I agree that we were only able to choose between two corrupt evils, however, our two choices actually can be summarized as...Agreed, but Hillary was unfit due to her corruption, cronyism and crooked conduct. "We, the People" had to choose between two deplorable candidates and the lesser of two evils won the election.
1. corrupt, sane competence
2. corrupt, disturbed incompetence
And, unfortunately, "corrupt, sane competence" lost.
What happened to "honest, sane, competent"? Why was the highest office of the land boiled down to two candidates which you admit were both corrupt?
"sane competence" lost? LMAO Comey said the bitch was incompetent. Not sophisticated enough to realize what classified information was, and no reasonable person would have the conversations on an insecure system she did. That reeks of complete incompetence.
.
Corrupt, sane competence lost.
She knew what she was doing.
She lied her ass off.
That's the "corrupt" part.
However, she also had considerable experience as a First Lady, US Senator and Secretary of State (3rd in LIne of Succession).
As opposed to the Orange Orangutan, who, in a political context, couldn't find his ass with both hands in a well-lit room surrounded by mirrors.
Better a nasty liar like her, who could have gotten things done, rather than a nasty liar like him, who can't get $hit done.
If she knew what she was doing she belongs in jail, not the WH. She was either too incompetent to be charged or just a felon, you can't have it both ways.
.
Agreed.Correct.Perhaps the reason "corrupt, sane competence" lost was because of the much higher level of corruptness.I agree that we were only able to choose between two corrupt evils, however, our two choices actually can be summarized as...
1. corrupt, sane competence
2. corrupt, disturbed incompetence
And, unfortunately, "corrupt, sane competence" lost.
What happened to "honest, sane, competent"? Why was the highest office of the land boiled down to two candidates which you admit were both corrupt?
"sane competence" lost? LMAO Comey said the bitch was incompetent. Not sophisticated enough to realize what classified information was, and no reasonable person would have the conversations on an insecure system she did. That reeks of complete incompetence.
.
Corrupt, sane competence lost.
She knew what she was doing.
She lied her ass off.
That's the "corrupt" part.
However, she also had considerable experience as a First Lady, US Senator and Secretary of State (3rd in LIne of Succession).
As opposed to the Orange Orangutan, who, in a political context, couldn't find his ass with both hands in a well-lit room surrounded by mirrors.
Better a nasty liar like her, who could have gotten things done, rather than a nasty liar like him, who can't get $hit done.
If she knew what she was doing she belongs in jail, not the WH. She was either too incompetent to be charged or just a felon, you can't have it both ways.
.
She belongs in jail.
However, I would rather have a liar in charge who knows what she's doing, rather than a liar in charge who is frigging clueless in a political and diplomatic context.
They are not equal liars; Hillary is corrupt while Trump is more of a showman/bullshitter. Yes, he out of his depth but Hillary would further use the bureacratic machine for her own ends further corrupting our government. Trump is his own worst enemy and have effectively neutralized himself as President. At worst, nothing will be done under his administration. Under Hillary the power of the Clinton political machine would have been enhanced and we'd be under a far stronger threat of authoritarian rule than anything Trump can do.Agreed.Correct.Perhaps the reason "corrupt, sane competence" lost was because of the much higher level of corruptness.I agree that we were only able to choose between two corrupt evils, however, our two choices actually can be summarized as...
1. corrupt, sane competence
2. corrupt, disturbed incompetence
And, unfortunately, "corrupt, sane competence" lost.
What happened to "honest, sane, competent"? Why was the highest office of the land boiled down to two candidates which you admit were both corrupt?
"sane competence" lost? LMAO Comey said the bitch was incompetent. Not sophisticated enough to realize what classified information was, and no reasonable person would have the conversations on an insecure system she did. That reeks of complete incompetence.
.
Corrupt, sane competence lost.
She knew what she was doing.
She lied her ass off.
That's the "corrupt" part.
However, she also had considerable experience as a First Lady, US Senator and Secretary of State (3rd in LIne of Succession).
As opposed to the Orange Orangutan, who, in a political context, couldn't find his ass with both hands in a well-lit room surrounded by mirrors.
Better a nasty liar like her, who could have gotten things done, rather than a nasty liar like him, who can't get $hit done.
If she knew what she was doing she belongs in jail, not the WH. She was either too incompetent to be charged or just a felon, you can't have it both ways.
.
She belongs in jail.
However, I would rather have a liar in charge who knows what she's doing, rather than a liar in charge who is frigging clueless in a political and diplomatic context.