Is it ethical for the Democratic party to keep blacks on the plantation needing government handouts

[ding]

Full employment of resources benefits the most People in our Republic.

Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is more cost effective than our current and more expensive regime. We should be improving the efficiency of our Government, to lower the cost.

It does provide for the general welfare not the general warfare.

I am glad to see you finally agree with me.

 

[danielpalos]

And I am trying to establish what you think that standard is. What standard are you measuring it against?

Because capitalism has proven to lift people out of poverty. No other form has done so. Even the socialist states that were lifted out of poverty were lifted out through capitalism.

So your argument does not hold any water.

1. No other form of commerce has performed better.
2. Your standard for poverty is skewed to that of a capitalist nation and not the rest of the world.

Full employment of capital resources is the Objective. Compensating Labor for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is a market friendly manner to achieve that End. What benefit does the inefficiency of capitalism's natural rate of unemployment provide for our republic or Labor, specifically?

Capital must circulate under capitalism to ensure liquidity in our market based system of Commerce.

Our economy benefits through greater participation in our markets, and provides an automatic stabilization effect, along with engendering a positive multiplier effect upon our economy

Where does it say that the "Full employment of capital resources is the Objective?"

Besides capitalism employs the greatest employment of capital resources than any other form of commerce and does so without government involvement. So our government is meeting its contract to provide for the general welfare of the public.

Compensating Labor for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is not a market friendly manner and will only result in more inefficiency.

What benefit does the inefficiency of capitalism's natural rate of unemployment provide for our republic or Labor, specifically? First of all capitalism is the most efficient form of commerce so I don't know what inefficiency you are referring to. There is no other form of commerce that is more efficient. Secondly, it is not our government's job or role to do so. Like I said before, no other form of commerce has performed better and your standard for poverty is skewed to that of a capitalist nation and not the rest of the world.

Yes, capital must circulate under capitalism to ensure liquidity in our market based system of Commerce, and does so just fine as long as the government does not interfere.

Full employment of resources benefits the most People in our Republic.

Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is more cost effective than our current and more expensive regime. We should be improving the efficiency of our Government, to lower the cost.

It does provide for the general welfare not the general warfare.

I am glad to see you finally agree with me.

why "punish" the Poor with capitalism's natural rate of unemployment, when we have a fine and wonderful, first world solution for modern economic times?

 

[ding]

And I am trying to establish what you think that standard is. What standard are you measuring it against?

Because capitalism has proven to lift people out of poverty. No other form has done so. Even the socialist states that were lifted out of poverty were lifted out through capitalism.

So your argument does not hold any water.

1. No other form of commerce has performed better.
2. Your standard for poverty is skewed to that of a capitalist nation and not the rest of the world.

Full employment of capital resources is the Objective. Compensating Labor for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is a market friendly manner to achieve that End. What benefit does the inefficiency of capitalism's natural rate of unemployment provide for our republic or Labor, specifically?

Capital must circulate under capitalism to ensure liquidity in our market based system of Commerce.

Our economy benefits through greater participation in our markets, and provides an automatic stabilization effect, along with engendering a positive multiplier effect upon our economy

Where does it say that the "Full employment of capital resources is the Objective?"

Besides capitalism employs the greatest employment of capital resources than any other form of commerce and does so without government involvement. So our government is meeting its contract to provide for the general welfare of the public.

Compensating Labor for Capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is not a market friendly manner and will only result in more inefficiency.

What benefit does the inefficiency of capitalism's natural rate of unemployment provide for our republic or Labor, specifically? First of all capitalism is the most efficient form of commerce so I don't know what inefficiency you are referring to. There is no other form of commerce that is more efficient. Secondly, it is not our government's job or role to do so. Like I said before, no other form of commerce has performed better and your standard for poverty is skewed to that of a capitalist nation and not the rest of the world.

Yes, capital must circulate under capitalism to ensure liquidity in our market based system of Commerce, and does so just fine as long as the government does not interfere.

Full employment of resources benefits the most People in our Republic.

Compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment is more cost effective than our current and more expensive regime. We should be improving the efficiency of our Government, to lower the cost.

It does provide for the general welfare not the general warfare.

I am glad to see you finally agree with me.

why "punish" the Poor with capitalism's natural rate of unemployment, when we have a fine and wonderful, first world solution for modern economic times?

Exactly, and we aren't. I am happy you agree with me again.

 

[danielpalos]

A fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed to help the Poor, pay more in taxes and create more in demand and engender a positive multiplier effect upon our economy.

 

[ding]

A fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed to help the Poor, pay more in taxes and create more in demand and engender a positive multiplier effect upon our economy.

Is that in the constitution?

 

[ding]

Can someone please explain to me how it is ethical for the Democratic Party to refuse to apologize to the black community for their part in perpetuating slavery, segregation and racism?

 

[danielpalos]

A fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed to help the Poor, pay more in taxes and create more in demand and engender a positive multiplier effect upon our economy.

Is that in the constitution?

The power to provide for the general welfare is general. We have a Commerce Clause.

 

[danielpalos]

Can someone please explain to me how it is ethical for the Democratic Party to refuse to apologize to the black community for their part in perpetuating slavery, segregation and racism?

How are they doing that?

 

[ding]

Can someone please explain to me how it is ethical for the Democratic Party to refuse to apologize to the black community for their part in perpetuating slavery, segregation and racism?

How are they doing that?

They aren't doing that, that's how.

They refuse to do it. Would you like to apologize to the black people on their behalf?

 

[ding]

A fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed to help the Poor, pay more in taxes and create more in demand and engender a positive multiplier effect upon our economy.

Is that in the constitution?

The power to provide for the general welfare is general. We have a Commerce Clause.

So you are saying the 15 buck an hour minimum wage isn't in the constitution?

 

[danielpalos]

Can someone please explain to me how it is ethical for the Democratic Party to refuse to apologize to the black community for their part in perpetuating slavery, segregation and racism?

How are they doing that?

They aren't doing that, that's how.

They refuse to do it. Would you like to apologize to the black people on their behalf?

they aren't doing it now; the republicans are worse.

 

[danielpalos]

A fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed to help the Poor, pay more in taxes and create more in demand and engender a positive multiplier effect upon our economy.

Is that in the constitution?

The power to provide for the general welfare is general. We have a Commerce Clause.

So you are saying the 15 buck an hour minimum wage isn't in the constitution?

there is no specific general warfare clause or common offense clause, if that is how specific you want to get.

 

[ding]

Can someone please explain to me how it is ethical for the Democratic Party to refuse to apologize to the black community for their part in perpetuating slavery, segregation and racism?

How are they doing that?

They aren't doing that, that's how.

They refuse to do it. Would you like to apologize to the black people on their behalf?

they aren't doing it now; the republicans are worse.

Would you like to apologize on the behalf of the Democratic Party which oppressed and enslaved black people for 130 years?

 

[ding]

A fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed to help the Poor, pay more in taxes and create more in demand and engender a positive multiplier effect upon our economy.

Is that in the constitution?

The power to provide for the general welfare is general. We have a Commerce Clause.

So you are saying the 15 buck an hour minimum wage isn't in the constitution?

there is no specific general warfare clause or common offense clause, if that is how specific you want to get.

So you are saying the 15 buck an hour minimum wage isn't in the constitution, right?

Say it with me, brother.

the 15 buck an hour minimum wage isn't in the constitution

 

[danielpalos]

A fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed to help the Poor, pay more in taxes and create more in demand and engender a positive multiplier effect upon our economy.

Is that in the constitution?

The power to provide for the general welfare is general. We have a Commerce Clause.

So you are saying the 15 buck an hour minimum wage isn't in the constitution?

there is no specific general warfare clause or common offense clause, if that is how specific you want to get.

So you are saying the 15 buck an hour minimum wage isn't in the constitution, right?

Say it with me, brother.

the 15 buck an hour minimum wage isn't in the constitution

neither are crime, drugs, or terror wars.

 

[ding]

Is that in the constitution?

The power to provide for the general welfare is general. We have a Commerce Clause.

So you are saying the 15 buck an hour minimum wage isn't in the constitution?

there is no specific general warfare clause or common offense clause, if that is how specific you want to get.

So you are saying the 15 buck an hour minimum wage isn't in the constitution, right?

Say it with me, brother.

the 15 buck an hour minimum wage isn't in the constitution

neither are crime, drugs, or terror wars.

Correct. So what?

Say it with me, brother.

the 15 buck an hour minimum wage isn't in the constitution

 

[danielpalos]

The power to provide for the general welfare is general. We have a Commerce Clause.

So you are saying the 15 buck an hour minimum wage isn't in the constitution?

there is no specific general warfare clause or common offense clause, if that is how specific you want to get.

So you are saying the 15 buck an hour minimum wage isn't in the constitution, right?

Say it with me, brother.

the 15 buck an hour minimum wage isn't in the constitution

neither are crime, drugs, or terror wars.

Correct. So what?

Say it with me, brother.

the 15 buck an hour minimum wage isn't in the constitution

Providing for the general welfare is. And, we have a Commerce Clause .

And, not Only that,

our legislators are delegated the power to fix Standards for the States or the Union.

 

[ding]

So you are saying the 15 buck an hour minimum wage isn't in the constitution?

there is no specific general warfare clause or common offense clause, if that is how specific you want to get.

So you are saying the 15 buck an hour minimum wage isn't in the constitution, right?

Say it with me, brother.

the 15 buck an hour minimum wage isn't in the constitution

neither are crime, drugs, or terror wars.

Correct. So what?

Say it with me, brother.

the 15 buck an hour minimum wage isn't in the constitution

Providing for the general welfare is. And, we have a Commerce Clause .

And, not Only that,

our legislators are delegated the power to fix Standards for the States or the Union.

We've already covered that. You lost.

 

[ding]

Say it with me, brother.

the 15 buck an hour minimum wage isn't in the constitution

 

[danielpalos]

there is no specific general warfare clause or common offense clause, if that is how specific you want to get.

So you are saying the 15 buck an hour minimum wage isn't in the constitution, right?

Say it with me, brother.

the 15 buck an hour minimum wage isn't in the constitution

neither are crime, drugs, or terror wars.

Correct. So what?

Say it with me, brother.

the 15 buck an hour minimum wage isn't in the constitution

Providing for the general welfare is. And, we have a Commerce Clause .

And, not Only that,

our legislators are delegated the power to fix Standards for the States or the Union.

We've already covered that. You lost.

that only happens in right wing fantasy; you lost.

our welfare general clause must also be able to promote the welfare, general.