Is Israel held to different or higher standards?

If Israel was held to different standards, the rest of the world probably would have done something to stop their settlements by now and taken control of Gaza and the West Bank away from them.





AND BE IN BREACH OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE PROCESS

Or is this another example of how Jew haters hold Israel to a different standard. Do explain how imposing border controls and missile defences is controlling gaza. There is no international law that says Israel has to allow any goods to or from gaza to cross its air, land or sea. There is no International law that says Israel is not allowed to defend itself from terrorism and military action, as much as you would like to see such a law passed. Always remember that the problems started when the arab muslims refused to give up 1% of the land they had stolen from he Jews that lived there for 4,500 years. And when they found that they could no longer intimidate women and children they resorted to all out violence. Time for the UN to impose its charter on the arab muslims and use force of arms to put down the terrorism and violence.
Your comment about 4,500 years and arabs being asked to give up 1% of their land is laughable. Next you'll be saying it's God's will that Israel belongs to the Jews and that trumps any international law you seem to care so much about, which Israel btw doesn't.






When did it become arab land then, give the date in the last 1000 years when arabs had sovereignty over the land in question.
No I always stand on the shoulders of international law in regards to the rights of Israel to claim the land given to them under international law in 1923. I leave the cheap shots to the idiots that defend and support islamonazi terrorism, rape, murder and theft, as that is all they have to oppose international law and historical evidence.


By the way the arabs held sovereignty over the land for 22 years which ended when the Crusaders beat the crap out of them and then kicked them out of Jerusalem.
 
theliq, ogibillm, et al,

This doesn't make any sense.

But they certainly don't intentionally target innocent civilians; not on the order the Palestinians have.
and yet they've killed far more civilians than the Palestinians
YOU MEAN PALESTINIAN CIVILIANS ...get it right
(COMMENT)

There is a difference between the intentional targeting of civilians as targets (a practice of HAMAS) 'vs' and the inadvertent deaths of civilians during a tactical engagement where HAMAS purposely chose a "densely populated area to fight from or the purposely chose not to remove civilians from a potential battlefield.

Most Respectfully,
R
you cannot claim that cibilian deaths on the scale perpetrated by israel are "inadvertent"

at best you can say that israel.finds the collateral deaths acceptable
 
If Israel was held to different standards, the rest of the world probably would have done something to stop their settlements by now and taken control of Gaza and the West Bank away from them.





AND BE IN BREACH OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE PROCESS

Or is this another example of how Jew haters hold Israel to a different standard. Do explain how imposing border controls and missile defences is controlling gaza. There is no international law that says Israel has to allow any goods to or from gaza to cross its air, land or sea. There is no International law that says Israel is not allowed to defend itself from terrorism and military action, as much as you would like to see such a law passed. Always remember that the problems started when the arab muslims refused to give up 1% of the land they had stolen from he Jews that lived there for 4,500 years. And when they found that they could no longer intimidate women and children they resorted to all out violence. Time for the UN to impose its charter on the arab muslims and use force of arms to put down the terrorism and violence.
Your comment about 4,500 years and arabs being asked to give up 1% of their land is laughable. Next you'll be saying it's God's will that Israel belongs to the Jews and that trumps any international law you seem to care so much about, which Israel btw doesn't.

Why is giving up 1% (actually even less than that) so laughable? It's not like the Arabs made such a huge success in the other 99% of the Middle East!
Yeah 1%. Except that 1% is literally the hotbed of thousands of years of religious insanity. The most important 1% in that entire desert wasteland.
 
If Israel was held to different standards, the rest of the world probably would have done something to stop their settlements by now and taken control of Gaza and the West Bank away from them.





AND BE IN BREACH OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE PROCESS

Or is this another example of how Jew haters hold Israel to a different standard. Do explain how imposing border controls and missile defences is controlling gaza. There is no international law that says Israel has to allow any goods to or from gaza to cross its air, land or sea. There is no International law that says Israel is not allowed to defend itself from terrorism and military action, as much as you would like to see such a law passed. Always remember that the problems started when the arab muslims refused to give up 1% of the land they had stolen from he Jews that lived there for 4,500 years. And when they found that they could no longer intimidate women and children they resorted to all out violence. Time for the UN to impose its charter on the arab muslims and use force of arms to put down the terrorism and violence.
Your comment about 4,500 years and arabs being asked to give up 1% of their land is laughable. Next you'll be saying it's God's will that Israel belongs to the Jews and that trumps any international law you seem to care so much about, which Israel btw doesn't.






When did it become arab land then, give the date in the last 1000 years when arabs had sovereignty over the land in question.
No I always stand on the shoulders of international law in regards to the rights of Israel to claim the land given to them under international law in 1923. I leave the cheap shots to the idiots that defend and support islamonazi terrorism, rape, murder and theft, as that is all they have to oppose international law and historical evidence.


By the way the arabs held sovereignty over the land for 22 years which ended when the Crusaders beat the crap out of them and then kicked them out of Jerusalem.
Omg, 4500 years ago... the crusaders....

This is why there will never be peace in the "holy land." Because religious whackos will give no quarter. The crusaders, btw, were Christians. How did the Jews wind up with Jerusalem again?
 
Back
Top Bottom