Eric Stratton
Gold Member
- Nov 9, 2020
- 437
- 266
- 158
You can't see well with your head inside your grocery exit.Polls....yeah they were excellent. Those ratings were run low by the biased media. What was his approval rating on the economy? High 50s. Stop your trolling, fat boy. He nearly won again with COVID. Without COVID he definitely wins as there are fewer mail in ballots as well.What? His numbers on how he ran the economy were abysmal? LOLBy cherry picking I mean doing it at a point in time vs. what really happened and what led to those results. No COVID and Trump's numbers are great and he likely wins a 2nd term. Context matters. Any president in his position would look bad as we had to shut down the economy.LOLYou're cherry picking numbers without context.LOLI submit that a fairly large % of those job gains you attribute to him are federal government hirees who produce $0.00 in GDP.
You're wrong about that too. Here are the numbers from the private sector...
Employed (Private Sector)
Clinton ... +20,970,000
Bush ............... -387,000
Obama ... +11,849,000
Trump ......... -2,481,000
Public sector...
Clinton ....... +1,934,000
Bush ............ +1,744,000
Obama ............ -277,000
Trump .............. -773,000
Black males make up 6% of the US population. NBA is 85% black. So is the NBA racist?
By "cherry-picking," you mean posting the actual numbers for the entirety of each respective presidency.
Trump's pre-covid numbers were abysmal. They actually went up with COVID....and then back down when his incompetence really began to shine.
If Trump hadn't suppressed his own votes by shitting on mail in ballots and hadn't been so wildly incompetent in his response to COVID, he may have won.
Alas, he did. And he was.
I am tired of your one way conspiracy theory diatribe. Troll someone else, fat boy.
His approval ratings before the Marchi 16th lockdowns marked the nation taking COVID very seriously were absymal. Just before the lock down his job approval ratings were hovering around 42%.
No president has ever been relected with numbers that low.
You're the one citing 'his numbers'. And when 'his numbers' don't support your narrative, you attack the validity of 'his numbers'.
If you're gonna wipe your ass with your own argument, just give me a head's up in advance. It will save us both time.