mdk
Diamond Member
- Sep 6, 2014
- 40,558
- 14,037
- 2,630
Meaning giving them special exemption from laws based on sexual predilection. But that's not the real issue. The real issue is the usurpation of states rights to make laws. Whether a state had homosexual marriage or not should have been up to each state not five old people in a robe. But like I said the progressives bought the homosexual male vote for a short period of time. Because homosexual or not they are still men and feminism thus progressivism see them are war mongering rapists.This topic is old and over. The progressives twisted the constitution to grant homosexuals extra rights. Now they will get thier votes.
'Extra rights' meaning of course- treating them the same before the law.
Something Conservatives despise.
Sent from my SM-G386T1 using Tapatalk
Special exemption/extra rights my foot. You're free to enter in a gay marriage if you so wish. Whether you want to or not is an entirely different fox hunt.
No, states don't get to violate the 14th Amendment anymore than they get to violate the 2nd Amendment. When they do so citizens have every right to seek redress in the courts. Either way, gay marriage is the law of the land.