Oh, then you said that black kids need to be bussed to school in white areas because black people are net takers of the tax system and contribute nothing to their own schools (Despite the fact that intercity schools have more funding per pupil than any white district I am aware of)?
Nope. One more try? Please remember that I began your lesson with a question about how public schools are funded. I know you can do it!
You allowed a link to do your arguing for you. What is your claim?
Clearly......my claim is that institutionalized and legal segregation.....based on economic factors.....such as low levels of property tax revenue....which has impacted minorities to a greater degree than it has impacted white people....when coupled with the school to prison pipeline....is DIRECTLY responsible for the "thug" culture that you are so interested in discussing.
Get it, professor?
I love the low property tax revenue portion. If only the government would take more money from home owners, Death Row Records would never have gained so much traction back in the early '90's.
Essentially, in order for this argument to make sense, you'd have to find consistency in other cultures that exist(ed) largely in poverty in our country.
Virtually every ethnic migration that happened prior to the turn of the 20'th century was met with open, mainstream hostility, and immigrant communities were largely segregated and impoverished during the first generation of their arrival. So, if the cause is simply that the government didn't redistribute enough wealth, why didn't -all- immigrant communities evolve with the same per capita violent crime rate as what currently exists in impoverished black communities?
IF you ask me, the difference is not only not primarily economic, but almost -purely- cultural. Modern mainstream culture doesn't condone random violence from Irish people, despite the "Irish need not apply" epidemic that once existed. It doesn't condone random violence from Chinese immigrants (or wouldn't, if we even witnessed much of it). It doesn't condone rampant criminality from the descendants of Italian immigrants. Granted, with all three of these ethnicities, there are counter-culture forces that glorify gang violence and criminality, but they aren't endorsed by the mainstream. At no point did any law abiding, sane people harbor ideals that John Gotti was morally justified in his criminal activities. Only counter-culture voices (mostly rappers lol) glorified John Gotti. In the other two examples, Irish and Chinese culture, the counter-culture glorification of criminality largely revolves around images and terminology made popular by, you guessed it, rap music, and thus can't be held completely separate from African American counter-culture.
Now, stay with me, I'm not saying one counter-culture is to blame over the others. The problem is when our mainstream culture morally condones the criminality pushed by those counter-culture voices. Only with African Americans do you really see this happening. Guilty white liberals and black apologists wag fingers in the faces of the judgemental and tell us to temper our outrage regarding black criminals, in particular, because of the economic factors and historical and perceived white oppression that factor into the criminal's current circumstance, which is apparently to blame for their actions. You can see it in mainstream news. White people at a tea party rally accused of spitting at a black politician? Universally inexcusable, regardless of how they feel about taxation or their perception of government oppression. Black people committing acts of random violence against parties not responsible in response to their perception of systemic racism being the cause of individual police officers abusing their power? Not only is there news article after news article condoning it, but they go a step further and inform you that you're racially insensitive for thinking there's something wrong with rioting when African Americans are largely the ones doing the looting, because this is the only way they feel like they'll be heard. The Free Mumia movement is actually politically acceptable, even though the guy made his political statement by murdering a random white police officer who wasn't personally responsible for anything the guy was rallying against. I've yet to hear of a single school teacher or college professor involved with a Free Gotti campaign.
ONLY with African Americans does our mainstream News Media condone random criminality. ONLY with African Americans do our educators push for the philosophical acceptance of random acts of violence. Only with black culture does the mainstream accept and support the glorification of violence and criminality pushed by the counter-culture. While other counter-culture gang images are deemed "cool", but remain morally reprehensible, the same moral tempering is virtually non-existent where the image of black criminality is concerned, and in fact much of the mainstream culture goes so far as to name it morally virtuous (the noble rioter, doing what he must to affect positive change).