Toro
Diamond Member
No.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The New York Times article reads >> "Afghan pullout seen as new threat for U.S." They're talking about the nuclear weapons in the arsenal of Pakistan. And the possibility of some of those going missing, being stolen by Islamist jihadists.
No doubt about the threat. The Muslim crazies in Pakistan have repeatedly attacked the storage facilities of these nukes. . The situation is so bad that Pakistan now moves these warheads around in ordinary cargo vans (like UPS), through ordinary streets, to keep the jihadists from focusing in on their locations. Problem is though, this also makes them dangerously susceptible to attack, if/whenever the gooneybirds manage to find the vans. On top of that, the Pakistani govt. is quite fragile, and if toppled by the Muslim loonies, the nukes would quickly be in the hands of the same people who attacked us on 9/11 and Fort Hood. In Afghanistan, it is essential for US troops to be in close proximity to Pakistan and it's arsenal of 100+ nuclear warheads. With the troops in Afghanistan, they can be close enough to the Paki nukes to quickly get to them, and secure them from the jihadists.
Note: If I had my way, the troops would enter Pakistan now and secure those nukes, and bring them back to the US, or to another safe location far away from al Qaeda's central operations.
Afghan pullout seen as new threat for U.S. | Tampa Bay Times
WikiLeaks cables highlight Pakistani nuclear terror threat | World news | The Guardian
Pakistan: Nuclear Arsenal Will Be Protected By 8,000 Trainees, Military Says
Enough about Iran, Pakistan's nuclear threat should be our top concern | Fox News
'Pakistan nuclear weapons' threat under estimated' | NDTV.com
Why Pakistan's nuclear bombs are a threat | Asia | DW.DE | 09.04.2013
Pakistan trains 8,000 to guard nuclear arsenal ? USATODAY.com
Fear mongering from the perpetual warfare crowd.
The New York Times article reads >> "Afghan pullout seen as new threat for U.S." They're talking about the nuclear weapons in the arsenal of Pakistan. And the possibility of some of those going missing, being stolen by Islamist jihadists.
No doubt about the threat. The Muslim crazies in Pakistan have repeatedly attacked the storage facilities of these nukes. . The situation is so bad that Pakistan now moves these warheads around in ordinary cargo vans (like UPS), through ordinary streets, to keep the jihadists from focusing in on their locations. Problem is though, this also makes them dangerously susceptible to attack, if/whenever the gooneybirds manage to find the vans. On top of that, the Pakistani govt. is quite fragile, and if toppled by the Muslim loonies, the nukes would quickly be in the hands of the same people who attacked us on 9/11 and Fort Hood. In Afghanistan, it is essential for US troops to be in close proximity to Pakistan and it's arsenal of 100+ nuclear warheads. With the troops in Afghanistan, they can be close enough to the Paki nukes to quickly get to them, and secure them from the jihadists.
Note: If I had my way, the troops would enter Pakistan now and secure those nukes, and bring them back to the US, or to another safe location far away from al Qaeda's central operations.
Afghan pullout seen as new threat for U.S. | Tampa Bay Times
WikiLeaks cables highlight Pakistani nuclear terror threat | World news | The Guardian
Pakistan: Nuclear Arsenal Will Be Protected By 8,000 Trainees, Military Says
Enough about Iran, Pakistan's nuclear threat should be our top concern | Fox News
'Pakistan nuclear weapons' threat under estimated' | NDTV.com
Why Pakistan's nuclear bombs are a threat | Asia | DW.DE | 09.04.2013
Pakistan trains 8,000 to guard nuclear arsenal ? USATODAY.com
Fear mongering from the perpetual warfare crowd.
They wont be happy until we have a presence in every country and people not afriad to die blowing up our cities back here in the US. How intelligent do you have to be before you realize this war thing creates terrorism.
Earth to Protectionist. Christian terrorism has overrun the world. I dont get your point?
Earth to Protectionist. Christian terrorism has overrun the world. I dont get your point?
Oh please. I think something weird has overrun your mind. You know how many times of heard that piece of NONSENSE ? There is no such thing as Christian terrorism, and if you can cite some to me, let's her it.
Pope Nicholas V issued the papal bull Dum Diversas on 18 June, 1452. It authorised Alfonso V of Portugal to reduce any Saracens (Muslims) and pagans and any other unbelievers to perpetual slavery.
Earth to Protectionist. Christian terrorism has overrun the world. I dont get your point?
Oh please. I think something weird has overrun your mind. You know how many times of heard that piece of NONSENSE ? There is no such thing as Christian terrorism, and if you can cite some to me, let's her it.
Where should I start? Lets see how about the papal bull to set up historical context?
Untitled Document
Pope Nicholas V issued the papal bull Dum Diversas on 18 June, 1452. It authorised Alfonso V of Portugal to reduce any “Saracens (Muslims) and pagans and any other unbelievers” to perpetual slavery.
Using this doctrine Columbus wiped out the Arawak Indians in the Bahamas. Should I go on or do you get the picture sufficiently enough to realize how stupid you sound?