Zone1 Is Abortion Murder?

ChristisKing

Merry Christmas!! 😁
Joined
Jun 16, 2021
Messages
46,464
Reaction score
41,561
Points
3,488
Location
USA
I don't get the Liberals. One minute they're saying that abortion is all about women's rights and the next minute it's about the right to murder your baby. So which is it?
 
depends

if you consider a fetus a possible viable human being

it's murder.

if you consider a fetus nothing more than a cancerous group of cells, or a tumor...


it needs to be destroyed.
 
I don't get the Liberals. One minute they're saying that abortion is all about women's rights and the next minute it's about the right to murder your baby. So which is it?

It is all about women's rights so long as the infant wasn't a woman.
Abortion is really about the right of people to sleep around with no concern for life, no concern for responsibility, no concern for contraception, so long as they can go to a taxpayer-financed clinic and just pop the baby out and go right on sleeping around.
 
depends

if you consider a fetus a possible viable human being

it's murder.

if you consider a fetus nothing more than a cancerous group of cells, or a tumor...


it needs to be destroyed.


Legally that's true too.
 
I reckon it is. The "clump of cells" while unable to live outside the mother independently, will not develop into an elephant, or a tree, or a fish. Furthermore, physiologically, that baby is no different at the moment it leaves the womb than it was a few seconds prior. Thus, we can reason that the baby, prior to exiting the womb, is also a human. We all accept that it's a human once it comes out, and it's the same baby a few seconds before it comes out, so clearly it being inside or outside isn't really a factor.

Having said that, I still think abortions should be reserved for cases of rape, defect, and of course the mothers life being in danger. Perhaps also cases where the child is a product of adultery.
 
I reckon it is. The "clump of cells" while unable to live outside the mother independently, will not develop into an elephant, or a tree, or a fish. Furthermore, physiologically, that baby is no different at the moment it leaves the womb than it was a few seconds prior. Thus, we can reason that the baby, prior to exiting the womb, is also a human. We all accept that it's a human once it comes out, and it's the same baby a few seconds before it comes out, so clearly it being inside or outside isn't really a factor.

Having said that, I still think abortions should be reserved for cases of rape, defect, and of course the mothers life being in danger. Perhaps also cases where the child is a product of adultery.


What do you mean by defect?
 
if you consider a fetus a possible viable human being

I was once a fetus...you were once a fetus...everybody alive today was once a fetus.

Doesn't that make "fetus" a stage of development? No different than infant, toddler, adolescent, adult, or elderly?

Why is it OK declare "open season" on one stage of development and not others?
 
I was following you up untill this point. How disgusting! I have disabilities myself. In the words of Stephanie Tanner from Full House,... How rude!! 😡
If it's any consolation, it's nothing personal. Besides, you made it. No point worrying. Not unless the Democrats manage to push through fourth-trimester abortion laws. But I don't see that panning out.
 
If it's any consolation, it's nothing personal. Besides, you made it.


So you're not referring to me just other people with disabilities or in your words defective people like me. You really are despicable and just when I was starting to like you too.
 
I was once a fetus...you were once a fetus...everybody alive today was once a fetus.

Doesn't that make "fetus" a stage of development? No different than infant, toddler, adolescent, adult, or elderly?

Why is it OK declare "open season" on one stage of development and not others?
Yep, you should be able kill anyone up until they are a fully devolved adult at the age of 25 LOL
 
Terminating a life is the killing of a life some could say... Murder however has its own definition that I don't connect with or attribute to abortion...
 
I don't get the Liberals. One minute they're saying that abortion is all about women's rights and the next minute it's about the right to murder your baby. So which is it?
What are you talking about, little Miss Mixed Up Mind.
 
15th post
I don't get the Liberals. One minute they're saying that abortion is all about women's rights and the next minute it's about the right to murder your baby. So which is it?

Fetuses aren't people, so they can't be murdered.

We don't count Fetuses on the Census.
We don't let you count a fetus for a tax deduction.
Even when abortion was illegal, it was never charged as murder.

As a practical matter, making a Fetus a person with more rights than the person it is inside is problematic at best.

Do we now investigate every miscarriage as a homicide?

Do we charge pregnant women with assault if they have a smoke or a sip of wine?
 
I don't get the Liberals. One minute they're saying that abortion is all about women's rights and the next minute it's about the right to murder your baby. So which is it?

It is the willful killing of a unique life, but it isn't murder until the law makes it murder.
 
IF YOU do not like abortion don't have one.
Feel free to express your dislike.
And then WHEN it comes to peoples private & personal life's
mind your own business.
 
I don't get the Liberals. One minute they're saying that abortion is all about women's rights and the next minute it's about the right to murder your baby. So which is it?

sounds like you're talking to different people with different ideas.

so all your friend think the same way about everything? sounds like an ant hill.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom