Irony Alert! Fox News’ Stossel Says “Dumb People” Shouldn’t Vote

[Toddsterpatriot]

Really? Links...

Truly.

Yep....

Maybe you missed it? It was in all the papers.


https://www.google.com/#sclient=psy....,cf.osb&fp=4c3fe1a9859f48e4&biw=1024&bih=560

 

[liason82]

has always been so "mainstream" and "network tv"

 

[NYcarbineer]

Is it a proven scientific fact that there is no such thing as man made global warming?

NO.

Has anyone else noticed that it's the rightwing nuts who want to deprive voters of their rights,

but only in a manner that favors the Right?

Could you idiots be any more transparent?

Is it a proven scientific fact that there is no such thing as man made global warming?

Nor has it been PROVEN to exist either. Causation/Corellation is still yet to be determined, but the amount of fraud used to prove causation has been quite high.

By the standards of proof applied by AGW skeptics, science has never proven anything.

It's mystifying that so many conservatives who will devote their lives to their belief in the Bible will on the other hand demand absolute proof beyond all doubt, reasonable and unreasonable,

for science, or more precisely, science they don't like.

 

[paulitician]

Nor has it been PROVEN to exist either. Causation/Corellation is still yet to be determined, but the amount of fraud used to prove causation has been quite high.

By the standards of proof applied by AGW skeptics, science has never proven anything.

It's mystifying that so many conservatives who will devote their lives to their belief in the Bible will on the other hand demand absolute proof beyond all doubt, reasonable and unreasonable,

for science, or more precisely, science they don't like.

Stossel nailed you. Now can you please stay home in November? Do it for your country.

 

[Big Fitz]

Nor has it been PROVEN to exist either. Causation/Corellation is still yet to be determined, but the amount of fraud used to prove causation has been quite high.

By the standards of proof applied by AGW skeptics, science has never proven anything.

It's mystifying that so many conservatives who will devote their lives to their belief in the Bible will on the other hand demand absolute proof beyond all doubt, reasonable and unreasonable,

for science, or more precisely, science they don't like.

verified and recreated the big bang yet? Or how about the frankenstein-esque spawning of life from soup and lightning? I smell a weeeeeee bit of faith and religion around those bad boys.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Nor has it been PROVEN to exist either. Causation/Corellation is still yet to be determined, but the amount of fraud used to prove causation has been quite high.

By the standards of proof applied by AGW skeptics, science has never proven anything.

It's mystifying that so many conservatives who will devote their lives to their belief in the Bible will on the other hand demand absolute proof beyond all doubt, reasonable and unreasonable,

for science, or more precisely, science they don't like.

Maybe the fact that global warmists want to spend trillions of dollars, to reduce the temperature by 0.2 degrees in 2080, has something to do with our demand for more proof?

 

[rightwinger]

By the standards of proof applied by AGW skeptics, science has never proven anything.

It's mystifying that so many conservatives who will devote their lives to their belief in the Bible will on the other hand demand absolute proof beyond all doubt, reasonable and unreasonable,

for science, or more precisely, science they don't like.

Stossel nailed you. Now can you please stay home in November? Do it for your country.

Sorry buddy

But I doubt if 9-11 truthers qualify on Stossels list as qualified to vote

 

[Truthseeker420]

By the standards of proof applied by AGW skeptics, science has never proven anything.

It's mystifying that so many conservatives who will devote their lives to their belief in the Bible will on the other hand demand absolute proof beyond all doubt, reasonable and unreasonable,

for science, or more precisely, science they don't like.

Maybe the fact that global warmists want to spend trillions of dollars, to reduce the temperature by 0.2 degrees in 2080, has something to do with our demand for more proof?

I wish people had that attitude toward the Iraq War. How many trillions did that waste?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It's mystifying that so many conservatives who will devote their lives to their belief in the Bible will on the other hand demand absolute proof beyond all doubt, reasonable and unreasonable,

for science, or more precisely, science they don't like.

Maybe the fact that global warmists want to spend trillions of dollars, to reduce the temperature by 0.2 degrees in 2080, has something to do with our demand for more proof?

I wish people had that attitude toward the Iraq War. How many trillions did that waste?

You tell me.