So low confidence would be legit based on early intel.
Media went ballistic anyways along with our leftist clowns here.
Iran's Fordow Still Standing. Mission Not Accomplished!
- Thread starter krichton
- Start date
So low confidence would be legit based on early intel.
Media went ballistic anyways along with our leftist clowns here.
Last I heard they collectively shit their pants.
It's naughty to quote me incorrectly!
Yeah, I know the facts come with a sting but whattaya do now?
If the Amerinazi regime gets into helping the Zionists, there'a a renewed threat of China and Russia doing something that would that nuclear war thingy!
We're going to have to consider the options on this clusterfuk that Bibi has got going.
Just a good job that the job on Iran's nukes was successful!
And then Trump said!!
- Moderator
- #244
The leaker took advantage of the public's lack of understanding and made the Administration waste time trying to explain.
Sorry..... wasn't intentional.
They have had their eyes and their posterior orfaces opened.
- Dec 5, 2010
- 114,314
- 46,710
- 2,330
The Aya Toilet is in very poor health says the IRGC.
So...
They will have to take over... with a military leadership.
Iran's next fearless leader will be jackbooting.
Unless Iranians have the say in a Democratic election.
So...
They will have to take over... with a military leadership.
Iran's next fearless leader will be jackbooting.
Unless Iranians have the say in a Democratic election.
HaShev
Platinum Member
- Jun 19, 2009
- 19,205
- 8,623
- 925
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Is that halal?
- Sep 19, 2020
- 8,972
- 10,473
- 2,138
- Thread starter
- #251
Interesting article about Iranian concrete. Iran is the forefront of UHPC concrete. (Ultra High performance concrete)
According to Popular Mechanics, previously , a yield strength of 5,000 pounds per square inch (psi) was enough for concrete to be rated as “high strength,” with the best going up to 10,000 psi. The new UHPC can withstand 40,000 psi or more. The greater strength is achieved by turning concrete into a composite material with the addition of steel or other fibers. These fibers hold the concrete together and prevent cracks from spreading throughout it, negating the brittleness. The problem is that even the biggest bomb possible, made of the toughest material available, may no longer be able to hack it. Gregory Vartanov, Ph.D., of Toronto-based Advanced Materials Development Corp, claims high-grade UHPC is simply too strong for bombs made with existing steels. “Penetrators with monolithic cases made from materials such as … Eglin Steel … cannot penetrate bunkers made from UHPC,” Vartanov notes in a February 2021 piece in Aerospace & Defense Technology magazine, basing his claim on open-source penetration formulas.
So, it may be that Iran was prepared for this attack which may explain why the assessments to the Iranian facility are being downplayed and revised.
You would think US Intelligence would know this.
In a First, America Dropped 30,000-Pound Bunker-Busters—But Iran’s Concrete May Be Unbreakable, Scientists Say
President Trump is claiming the strikes “obliterated” three underground nuclear sites in Iran protected by military grade concrete. The truth may be more complicated.www.popularmechanics.com
Kim Jung Un and Putin are furiously taking notes as we speak.
US intel absolutely does, but when you have a president as petulant as Trump, order a strike, who is going to say, "hold on, sir, I don't think that would be a good idea."
- Thread starter
- #252
I trust foxnews. They would never ever lie about anything concerning Trump.
- Thread starter
- #253
Was it out of the dem playbook for Trump to rip up the deal that held back Iran's nuclear program? Hmmm
- Thread starter
- #254
I don't recall American bases or the US being attacked.
LOL......................CNN just got gigged...................you're on record swallowing everything US intel puts out.
Obama got punked.............Iran was cheating the whole time.
Which time?
- Thread starter
- #256
Well if you say it, then it absolutely must be true! There's no way, our intel agencies could possibly know more than you
I posted sourced results...Well if you say it, then it absolutely must be true! There's no way, our intel agencies could possibly know more than you
Suck on that.
- Thread starter
- #259
I posted sourced results...
Suck on that.
No, the only thing you've done is refuse to acknowledge the IAEA's own findings on their website from 2015-2018, instead you've pushed your own narratives to make it sound like Iran has been secretly creating a nuclear weapon from the start when there has been no evidence of this. Major violations of the JCPOA with regards to installing certrifuges, enriching uranium past 3.5%, stockpiling, etc. This only happened late 2018 and into 2019 and beyond. This has all been recorded by the IAEA. Nothing like this had happened before Trump pulled out of the agreement. Suck on that!
toomuchtime_
Gold Member
- Dec 29, 2008
- 22,095
- 6,523
- 280
Iran has been in violation of the NPT for years and began JCPOA in violation of that agreement. Iran had guaranteed its Arak reactor, and heavy water reactor that produces plutonium had been filled with cement so that it could never be used again, but when Israel bombed it, it was in service and producing plutonium. Obama said trust but verify, but he clearly did not verify, and if he had, he would likely have covered up the findings because under JCPOA if Iran denied a violation, it would take a three or four month period of investigation before any action could be taken and then the only action allowed was to end the agreement.
JCPOA was deeply flawed in other very important ways. The inspectors were only allowed to inspect sites Iran had designated as nuclear sites, but Iran had a long history of violating NPT by developing nuclear sites without telling the IAEA about them, Natanz and Arak among them.
Before Obama fumbled his way through negotiations with Iran, the US position had always been exactly what President Trump's position is today, no enrichment. The reason for this was Iran's aggressive behavior in the ME and beyond. In addition to constantly attacking Israel through its Shi'ite proxies and declaring it was on a mission from G-d to destroy Israel, Iran had rendered Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Yemen failed states by subverting their Shi'ite populations to supersede the governments of those states, but Obama declared right from the start of negotiations that he would not take Iran's aggressive behaviors into consideration during negotiations.
Once a country has a large, well established enrichment program it can easily use it to produce fissile material for a bomb, and that is exactly what Iran did when the US withdrew from the deeply flawed JCPOA agreement and this move validates the pre Obama US position of no enrichment for Iran.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
A curious attempt in Israel to snuff out a probe of 10/7
- Started by EMH
- Replies: 0
-
Trump admin invokes Defense Production Act, directs oil company to restart California operations- Started by 1srelluc
- Replies: 5
-
-
-
Southwest Airlines has announced that all flights out of two major travel hubs will be cancelled in June
- Started by 1srelluc
- Replies: 0
