Iran to sign deal

[Bad Bob]

I would love to see TACO take on North-Korea.

The US has never taken on a nuclear wielding country - they ONLY go for military underdogs.

He won't. He and Kim exchange love letters.

 

[kyzr]

Your defense of your Orange Daddy is commendable, kyzr.
Unlike you, your fellow MAGAts and your LWL counterparts, I have higher expectations of our leaders. The whole "with great power comes great responsibility" thing.

LOL. You can type that after 4 years of Joe Biden

 

[Bad Bob]

LOL. You can type that after 4 years of Joe Biden

...and four years of Trump, eight years of Obama, eight years of Bush, eight years of Clinton...yada, yada, yada.

Are you an American?

 

[Kruska]

In short: The 1979 Iran–U.S. “war” was not a direct military conflict, but a prolonged political and diplomatic war fueled by the revolution, the hostage crisis, and mutual distrust that continues to shape U.S.–Iran relations today.

I short: the 1953 CIA-backed coup was the starting point of a 73 years long struggle of the Iranian people against US political interference and domination.

You also forget to mention the Feb, 1979 storming of the US embassy in Tehran that resulted in the taking of 100 US hostages - that was resolved on good will by Khomeini.

 

[White 6]

/——/ “Trump cannot be trusted, either“
The only thing demoCRATs can be trusted to do is stab the president in the back and undermine the USA.

I do not actually know of any Democrats the Trump administration has negotiating with Iran. I think you are lying about Democrats even being involved. It sounds like a MAGA lie to divert the subject, not going they way they want.

 

[Bad Bob]

I short: the 1953 CIA-backed coup was the starting point of a 73 years long struggle of the Iranian people against US political interference and domination.

You also forget to mention the Feb, 1979 storming of the US embassy in Tehran that resulted in the taking of 100 US hostages - that was resolved on good will by Khomeini.

Lots of bad things happened during the Cold War.
The only good thing about the Cold War was that it wasn't a Hot War.

That said, both Russia, China and the US should own up to their actions in those days just like Britain and France have owned up to their actions during the Colonial Era.

 

[skye]

Did Netanyahu approve of this new deal?

Because he is the one running the show here.

If he didn't then there is no deal.

 

[Bad Bob]

Did Netanyahu approve of this new deal?

Because he is the one running the show here.

If he didn't then there is no deal.

Da Joooos!!!! LOL

Disagreed. Trump does whatever he wants....as long as he's properly paid.

What do you think Bibi is paying Trump, skye? What is Saudi Arabia paying him?

 

[Zincwarrior]

No deal. NACHO.

 

[dblack]

What do you think Bibi is paying Trump, skye?

Silence.

 

[Kruska]

Lots of bad things happened during the Cold War.
The only good thing about the Cold War was that it wasn't a Hot War.

That said, both Russia, China and the US should own up to their actions in those days just like Britain and France have owned up to their actions during the Colonial Era.

Britain and France haven't owned up all their actions. Maybe TACO can help his motor-chain-boyfriend in Argentina to rid Britain of the Falklands after all Britain refused to help him on Iran. So the US could take neutral custody of the Falklands.

Hey, I am just trying to get into MAGA's and TACO's mindset. Greenland in the North and Falklands in the South would make sense to them and him. There are a lot off places where he can create havoc and distraction from his failed promises and Epstein.

 

[Cellblock2429]

I do not actually know of any Democrats the Trump administration has negotiating with Iran. I think you are lying about Democrats even being involved. It sounds like a MAGA lie to divert the subject, not going the way they want.

/——/ No one including me ever said democRATs are involved in negotiations. What a screwball thing to suggest.

 

[White 6]

Did Netanyahu approve of this new deal?

Because he is the one running the show here.

If he didn't then there is no deal.

I think Netanyahu was originally running the show, but when it failed to produce the desired result, the Trump administration is now winging it, in damage control, cover mode, hoping to salvage something out of this.

 

[Zincwarrior]

/——/ No one including me ever said democRATs are involved in negotiations. What a screwball thing to suggest.

Evidently Iran isn't either.

 

[skye]

I think Netanyahu was originally running the show, but when it failed to produce the desired result, the Trump administration is now winging it, in damage control, cover mode, hoping to salvage something out of this.

Hope that's right but I don't think so.

I don't think Trump has been able to put a leash on Netanyahu yet, who knows what dirt he has on Trump....so the circus continues.

 

[Chuz Life]

Did Netanyahu approve of this new deal?

Because he is the one running the show here.

If he didn't then there is no deal.

Let's imagine Trump were to adopt your mindset and Trump were to pull all of the U.S. troops out of the Middle East and leave Bibi to clean up the issue of Iran trying to get nukes and trying to have total control of the Strait of Hormuz.

Even with Iran now in a damaged (if not obliterrated military condition. . . How do you see that playing out?

 

[skye]

Let's imagine Trump were to adopt your mindset and Trump were to pull all of the U.S. troops out of the Middle East and leave Bibi to clean up the issue of Iran trying to get nukes and trying to have total control of the Strait of Hormuz.

Even with Iran now in a damaged (if not obliterrated military condition. . . How do you see that playing out?

Bibi cannot clean up anything by himself; he needs the US to fight its wars didn't you know that?

Without the US help Bibi is lost.

 

[White 6]

/——/ No one including me ever said democRATs are involved in negotiations. What a screwball thing to suggest.

You are the one that brought them into it. Are you having a difficult cognitive moment. Obviously the democrats have nothing to do with subject "Iran to sign deal". There is nobody that even believes dems would started a war, depleting over half our strategic reserves of defensive missiles for the next 5 plus years, losing billions of Dollar$ of aircraft and equipment, to stop a program the President said he stopped with his attack last year, and his Secretary of State saying Iran had not restarted, and his own Director of National Intelligence confirm (based on latest most accurate Intelligence available to the head of all our intelligence networks) that Iran had not enriched any more nuclear material since the time their facilities had been bombed a year ago. Yet, Trump trusted no experts, only doing as Israel wanted, and failed to get any of the nuclear material (apparently buried by the intensive bombing a year prior) and failing to get Iran to it's knees, indeed prompting them to counter attack sites on American bases, sites in US friendly countries, at will, along with shutting down the straits of Hormuz, crippling the international supply of petroleum, causing massive fuel price increases and inflation in this country and around the world. It is as if, the administration did not even wargame possible responses of the country they were attacking, and proceeded blindly with this spur of the moment war, in support of Israel's wishes, yet hardly in American interests.

Last deal I heard (which involved no Dems) was Iran might agree, if we withdraw from blockading Iranian ports and pull out. It does not sound like Trump gets jackshit for his foolish military adventure, we will pay for, for years.

 

[Zincwarrior]

You are the one that brought them into it. Are you having a difficult cognitive moment. Obviously the democrats have nothing to do with subject "Iran to sign deal". There is nobody that even believes dems would started a war, depleting over half our strategic reserves of defensive missiles for the next 5 plus years, losing billions of Dollar$ of aircraft and equipment, to stop a program the President said he stopped with his attack last year, and his Secretary of State saying Iran had not restarted, and his own Director of National Intelligence confirm (based on latest most accurate Intelligence available to the head of all our intelligence networks) that Iran had not enriched any more nuclear material since the time their facilities had been bombed a year ago. Yet, Trump trusted no experts, only doing as Israel wanted, and failed to get any of the nuclear material (apparently buried by the intensive bombing a year prior) and failing to get Iran to it's knees, indeed prompting them to counter attack sites on American bases, sites in US friendly countries, at will, along with shutting down the straits of Hormuz, crippling the international supply of petroleum, causing massive fuel price increases and inflation in this country and around the world. It is as if, the administration did not even wargame possible responses of the country they were attacking, and proceeded blindly with this spur of the moment war, in support of Israel's wishes, yet hardly in American interests.

Last deal I heard (which involved no Dems) was Iran might agree, if we withdraw from blockading Iranian ports and pull out. It does not sound like Trump gets jackshit for his foolish military adventure, we will pay for, for years.

Plus they want all their billions back. No nuke deal. No regime change. Americans dead and billions wasted.

 

[White 6]

Hope that's right but I don't think so.

I don't think Trump has been able to put a leash on Netanyahu yet, who knows what dirt he has on Trump....so the circus continues.

You could easily be right. But, I am unconvinced, as nobody has ever gotten anything on Trump, that he actually gave a crap about, even if proven valid and true, and a lot has been proven to the country. He is actually rich enough, he simply does not have to care, so it is just a game, to him. And, since he will not be President again, it is a game, he has no stake in.