Stephanie
Diamond Member
- Jul 11, 2004
- 70,230
- 10,865
- 2,040
Iran Nuclear Deal Reached At Geneva Talks
- Thread starter J.E.D
- Start date
usmcstinger
Gold Member
- Dec 31, 2011
- 1,433
- 476
- 200
Another terrible forein policy move. Iran can not be trusted! Can our Government be trusted.
This certainly inhibits the Iranian people's quest for freedom.
The US has thrown Israel, Saudi Arabia and the Arab Gulf Coast States under the bus.
Reid committed to moving ahead with Iran sanctions in the Senate.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/11/21/us-iran-nuclear-sanctions-reid-idUSBRE9AK0WN20131121
Senator Ben Cardin (D-Md.) expressed worries as well.
"We are very concerned as to whether Iran will live up to even these commitments, and this is the first step," said Cardin, who also sits on the Foreign Relations Committee.
Cardin said the temporary deal should not be allowed to stand permanently.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/24/iran-deal-reactions_n_4333529.html
Looks like the Democratic Senators are going to be a big problem.
Last edited:
He knows:
1) Obama negotiated it.
2) THe GOP and Israel oppose it.
Ergo it must be a fantastic deal and anyone who opposes it is a racist.
Stephanie
Diamond Member
- Jul 11, 2004
- 70,230
- 10,865
- 2,040
Yep, we aren't going to let them drop this from people minds
all the way up to elections...here we come
rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 298,023
- 220,990
- 3,615
So....
The US, Britain, France, Germany, China and Russia think it is a good deal
Republicans say it sucks
Guess who is on the wrong side of history again?
The US, Britain, France, Germany, China and Russia think it is a good deal
Republicans say it sucks
Guess who is on the wrong side of history again?
The Obama Administration is good at that sort of thing. He threw over Poland and the Czech Republic to the Russians in return for a "restart" that led to Putin making Obama his bitch on Syria.
Stephanie
Diamond Member
- Jul 11, 2004
- 70,230
- 10,865
- 2,040
didn't a few of those countries think going to Iraq with Bush was good thing too?
hummmm and what did your dear ones say about that?
R.C. Christian
Gold Member
You "hater dupes" are pretty stupid. There is no way in hell that Iran get's saved. 1 year from now, or even ten, Iran is going to get bombed. Israel and the terrorist in Saudi will push it along if they have to because Iran is too important a prize.
WHo says they think it is a good deal?
Even muslims won't tolerate Twelvers. The Shah outlawed the cult giving believers the death penalty. The mullahs reinstated belief in the Twelfth Imam notice that the "agreement" cements in place all that mullah power.
If obama was interested in ending Iran as a danger, he would have supported the Green Revolution.
BullKurtz
Gold Member
- Banned
- #73
Germany certainly has a pristine record of caring about the Jews....so does Russia who Israel spied on for us throughout the Cold War. France too....and of course Barry Hussein Soetoro who once stomped out a meeting at the WH leaving Netanyahu sitting at the conference table with his mouth hanging open.....why Britain agreed to this is all that puzzles me.
Dot Com
Nullius in verba
He might as well have just directly armed them 
Oh wait 
A Republican President already did that in the mid- 1980's
Oh wait A Republican President already did that in the mid- 1980's
rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 298,023
- 220,990
- 3,615
Britain?
He might as well have just directly armed them
With nuclear weapons, right? Oh wait a minute.
And today is exactly like 30 years ago.
rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 298,023
- 220,990
- 3,615
Trajan
conscientia mille testes
I am not sure what to make of this, what deal exactly? it appears iran and the US are thinking they got 2 different things-
Iran nuclear deal: One agreement, wildly different reactions
By Holly Yan and Josh Levs, CNN
updated 12:05 PM EST, Sun November 24, 2013
snip-
In one corner, ardent supporters, like the White House, touted it as a resolution in which they didn't waver from their core beliefs. Iranian officials boasted the same.
President Barack Obama said the deal is a significant step forward.
"For the first time in nearly a decade, we have halted the progress of the Iranian nuclear program, and key parts of the program will be rolled back," Obama said late Saturday night.
"Iran has committed to halting certain levels of enrichment and neutralizing part of its stockpiles. ... And new inspections will provide extensive access to Iran's nuclear facilities and allow the international community to verify whether Iran is keeping its commitments."
He said those limitations are among several that will cut off Iran's most likely paths to a nuclear bomb.
meanwhile-
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani also lauded the deal struck between the P5+1 countries and Iran. But that's pretty much where the similarities stop.
Contrary to what Obama said, Rouhani said "all sanctions will be lifted" as part of the deal.
That's not the only difference in wording. Earlier, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said the written deal does not say that Iran can enrich uranium.
Rouhani, however, said the outcome means world powers have "recognized Iran's nuclear rights," including the right to enrich uranium.
"This right has been explicitly stipulated by this agreement, stressing that Iran will go on with enrichment," he said. "Enrichment will proceed similar to in the past."
According to the White House, Iran has agreed to stop enriching uranium above 5% purity. That's enough to produce electricity, but not enough to reach the level required to make a nuclear bomb.
more at
Iran nuclear deal: One agreement, wildly different reactions - CNN.com
if you recall Rouhani said enrichment was a red line a few weeks ago, that they would not allow crossed..
Iran's Rouhani says uranium enrichment 'red line'
Associated Press
By NASSER KARIMI November 10, 2013 6:08 AM
n an address to parliament, Rouhani said uranium enrichment is a "red line" that cannot be crossed.
"Nuclear rights in the international framework, including uranium enrichment, on its soil" are not negotiable, Rouhani was quoted as saying by the semiofficial ISNA news agency. "For us red lines are not crossable."
more at-
Iran's Rouhani says uranium enrichment 'red line'
so, which is it....
Iran nuclear deal: One agreement, wildly different reactions
By Holly Yan and Josh Levs, CNN
updated 12:05 PM EST, Sun November 24, 2013
snip-
In one corner, ardent supporters, like the White House, touted it as a resolution in which they didn't waver from their core beliefs. Iranian officials boasted the same.
President Barack Obama said the deal is a significant step forward.
"For the first time in nearly a decade, we have halted the progress of the Iranian nuclear program, and key parts of the program will be rolled back," Obama said late Saturday night.
"Iran has committed to halting certain levels of enrichment and neutralizing part of its stockpiles. ... And new inspections will provide extensive access to Iran's nuclear facilities and allow the international community to verify whether Iran is keeping its commitments."
He said those limitations are among several that will cut off Iran's most likely paths to a nuclear bomb.
meanwhile-
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani also lauded the deal struck between the P5+1 countries and Iran. But that's pretty much where the similarities stop.
Contrary to what Obama said, Rouhani said "all sanctions will be lifted" as part of the deal.
That's not the only difference in wording. Earlier, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said the written deal does not say that Iran can enrich uranium.
Rouhani, however, said the outcome means world powers have "recognized Iran's nuclear rights," including the right to enrich uranium.
"This right has been explicitly stipulated by this agreement, stressing that Iran will go on with enrichment," he said. "Enrichment will proceed similar to in the past."
According to the White House, Iran has agreed to stop enriching uranium above 5% purity. That's enough to produce electricity, but not enough to reach the level required to make a nuclear bomb.
more at
Iran nuclear deal: One agreement, wildly different reactions - CNN.com
if you recall Rouhani said enrichment was a red line a few weeks ago, that they would not allow crossed..
Iran's Rouhani says uranium enrichment 'red line'
Associated Press
By NASSER KARIMI November 10, 2013 6:08 AM
n an address to parliament, Rouhani said uranium enrichment is a "red line" that cannot be crossed.
"Nuclear rights in the international framework, including uranium enrichment, on its soil" are not negotiable, Rouhani was quoted as saying by the semiofficial ISNA news agency. "For us red lines are not crossable."
more at-
Iran's Rouhani says uranium enrichment 'red line'
so, which is it....
velvtacheeze
Gold Member
- Mar 10, 2013
- 1,959
- 299
- 130
Not racist. Warmonger.
rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 298,023
- 220,990
- 3,615
They signed up to it
Once again, Republicans are on the outside looking in
Why don't you tell us how much you hate the UN
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
[Columbia U] Mahmoud Khalil/Joseph Massad's "bibol" of 'balestine'- Started by Sayaras
- Replies: 0
-
-
