Iran may receive S-300 anti-aircraft missile systems from Russia

[irosie91]

why??

Because the only case of mass murder by AA missile in that region was committed by America.[/QUOTE]

so? the only act of war is the one YOU decide is an act of war?----you get to decide the "where and the when and the how"? -----allah spoke to you in
a dream?

 

[ESay]

So, the US taxpayer will give very expensive aircraft to Israel,

Israel is one of the countries which are considering buying the F-35’s.

making American targets legitimate.

What? I think that only a mute hasn’t yet cried ‘death to America’ in Iran.


And by the way, why should it be Israeli F-35’s rather than the US’s? In the future it may well be that the goals of Israel and the US will be quite the same.

 

[irosie91]

F-35's are just fighter jets. They don't have the gas tank large enough to allow them to reach Iran. You need long range bombers for that and Israel doesn't have any of those.

The F-35 is multirole aircraft.
Can the F-35’s be placed on an aircraft carrier being used by the US Navy and which is able to reach the Persian Gulf?

So, the US taxpayer will give very expensive aircraft to Israel, all to stop a threat that's 900 miles short of able to hit Israel, then allow Israel use of an aircraft carrier to get them within striking distance of Iran, making American targets legitimate.
Your post may be a little silly.

Iran's threat extends to any place in which a Hezbollah dog exists. Iran trains
and funds and arms Hezbollah and so is a LEGAL TARGET. The Hezbollah
infection has spread thruout the middle east and has been implicated in world wide
terrorism. As is true of the filth of Islamic terrorism----the operatives do not
wear uniforms----<<itself a violation . Every time the dogs and pigs strike----they
JUSTIFY return fire at WHATEVER target seems involved

 

[irosie91]

F-35's are just fighter jets. They don't have the gas tank large enough to allow them to reach Iran. You need long range bombers for that and Israel doesn't have any of those.

The F-35 is multirole aircraft.
Can the F-35’s be placed on an aircraft carrier being used by the US Navy and which is able to reach the Persian Gulf?

So, the US taxpayer will give very expensive aircraft to Israel, all to stop a threat that's 900 miles short of able to hit Israel, then allow Israel use of an aircraft carrier to get them within striking distance of Iran, making American targets legitimate.
Your post may be a little silly.

Israel has not attacked Iran-----your comment makes no sense at all. The USA is
a "legitimate target" just because Israel has access to ships that are in
striking distance of Iran? Iran has already attacked Israel via its operative
dog----NUS-KHARAH-ALLAH and friends, thus Iran and anything related to it is---by your logic----a legal target. Hezbollah dogs (Iranian operatives) have been sighted thruout the middle east ----in fact, even in the shariah cesspit---
INDONESIA. Do you consider the war between Hezbollah located in southern
Lebanon-----and Israel to be an "attack on Iran"?

 

[Indofred]

Israel has not attacked Iran

Are you sure?

7 June 1981

Israel, as usual, attacked a country is wasn't at war with, murdering civilians.
Just another in a long list of Israeli terrorist offences.

 

[Indofred]

so? the only act of war is the one YOU decide is an act of war?----you get to decide the "where and the when and the how"?

No, a US ship, illegally operating in Iranian waters, shot down a civilian airliner, murdering a lot of people.

That's pretty clear and, after the lies were busted, admitted by the US.

 

[Indofred]

Ergo, we had and have a responsibility to vacate both Iraq and Afghanistan?

Actually, you had a responsibility not to invade those places at all.

that's what you guys said about Germany and Japan

There's a difference between Germany, a country that was trying to ally with the US, and Japan, a country the US forced into war by blockading their oil supplies.

Of course, the Pearl harbour attack was a shock - but it wasn't.

 

[irosie91]

Israel has not attacked Iran

Are you sure?

7 June 1981

Israel, as usual, attacked a country is wasn't at war with, murdering civilians.
Just another in a long list of Israeli terrorist offences.

what a sick lump of excrement you are, Freddie. It was an acknowleged
fact that your hero ----murdering dog SADDAM was funding every meccaist slut
willing to tie a bomb to her whorish ass for the Islamic purpose of
murdering Israeli children. The whole civilized world cheered when Israel
knocked out Iraq's nuclear reactor. Saddam began his "LETS KILL DA JOOOOS" program way back in the 1960s He even sent his emissary to the
USA to drum up support for the Islamic BOMB ON STINKING ASS program.
way way back in the mid sixties. People will cheer again...... sit tight

 

[nat4900]

No, a US ship, illegally operating in Iranian waters, shot down a civilian airliner, murdering a lot of people.

That's pretty clear and, after the lies were busted, admitted by the US.

July 3, 1988, Iran Air Flight 655 (IR655) was shot down by USS Vincennes on the Bandar Abbas-Dubai rout, which resulted in the loss of life of 290 innocent civilians from six nations including 66 children. There were 38 non-Iranians aboard.
Iran Chamber Society History of Iran Shooting Down Iran Air Flight 655 IR655

Imagine how WE would have reacted had this incident been reversed.

 

[Indofred]

No, a US ship, illegally operating in Iranian waters, shot down a civilian airliner, murdering a lot of people.

That's pretty clear and, after the lies were busted, admitted by the US.

July 3, 1988, Iran Air Flight 655 (IR655) was shot down by USS Vincennes on the Bandar Abbas-Dubai rout, which resulted in the loss of life of 290 innocent civilians from six nations including 66 children. There were 38 non-Iranians aboard.
Iran Chamber Society History of Iran Shooting Down Iran Air Flight 655 IR655

Imagine how WE would have reacted had this incident been reversed.

The US would get all upset.
Because the US did it, they lied, then tried to ignore it.

 

[nat4900]

what a sick lump of excrement you are, Freddie. It was an acknowleged
fact that your hero ----murdering dog SADDAM was funding every meccaist slut
willing to tie a bomb to her whorish ass for the Islamic purpose of
murdering Israeli children. The whole civilized world cheered when Israel
knocked out Iraq's nuclear reactor. Saddam began his "LETS KILL DA JOOOOS" program way back in the 1960s He even sent his emissary to the
USA to drum up support for the Islamic BOMB ON STINKING ASS program.
way way back in the mid sixties. People will cheer again...... sit tight

 

[irosie91]

Ergo, we had and have a responsibility to vacate both Iraq and Afghanistan?

Actually, you had a responsibility not to invade those places at all.

that's what you guys said about Germany and Japan

There's a difference between Germany, a country that was trying to ally with the US, and Japan, a country the US forced into war by blockading their oil supplies.

Of course, the Pearl harbour attack was a shock - but it wasn't.

blockades and boycotts FORCE countries into war? ----in fact the USA
did not blockade Japan------but carry on--------your theory that islamo Nazi
BDS justifies attack is fine with me

 

[nat4900]

what a sick lump of excrement you are, Freddie. It was an acknowleged
fact that your hero ----murdering dog SADDAM was funding every meccaist slut
willing to tie a bomb to her whorish ass for the Islamic purpose of
murdering Israeli children. The whole civilized world cheered when Israel
knocked out Iraq's nuclear reactor. Saddam began his "LETS KILL DA JOOOOS" program way back in the 1960s He even sent his emissary to the
USA to drum up support for the Islamic BOMB ON STINKING ASS program.
way way back in the mid sixties. People will cheer again...... sit tight

This picture was taken when Rumsfeld was a closeted-democrat

 

[irosie91]

what a sick lump of excrement you are, Freddie. It was an acknowleged
fact that your hero ----murdering dog SADDAM was funding every meccaist slut
willing to tie a bomb to her whorish ass for the Islamic purpose of
murdering Israeli children. The whole civilized world cheered when Israel
knocked out Iraq's nuclear reactor. Saddam began his "LETS KILL DA JOOOOS" program way back in the 1960s He even sent his emissary to the
USA to drum up support for the Islamic BOMB ON STINKING ASS program.
way way back in the mid sixties. People will cheer again...... sit tight

what a sick lump of excrement you are, Freddie. It was an acknowleged
fact that your hero ----murdering dog SADDAM was funding every meccaist slut
willing to tie a bomb to her whorish ass for the Islamic purpose of
murdering Israeli children. The whole civilized world cheered when Israel
knocked out Iraq's nuclear reactor. Saddam began his "LETS KILL DA JOOOOS" program way back in the 1960s He even sent his emissary to the
USA to drum up support for the Islamic BOMB ON STINKING ASS program.
way way back in the mid sixties. People will cheer again...... sit tight

Your point?

 

[nat4900]

blockades and boycotts FORCE countries into war? ----in fact the USA
did not blockade Japan------but carry on--------your theory that islamo Nazi
BDS justifies attack is fine with me

You're dumber than usual, rosie (not an easy task).....Are you OK?

 

[Camp]

No, a US ship, illegally operating in Iranian waters, shot down a civilian airliner, murdering a lot of people.

That's pretty clear and, after the lies were busted, admitted by the US.

July 3, 1988, Iran Air Flight 655 (IR655) was shot down by USS Vincennes on the Bandar Abbas-Dubai rout, which resulted in the loss of life of 290 innocent civilians from six nations including 66 children. There were 38 non-Iranians aboard.
Iran Chamber Society History of Iran Shooting Down Iran Air Flight 655 IR655

Imagine how WE would have reacted had this incident been reversed.

The US entered Iranian waters during a response to an attack by Iranian gunboats on US helicopters. The USS Vincennes chased the gunboats back into Iranian waters. The Iranians stopped targeting and firing on American aircraft operating in the Persian Gulf after the shootdown of IR 655.

 

[irosie91]

blockades and boycotts FORCE countries into war? ----in fact the USA
did not blockade Japan------but carry on--------your theory that islamo Nazi
BDS justifies attack is fine with me

You're dumber than usual, rosie (not an easy task).....Are you OK?

you said nothing-----you simply farted and spat. If you imagine that you have something to "say"----why not say it?

 

[nat4900]

Your point?

Simple question: Were Reagan, Rummy and all neocons, anti-Semites?

 

[irosie91]

No, a US ship, illegally operating in Iranian waters, shot down a civilian airliner, murdering a lot of people.

That's pretty clear and, after the lies were busted, admitted by the US.

July 3, 1988, Iran Air Flight 655 (IR655) was shot down by USS Vincennes on the Bandar Abbas-Dubai rout, which resulted in the loss of life of 290 innocent civilians from six nations including 66 children. There were 38 non-Iranians aboard.
Iran Chamber Society History of Iran Shooting Down Iran Air Flight 655 IR655

Imagine how WE would have reacted had this incident been reversed.

The US entered Iranian waters during a response to an attack by Iranian gunboats on US helicopters. The USS Vincennes chased the gunboats back into Iranian waters. The Iranians stopped targeting and firing on American aircraft operating in the Persian Gulf after the shootdown of IR 655.

it's all they have-----Military error in an arena of conflict that THEY THEMSELVES CREATED

 

[nat4900]

The US entered Iranian waters during a response to an attack by Iranian gunboats on US helicopters. The USS Vincennes chased the gunboats back into Iranian waters. The Iranians stopped targeting and firing on American aircraft operating in the Persian Gulf after the shootdown of IR 655.

Here's a seldom seen picture of the result of our shooting down an Iranian civilian airline....Again, how would WE have reacted?