Iran Hacks GOP, MSM/Democrats silent this time (“Meddling” in elections suddenly no problem!)

The Islamic Republic of Iran, the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism, has reportedly hacked Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s campaign.

Politico began receiving internal campaign documents from the campaign late last month from an anonymous AOL email account that used the name “Robert.”

Microsoft published a report this week that confirmed that Iran was interfering in U.S. elections, particularly in swing states, through highly targeted activity online designed to sway voters in those states.


Come on Democrats and leftists.. bang the war drums against “meddling” in elections as you did in 2016!!!

Oh wait.. it’s against Trump. So.. let me guess… it’s different this time?
This time it has to be proven beyond the slightest of doubts.
 
I’m a cybersecurity professional so to debate with someone who believes Hillary’s government managed assets were hit multiple times and her unmanaged email server was never hit is like debating the existence of unicorns.

You have to believe what your dear leaders tell you. I get it.

So, um, did you examine her server? No? Then you are just guessing.

As for the laptop, have they provided a receipt linking that laptop with a purchase by Hunter or his company?
 
So, um, did you examine her server? No? Then you are just guessing.

As for the laptop, have they provided a receipt linking that laptop with a purchase by Hunter or his company?
Nobody has put forth the perimeter and internal security (if any) of her personal server. Check yourself as well…. As per your own words, you said the agency she worked for had been hacked multiple times. That was where she initiated the send mail protocol (SMTP) when she was sending her 33,000 emails. How and when was any of those emails encrypted? At what level were they encrypted?
 
Well, it's kind of hard to feel upset when you guys all thought MAGA2024 was a good password.
The question is how do you feel now that we know YOU are the traitor? Not the people you don't like. LOL
 
The Islamic Republic of Iran, the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism, has reportedly hacked Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s campaign.

Politico began receiving internal campaign documents from the campaign late last month from an anonymous AOL email account that used the name “Robert.”

Microsoft published a report this week that confirmed that Iran was interfering in U.S. elections, particularly in swing states, through highly targeted activity online designed to sway voters in those states.


Come on Democrats and leftists.. bang the war drums against “meddling” in elections as you did in 2016!!!

Oh wait.. it’s against Trump. So.. let me guess… it’s different this time?
How do we know it was Iran and not the DNC?
 
Nobody has put forth the perimeter and internal security (if any) of her personal server. Check yourself as well…. As per your own words, you said the agency she worked for had been hacked multiple times. That was where she initiated the send mail protocol (SMTP) when she was sending her 33,000 emails. How and when was any of those emails encrypted? At what level were they encrypted?

Don't care. Most of those 33K emails had nothing to do with her work, they were stuff like planning Chelsea's wedding.

Look, man, you guys spent 8 years trying to pretend that was a big deal and it really wasn't.
 
Trump asked Russia to hack Hillary's emails.

"Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing, I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press," Trump said in a July 27, 2016 news conference.
Who cares what Trump did? That doesn’t justify Iran hacking the Trump campaign. The dems should still be condemning it, either way.

Let me take a page out of the dem strategy book: “if you don’t condemn it, that means you are glad that it happened, and therefore, are complicit”.

Kinda like how you guys like to say “silence is violence”, well, “inaction is action”..
 
Who cares what Trump did? That doesn’t justify Iran hacking the Trump campaign. The dems should still be condemning it, either way.

Let me take a page out of the dem strategy book: “if you don’t condemn it, that means you are glad that it happened, and therefore, are complicit”.

Kinda like how you guys like to say “silence is violence”, well, “inaction is action”..
They won’t, the demafasict party is an ally of iran
 
Don't care. Most of those 33K emails had nothing to do with her work, they were stuff like planning Chelsea's wedding.

Look, man, you guys spent 8 years trying to pretend that was a big deal and it really wasn't.
Based on validated forensics, what percentage had nothing to do with government work?? If it had nothing to do with work, the same objective could have been accomplished with a personal email account and not a rogue email server.

Out of 33,000 emails, all it takes is one email having to do with work to be a problem.
 
Don't care. Most of those 33K emails had nothing to do with her work, they were stuff like planning Chelsea's wedding.

Look, man, you guys spent 8 years trying to pretend that was a big deal and it really wasn't.

From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.

The FBI also discovered several thousand work-related e-mails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014. We found those additional e-mails in a variety of ways. Some had been deleted over the years and we found traces of them on devices that supported or were connected to the private e-mail domain. Others we found by reviewing the archived government e-mail accounts of people who had been government employees at the same time as Secretary Clinton, including high-ranking officials at other agencies, people with whom a Secretary of State might naturally correspond.

This helped us recover work-related e-mails that were not among the 30,000 produced to State. Still others we recovered from the laborious review of the millions of e-mail fragments dumped into the slack space of the server decommissioned in 2013.

With respect to the thousands of e-mails we found that were not among those produced to State, agencies have concluded that three of those were classified at the time they were sent or received, one at the Secret level and two at the Confidential level. There were no additional Top Secret e-mails found. Finally, none of those we found have since been “up-classified.”



She had thousands of classified documents, and other Govt documents she had no business to, hidden for years
 
Nope, Trump is the one doing Putin's bidding, that makes him the traitor.

This is kind of a big nothingburger. We didn't need the Iranians to tell us that MAGA2024 is a shit show.
That the Iranians don't want Trump in here shows what a traitor you are
 
Trump called Nazis who killed "Very fine people". There were no Very Fine People except the ones that wanted to take the statue of racist Traitor Lee down.

Trump didn't even want to make the statement he made, as mealy-mouthed as it was.


Sure we are... We condemn Genocide when we see it.

This is what the world thinks.

View attachment 997142
No, he did not. And if you post the quote you are likely to post, I will post the rest of it that proves you wrong. You, however, will not change your belief, your stance, nor change your posting and repeating that lie over and over.
 
Lol you ignorant dimwits get hacked and you want Democrats to feel sorry for you? :fu:
Nope. Just pointing out the hypocrisy

Obama sent the govt hounds to get those who hacked the private DNC and downplay all the dirty corruption they found. The DNC MSM freaked out saying that the hack was wrong because it revealed their party’s corruption.

Now, a foreign adversary hacks Trump.. same exact situation.. but now you’re fine with it.

I’m fine with both. Private institutions need to be accountable for their own security

Your side isn’t. You got mad and said it was unfair that the DNC got hacked, but now are indifferent or celebrate when it happens to Trump.

It just proves the DNC/Democrats/MSM have no credibility.. yet again
 
Who cares what Trump did? That doesn’t justify Iran hacking the Trump campaign. The dems should still be condemning it, either way.

Let me take a page out of the dem strategy book: “if you don’t condemn it, that means you are glad that it happened, and therefore, are complicit”.

Kinda like how you guys like to say “silence is violence”, well, “inaction is action”..
Trump called on an enemy to hack his opponents emails. Which they did.

So he can't really bitch when another "enemy" does the same to him.
 
Trump called on an enemy to hack his opponents emails. Which they did.

So he can't really bitch when another "enemy" does the same to him.
1) yes he can because one doesn’t justify the other, unless you’re going to suggest the left are the same as Trump..

2) he didn’t “ask” Russia for help, it was said in a sarcastic manner. Do you really think Trump is going to ask a foreign adversary, on national television, to hack the opposing candidate? Be serious.

No Russian collusion was ever found, Russia would have tried to interfere anyway, it’s what other countries do. Hell, the U.S. has interfered in elections too, I mean shit, we’ve helped to overthrow governments.
 
1) yes he can because one doesn’t justify the other, unless you’re going to suggest the left are the same as Trump..

2) he didn’t “ask” Russia for help, it was said in a sarcastic manner. Do you really think Trump is going to ask a foreign adversary, on national television, to hack the opposing candidate? Be serious.

No Russian collusion was ever found, Russia would have tried to interfere anyway, it’s what other countries do. Hell, the U.S. has interfered in elections too, I mean shit, we’ve helped to overthrow governments.

Hey, whatever happened there was between Trump and the Iranians... not the Dem's problem.

The stuff they revealed isn't really that shocking, anyway. We know Trump's campaign is a hot mess, we don't need Iran to tell us that.

Yes, I do think Trump would ask a foreign adversary for help. I always amazes me when Trump does something shitty, you guys insist he wouldn't do that. Even after you watched him do it.

No Collusion with Russia was found because all the people who could rat out Trump kept their mouths shut and waited for a pardon. You don't pardon co-conspirators if you are innocent.
 
Hey, whatever happened there was between Trump and the Iranians... not the Dem's problem.

The stuff they revealed isn't really that shocking, anyway. We know Trump's campaign is a hot mess, we don't need Iran to tell us that.

Yes, I do think Trump would ask a foreign adversary for help. I always amazes me when Trump does something shitty, you guys insist he wouldn't do that. Even after you watched him do it.

No Collusion with Russia was found because all the people who could rat out Trump kept their mouths shut and waited for a pardon. You don't pardon co-conspirators if you are innocent.

Yes, I do think Trump would ask a foreign adversary for help.
That’s just ludicrous. You don’t think that his statement was rhetorical?

No Collusion with Russia was found because all the people who could rat out Trump kept their mouths shut and waited for a pardon. You don't pardon co-conspirators if you are innocent.

You don’t think they kept their mouth shut because there wasn’t anything there to say? They did big massive investigations on this..they came up with nothing. Perhaps that’s because nothing was there?
 
That’s just ludicrous. You don’t think that his statement was rhetorical?

No, I don't think Trump is smart enough to think rhetorically. Trump is a very stupid man. His own staffers have said so.

You don’t think they kept their mouth shut because there wasn’t anything there to say? They did big massive investigations on this..they came up with nothing. Perhaps that’s because nothing was there?

Uh, Manafort, Lewandowski, Flynn, were all found guilty of some bad behavior with the Russians... some of them were willing to cooperate, until Trump offered them pardons.
 
No, I don't think Trump is smart enough to think rhetorically. Trump is a very stupid man. His own staffers have said so.



Uh, Manafort, Lewandowski, Flynn, were all found guilty of some bad behavior with the Russians... some of them were willing to cooperate, until Trump offered them pardons.
With all of the years of investigation, they never found collusion. Trump has been investigated for 9 years straight. If it was there, they would have found it
 
Back
Top Bottom