Iran blinks, and lib trump haters will cry

To Iranian ports.
But, in fact, nobody is going through. If you are cooperative with one side - another side can sink you.
Deals dont work that way. Iran says we can sell but rest cant.
They didn't say it. They said, that neutral ships can go through after paying reasonable fee - 1 (may be 2) dollars per barrel. And of course, there is a military conflict there, and Americans may try to supply their bases on Arab's side of Persian gulf, which Iran can't allow.

Anyway, you guys already destroyed the freedom of navigation worldwide, and there are still consequences to happen.
 
Last edited:
You think Iran should be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. Bold position
Iran should be independent and should not be conqured by the USA. If giving them nukes is the only way to keep them independent - ok, they should have nukes. Of course, more nuclear states means less safety for everyone, and, in the ideal world, nukes should be taken from England and France (who commited much more acts of unprovoked aggression and supported much more terrorists).
 
Naive it is then.

A theocracy can call on God to justify pain. You have to rely on the notion that devotion to the Orange God King suffices.... for all Americans, not just you.
The government is supported by less than half of the people

Maybe much less than half

The rest to not want to die or suffer for a false prophet

But Iran does not have a 2nd Amendment and the people have no guns
 
Iran should be independent and should not be conqured by the USA. If giving them nukes is the only way to keep them independent - ok, they should have nukes. Of course, more nuclear states means less safety for everyone, and, in the ideal world, nukes should be taken from England and France (who commited much more acts of unprovoked aggression and supported much more terrorists).
You want the #1 state sponsor of terror in the world to have nuclear weapons. OK. Have a blessed day.
 
You want the #1 state sponsor of terror in the world to have nuclear weapons. OK. Have a blessed day.
Actually, the #1 state sponsor of terror in the world already have nuclear weapons.

And, what is more important, it's not me, it's Trump, who, by his violation of NPT and by his illegal and unprovoked aggression force other countries to acquire nuclear weapons.
 
Last edited:
Actually, the #1 state sponsor of terror in the world already have nuclear weapons.

And, what is more important, it's not me, it's Trump, who, by his violation of NPT and by his illegal and unprovoked aggression force other countries to acquire nuclear weapons.
Let's ignore 50 years of history, shall we.
 
Let's ignore 50 years of history, shall we.
Ok. Let's not ignore them. How many acts of direct aggresion commited the USA in recent 50 years? How many proxy conflicts did they started?
Iranians are simply innocent lambs, comparing with Americans.
 
Iranians are simply innocent lambs, comparing with Americans.
1776787356131.webp


You bet.
 
Those people were executed according a law, and after a proper trial for commiting certain crime.

gazaaa-1-27849.webp


And a lot of personally innocent people (including children) in Gaza were mass-murdered without any court and without law.

It's not that I like public hanging, but sometimes such things are necessary.
0_104e70_e3055de_orig.webp


And, of course, the specific forms of the law-enforcement are inner issue for any country. It's just not my business. What is my business - do this country attack other countries? French missiles can reach targets in Russia, and Iranian missiles can reach targets in Russia. Who's missiles I see as a larger threat to the world? Obviously, French, because France, in recent 50 years commited many acts of illegal and unprovoked aggression, and Iran didn't directly attack anyone.
 
15th post
Those people were executed according a law, and after a proper trial for commiting certain crime.

View attachment 1246781

And a lot of personally innocent people (including children) in Gaza were mass-murdered without any court and without law.

It's not that I like public hanging, but sometimes such things are necessary.
View attachment 1246782

And, of course, the specific forms of the law-enforcement are inner issue for any country. It's just not my business. What is my business - do this country attack other countries? French missiles can reach targets in Russia, and Iranian missiles can reach targets in Russia. Who's missiles I see as a larger threat to the world? Obviously, French, because France, in recent 50 years commited many acts of illegal and unprovoked aggression, and Iran didn't directly attack anyone.
Whatever.....your little regime puppet heart wants to believe.

..........Here's hoping one of those JDAM's finds you.
 
And a lot of personally innocent people (including children) in Gaza were mass-murdered without any court and without law.
I am sure you'll see lots of HAMAS swinging for that.
 
Back
Top Bottom