Iran accuses US........

[roomy]

m

 

[Johnney]

well why dont we let them actually get one nuke, then go in and attack? sure some poor nation would probably start to glow, but then we would be justified. cant be letting them 3rd world countries go around having nukes now can we

 

[dilloduck]

well why dont we let them actually get one nuke, then go in and attack? sure some poor nation would probably start to glow, but then we would be justified. cant be letting them 3rd world countries go around having nukes now can we

I guess saying a country should be wiped off the map is legitimate? Where's Israels' declaration of war?

 

[Hobbit]

Hey Iran, you're talking right out of the Democrat playbook, and whether you think it's legal or not, he's coming for you...

 

[Dr Grump]

well why dont we let them actually get one nuke, then go in and attack? sure some poor nation would probably start to glow, but then we would be justified. cant be letting them 3rd world countries go around having nukes now can we

too late...

 

[Dr Grump]

Hey Iran, you're talking right out of the Democrat playbook, and whether you think it's legal or not, he's coming for you...

Would be one of the silliest things Bush could do (if possible!!)

 

[dilloduck]

Would be one of the silliest things Bush could do (if possible!!)

Agreed----the US should let Israel have the honor of taking out the country that is openly threatening them in front if the entire world.

 

[BATMAN]

Agreed----the US should let Israel have the honor of taking out the country that is openly threatening them in front if the entire world.

The U.N. is getting ready to do what it does best:
UN eyes vote next week on Iran nuclear demand
I figure 16 or more of those over the course of 12 years.....

 

[Gunny]

Iran has strongly criticised the US at the United Nations, accusing Washington of threatening to launch a military strike against its nuclear facilities.
In a letter delivered to Secretary General Kofi Annan, Iran said the US was "openly" planning to attack Iran in breach of international law.

Officials from the five permanent members of the UN Security Council will discuss Iran in Paris on Tuesday.

Iran has resisted calls by the UN for it to suspend uranium enrichment.

The rhetoric between the US and Iran has become more heated following the UN nuclear watchdog's report on Friday which found Tehran had not complied with a UN demand to end uranium enrichment, says the BBC's Laura Trevelyan at the UN.

Tehran insists it has the right to a peaceful nuclear energy programme, although the US suspects it is trying to develop atomic weapons.

'Illegitimate'

In the letter to Mr Annan, Iran's ambassador to the UN criticised US President George W Bush, who has refused to rule out even a nuclear strike on Iranian targets.

IRAN CRISIS: NEXT STEPS
2 May: Negotiators from US, Russia, China, UK, France and Germany meet in Paris
3 May: Possible Security Council meeting to discuss IAEA report
9 May: Foreign ministers from US, Russia, China, UK, France and Germany meet at UN
US rhetoric amounted to "illegitimate and open threats to use force against the Islamic Republic of Iran," the letter said.

"These are in obvious contravention of international rules and the principles of the United Nations."

The letter referred specifically to a report in the New Yorker by journalist Seymour Hersh, which suggested US military planners were considering a "bunker-busting" nuclear strike.

Mr Bush has refused to rule out military action, but has repeatedly insisted that the dispute should be resolved diplomatically.

Busy week

The Iranian letter was delivered at the start of a busy week of diplomacy for the five permanent members of the UN Security Council.

Mr Bush discussed the Iranian issue during a phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday, officials said.

Along with China, Russia has been reluctant to pressure Tehran into concessions, and is opposed to the suggestion of sanctions or military action.

Foreign policy officials from the US, UK, Russia, China and France are to meet in Paris on Tuesday to discuss how to approach the Iranian issue.

The council itself could meet a day later to discuss the report issued last week by the UN's nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, which judged Iran to be in breach of UN requests that it halt enrichment.

A new Security Council resolution could be circulated that would make legally binding all previous calls for Iran to stop enriching uranium.

Foreign ministers from the five permanent members will then meet at UN in New York on 9 May.

This is hillarious. Iran goes to the UN. What does Iran expect them to do?