- Thread starter
- #21
Eagle, yes it would not be 100% they would be saved. Just much more likely.To the OP. I voted undecided as no one here can determine whether or not they could have been saved by a more timely response. The response should have happened and a hell of a lot sooner, and our State Department ignored the warnings and violence documented by the Judicial Watch site already posted. In that report the U.S. flag was the only flag still flying there as the other countries had pulled out.....Significantly the UK.............
Given all of this, why did we stay or not at least increase security. That is incompetent before the attack. It is also incompetent to not have a ready reaction force given the ongoing violence there............
Then to the main point that ticks me off.........They LIes about what happened afterwards..............They went full bore on the video even though all sources were saying otherwise.........
How about Team Obama manning up and saying the truth instead of trying to cover it up..................Even if it means you may have screwed up............Those that died deserved better than the lies spewed afterward. Which is one of my main complaints on Benghazi.
Curious, do you think it could be more than incompetence?