Infrastructure plan ..

[francoHFW]

You failed history, political science, and social studies didn't you? You can't even get your lies straight enough to make your confused facts sound convincing.

It gives me a Migraine to talk to people of such low intelligence and who are so easily influenced by their own bullshit.

Not surprising when you are dealing with a poster named Franco as in Franco Mussolini who was a Tyrant, a Leftist and a Liar.

If you're taking about National Socialism, that's Nazism, and the socialism in its name is pure bs propaganda, which of course you fall for every time.

You mean big government Nazi Germany that took from the rich for the good of the common people?

You morons and your public education keeps things like Waters World popular.

I went to private schools. The Nazis only took from rich jews. There was a hint of socialism in that they put everyone to work, but it was a sham as the industry was mainly preparing for war and in the end the debt could only be ended by conquest...

Nazi Germany was big government.
Who wants small government and who wants big government?

NG was totalitarian. They didn't waste any money on courts or legislatures, dupe. Totalitarians have huge police and military, but that's not government. Democracies have big gov't, courts and legislatures.

WTH? LOL. That was Benito. Franco actually comes from Francophile. I speak French etc.

 

[francoHFW]

You failed history, political science, and social studies didn't you? You can't even get your lies straight enough to make your confused facts sound convincing.

It gives me a Migraine to talk to people of such low intelligence and who are so easily influenced by their own bullshit.

Not surprising when you are dealing with a poster named Franco as in Franco Mussolini who was a Tyrant, a Leftist and a Liar.

You mean big government Nazi Germany that took from the rich for the good of the common people?

You morons and your public education keeps things like Waters World popular.

I went to private schools. The Nazis only took from rich jews. There was a hint of socialism in that they put everyone to work, but it was a sham as the industry was mainly preparing for war and in the end the debt could only be ended by conquest...

Nazi Germany was big government.
Who wants small government and who wants big government?

NG was totalitarian. They didn't waste any money on courts or legislatures, dupe. Totalitarians have huge police and military, but that's not government. Democracies have big gov't, courts and legislatures.

WTH? LOL. That was Benito. Franco actually comes from Francophile. I speak French etc.

Tree, PLEASE put your idiocy AFTER the QUOTE so you don't screw this all up too...

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

plan on bending over, and spreading your cheeks so Trump can blow smoke up your ass ...

(last paragraph)

The Trump infrastructure plan, by contrast, is unsound. Much of its cost would likely be wasted on private projects that would occur anyway, and it wouldn’t address many of the nation’s most pressing infrastructure needs. The assertion by Trump’s advisors that the plan would result in up to $1 trillion in new infrastructure investment is faulty. The plan would likely generate only a small amount of new infrastructure while adding to deficits and debt as a result of its wasteful, expensive tax breaks to private developers.

Trump Infrastructure Plan: Far Less Than the Claimed $1 Trillion in New Projects | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities


so the Big Developer is paving the way for other developers, and the right of way is via debt, deficits, and taxpayers pockets.

GEE,who ******* knew?

When it comes to infrastructure, each state has their own budget. Also, if you do a little research of our nation's history, our interstates and bridges were turned over to their respective states to maintain after the Federal Government provided the funding. So based on that initial decision, why are we allowing the Federal Government to step in when the states obviously can't maintain their own budgets? At what point do we charge the states responsible for their choices, of where they want to spend their budget and tax revenue resources? This also brings validation in tying into the argument of sanctuary cities, with the choosing benefits for illegals over the care and maintenance of your own bridges and roads. We have actually created a federal government that is the common "bail-out" door step dumping ground, for everyone else's lack of being held responsible and accountable to their own choices. Is it any wonder we are so far in debt? What would happen should the government not be there to handle the state's own budget short falls, based on their own lack of accountability.? Yet the left want to criticize Trump's handling of HIS businesses and budgets? Perhaps we should give the left and the states an opportunity to prove themselves better.

Just a few thoughts on the subject of state budgets and infrastructure.

 

[Weatherman2020]

plan on bending over, and spreading your cheeks so Trump can blow smoke up your ass ...

(last paragraph)

The Trump infrastructure plan, by contrast, is unsound. Much of its cost would likely be wasted on private projects that would occur anyway, and it wouldn’t address many of the nation’s most pressing infrastructure needs. The assertion by Trump’s advisors that the plan would result in up to $1 trillion in new infrastructure investment is faulty. The plan would likely generate only a small amount of new infrastructure while adding to deficits and debt as a result of its wasteful, expensive tax breaks to private developers.

Trump Infrastructure Plan: Far Less Than the Claimed $1 Trillion in New Projects | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities


so the Big Developer is paving the way for other developers, and the right of way is via debt, deficits, and taxpayers pockets.

GEE,who ******* knew?

When it comes to infrastructure, each state has their own budget. Also, if you do a little research of our nation's history, our interstates and bridges were turned over to their respective states to maintain after the Federal Government provided the funding. So based on that initial decision, why are we allowing the Federal Government to step in when the states obviously can't maintain their own budgets? At what point do we charge the states responsible for their choices, of where they want to spend their budget and tax revenue resources? This also brings validation in tying into the argument of sanctuary cities, with the choosing benefits for illegals over the care and maintenance of your own bridges and roads. We have actually created a federal government that is the common "bail-out" door step dumping ground, for everyone else's lack of being held responsible and accountable to their own choices. Is it any wonder we are so far in debt? What would happen should the government not be there to handle the state's own budget short falls, based on their own lack of accountability.? Yet the left want to criticize Trump's handling of HIS businesses and budgets? Perhaps we should give the left and the states an opportunity to prove themselves better.

Just a few thoughts on the subject of state budgets and infrastructure.

Yep. Calif has a $1.6B budget deficit this year, and no plan to deal with it, just spend spend spend on illegals and a train to nowhere.

 

[danielpalos]

plan on bending over, and spreading your cheeks so Trump can blow smoke up your ass ...

(last paragraph)

The Trump infrastructure plan, by contrast, is unsound. Much of its cost would likely be wasted on private projects that would occur anyway, and it wouldn’t address many of the nation’s most pressing infrastructure needs. The assertion by Trump’s advisors that the plan would result in up to $1 trillion in new infrastructure investment is faulty. The plan would likely generate only a small amount of new infrastructure while adding to deficits and debt as a result of its wasteful, expensive tax breaks to private developers.

Trump Infrastructure Plan: Far Less Than the Claimed $1 Trillion in New Projects | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities


so the Big Developer is paving the way for other developers, and the right of way is via debt, deficits, and taxpayers pockets.

GEE,who ******* knew?

He got "stuck in pander pledge traffic".

 

[Weatherman2020]

Tell your mom to get her money back.

I have a Masters in History with a concentration on Hitler and you are a MORON. LOL.

Need to get your money back.
Nazi Germany was big government.
Who wants big government, right or left?
Come on, 50/50 guess with your Masters.

That's not gov't, that's their police and military apparatus, dingbat.

Your 4th grade history is showing again. The Reichstag was a typical left wing government.

LW radicals are communists, who are against aristocrats and corporations. Nazis are RW fascists, have no problem with them. Your theory is alternative facts, for dupes only. Poor America.

Nazis took over corporations, took from who they felt had too much, were obsessed with race, believed in Darwinism, and loved big government.

Sure sounds familiar to a certain political party in the US today.

 

[francoHFW]

I have a Masters in History with a concentration on Hitler and you are a MORON. LOL.

Need to get your money back.
Nazi Germany was big government.
Who wants big government, right or left?
Come on, 50/50 guess with your Masters.

That's not gov't, that's their police and military apparatus, dingbat.

Your 4th grade history is showing again. The Reichstag was a typical left wing government.

LW radicals are communists, who are against aristocrats and corporations. Nazis are RW fascists, have no problem with them. Your theory is alternative facts, for dupes only. Poor America.

Nazis took over corporations, took from who they felt had too much, were obsessed with race, believed in Darwinism, and loved big government.

Sure sounds familiar to a certain political party in the US today.

Jewish corps and those who fought him, only. So which corps have Dems "taken over", superdupe?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Need to get your money back.
Nazi Germany was big government.
Who wants big government, right or left?
Come on, 50/50 guess with your Masters.

That's not gov't, that's their police and military apparatus, dingbat.

Your 4th grade history is showing again. The Reichstag was a typical left wing government.

LW radicals are communists, who are against aristocrats and corporations. Nazis are RW fascists, have no problem with them. Your theory is alternative facts, for dupes only. Poor America.

Nazis took over corporations, took from who they felt had too much, were obsessed with race, believed in Darwinism, and loved big government.

Sure sounds familiar to a certain political party in the US today.

Jewish corps and those who fought him, only. So which corps have Dems "taken over", superdupe?

Some Masters you got there, champ. Junkers had his factory confiscated and he was tossed in prison by the Nazi's.

Glad to see you're not tired of losing, this is fun.

 

[francoHFW]

That's not gov't, that's their police and military apparatus, dingbat.

Your 4th grade history is showing again. The Reichstag was a typical left wing government.

LW radicals are communists, who are against aristocrats and corporations. Nazis are RW fascists, have no problem with them. Your theory is alternative facts, for dupes only. Poor America.

Nazis took over corporations, took from who they felt had too much, were obsessed with race, believed in Darwinism, and loved big government.

Sure sounds familiar to a certain political party in the US today.

Jewish corps and those who fought him, only. So which corps have Dems "taken over", superdupe?

Some Masters you got there, champ. Junkers had his factory confiscated and he was tossed in prison by the Nazi's.

Glad to see you're not tired of losing, this is fun.

Just as I said, dupe. He was a socialist and a pacifist. What about all the other corporations whose aristocratic leaders went along and formed the base of Nazi power? DUHHHH.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Your 4th grade history is showing again. The Reichstag was a typical left wing government.

LW radicals are communists, who are against aristocrats and corporations. Nazis are RW fascists, have no problem with them. Your theory is alternative facts, for dupes only. Poor America.

Nazis took over corporations, took from who they felt had too much, were obsessed with race, believed in Darwinism, and loved big government.

Sure sounds familiar to a certain political party in the US today.

Jewish corps and those who fought him, only. So which corps have Dems "taken over", superdupe?

Some Masters you got there, champ. Junkers had his factory confiscated and he was tossed in prison by the Nazi's.

Glad to see you're not tired of losing, this is fun.

Just as I said, dupe. He was a socialist and a pacifist. What about all the other corporations whose aristocratic leaders went along and formed the base of Nazi power? DUHHHH.

"Just as you said"
The government ordered companies what to make and how many to make. Just as all socialist governments do. And those that refused, they were tossed into prison. Just as all socialist governments do.

Small limited governments do not have the power to force socialist principles or imprison people just for opposing the government.
But large encompassing governments do, that is why the left loves large encompassing governments and conservatives do not. Just as Nazi Germany did, the left loves the idea of taking guns away from citizens so they can't oppose their fascist plans.

 

[francoHFW]

LW radicals are communists, who are against aristocrats and corporations. Nazis are RW fascists, have no problem with them. Your theory is alternative facts, for dupes only. Poor America.

Nazis took over corporations, took from who they felt had too much, were obsessed with race, believed in Darwinism, and loved big government.

Sure sounds familiar to a certain political party in the US today.

Jewish corps and those who fought him, only. So which corps have Dems "taken over", superdupe?

Some Masters you got there, champ. Junkers had his factory confiscated and he was tossed in prison by the Nazi's.

Glad to see you're not tired of losing, this is fun.

Just as I said, dupe. He was a socialist and a pacifist. What about all the other corporations whose aristocratic leaders went along and formed the base of Nazi power? DUHHHH.

"Just as you said"
The government ordered companies what to make and how many to make. Just as all socialist governments do. And those that refused, they were tossed into prison. Just as all socialist governments do.

Small limited governments do not have the power to force socialist principles or imprison people just for opposing the government.
But large encompassing governments do, that is why the left loves large encompassing governments and conservatives do not. Just as Nazi Germany did, the left loves the idea of taking guns away from citizens so they can't oppose their fascist plans.

As I said, only Jewish corps and those who fought him were ruined. SOCIALIST are democratic, you're talking about COMMUNISTS and TOTALITARIANS- Including RW Nazis and other fascists. DUHHH. The size of gov't has NO BEARING on its effect on the populace. It's the ideology, stupid.

Brainwashed ignoramus RWers....poor America...

 

[Weatherman2020]

Nazis took over corporations, took from who they felt had too much, were obsessed with race, believed in Darwinism, and loved big government.

Sure sounds familiar to a certain political party in the US today.

Jewish corps and those who fought him, only. So which corps have Dems "taken over", superdupe?

Some Masters you got there, champ. Junkers had his factory confiscated and he was tossed in prison by the Nazi's.

Glad to see you're not tired of losing, this is fun.

Just as I said, dupe. He was a socialist and a pacifist. What about all the other corporations whose aristocratic leaders went along and formed the base of Nazi power? DUHHHH.

"Just as you said"
The government ordered companies what to make and how many to make. Just as all socialist governments do. And those that refused, they were tossed into prison. Just as all socialist governments do.

Small limited governments do not have the power to force socialist principles or imprison people just for opposing the government.
But large encompassing governments do, that is why the left loves large encompassing governments and conservatives do not. Just as Nazi Germany did, the left loves the idea of taking guns away from citizens so they can't oppose their fascist plans.

As I said, only Jewish corps and those who fought him were ruined. SOCIALIST are democratic, you're talking about COMMUNISTS and TOTALITARIANS- Including RW Nazis and other fascists. DUHHH. The size of gov't has NO BEARING on its effect on the populace. It's the ideology, stupid.

Brainwashed ignoramus RWers....poor America...

Wow, let's dissect this one.

"As I said, only Jewish corps and those who fought him were ruined."

As Democrats would love to do today.

"SOCIALIST are democratic"
How many votes did Saddam get? Oh yeah, all the votes. Socialist democracy in action.

"you're talking about COMMUNISTS and TOTALITARIANS- Including RW Nazis and other fascists."
No, I am pointing out the fallacy of your argument that a socialist party is RW.

DUHHH. The size of gov't has NO BEARING on its effect on the populace. It's the ideology, stupid.
Your inability to grasp the concept that the conservative desire to have a small limited government all but guarantees liberty and justice for its citizens simply displays you are brainwashed.

"Brainwashed ignoramus RWers....poor America..."
Poor baby. Your gun grabbing days are over.

 

[danielpalos]

plan on bending over, and spreading your cheeks so Trump can blow smoke up your ass ...

(last paragraph)

The Trump infrastructure plan, by contrast, is unsound. Much of its cost would likely be wasted on private projects that would occur anyway, and it wouldn’t address many of the nation’s most pressing infrastructure needs. The assertion by Trump’s advisors that the plan would result in up to $1 trillion in new infrastructure investment is faulty. The plan would likely generate only a small amount of new infrastructure while adding to deficits and debt as a result of its wasteful, expensive tax breaks to private developers.

Trump Infrastructure Plan: Far Less Than the Claimed $1 Trillion in New Projects | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities


so the Big Developer is paving the way for other developers, and the right of way is via debt, deficits, and taxpayers pockets.

GEE,who ******* knew?

When it comes to infrastructure, each state has their own budget. Also, if you do a little research of our nation's history, our interstates and bridges were turned over to their respective states to maintain after the Federal Government provided the funding. So based on that initial decision, why are we allowing the Federal Government to step in when the states obviously can't maintain their own budgets? At what point do we charge the states responsible for their choices, of where they want to spend their budget and tax revenue resources? This also brings validation in tying into the argument of sanctuary cities, with the choosing benefits for illegals over the care and maintenance of your own bridges and roads. We have actually created a federal government that is the common "bail-out" door step dumping ground, for everyone else's lack of being held responsible and accountable to their own choices. Is it any wonder we are so far in debt? What would happen should the government not be there to handle the state's own budget short falls, based on their own lack of accountability.? Yet the left want to criticize Trump's handling of HIS businesses and budgets? Perhaps we should give the left and the states an opportunity to prove themselves better.

Just a few thoughts on the subject of state budgets and infrastructure.

Yep. Calif has a $1.6B budget deficit this year, and no plan to deal with it, just spend spend spend on illegals and a train to nowhere.

We legalized pot simply for the sake capitalism and expect around a billion in revenue, to start. The right wing, hates capitalism and that form of competition; just national socialists, and don't even know it. Ask Ding or boss.

 

[danielpalos]

Jewish corps and those who fought him, only. So which corps have Dems "taken over", superdupe?

Some Masters you got there, champ. Junkers had his factory confiscated and he was tossed in prison by the Nazi's.

Glad to see you're not tired of losing, this is fun.

Just as I said, dupe. He was a socialist and a pacifist. What about all the other corporations whose aristocratic leaders went along and formed the base of Nazi power? DUHHHH.

"Just as you said"
The government ordered companies what to make and how many to make. Just as all socialist governments do. And those that refused, they were tossed into prison. Just as all socialist governments do.

Small limited governments do not have the power to force socialist principles or imprison people just for opposing the government.
But large encompassing governments do, that is why the left loves large encompassing governments and conservatives do not. Just as Nazi Germany did, the left loves the idea of taking guns away from citizens so they can't oppose their fascist plans.

As I said, only Jewish corps and those who fought him were ruined. SOCIALIST are democratic, you're talking about COMMUNISTS and TOTALITARIANS- Including RW Nazis and other fascists. DUHHH. The size of gov't has NO BEARING on its effect on the populace. It's the ideology, stupid.

Brainwashed ignoramus RWers....poor America...

Wow, let's dissect this one.

"As I said, only Jewish corps and those who fought him were ruined."

As Democrats would love to do today.

"SOCIALIST are democratic"
How many votes did Saddam get? Oh yeah, all the votes. Socialist democracy in action.

"you're talking about COMMUNISTS and TOTALITARIANS- Including RW Nazis and other fascists."
No, I am pointing out the fallacy of your argument that a socialist party is RW.

DUHHH. The size of gov't has NO BEARING on its effect on the populace. It's the ideology, stupid.
Your inability to grasp the concept that the conservative desire to have a small limited government all but guarantees liberty and justice for its citizens simply displays you are brainwashed.

"Brainwashed ignoramus RWers....poor America..."
Poor baby. Your gun grabbing days are over.

right wing national socialists are to the right of left wing liberal socialists.

 

[Weatherman2020]

plan on bending over, and spreading your cheeks so Trump can blow smoke up your ass ...

(last paragraph)

The Trump infrastructure plan, by contrast, is unsound. Much of its cost would likely be wasted on private projects that would occur anyway, and it wouldn’t address many of the nation’s most pressing infrastructure needs. The assertion by Trump’s advisors that the plan would result in up to $1 trillion in new infrastructure investment is faulty. The plan would likely generate only a small amount of new infrastructure while adding to deficits and debt as a result of its wasteful, expensive tax breaks to private developers.

Trump Infrastructure Plan: Far Less Than the Claimed $1 Trillion in New Projects | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities


so the Big Developer is paving the way for other developers, and the right of way is via debt, deficits, and taxpayers pockets.

GEE,who ******* knew?

When it comes to infrastructure, each state has their own budget. Also, if you do a little research of our nation's history, our interstates and bridges were turned over to their respective states to maintain after the Federal Government provided the funding. So based on that initial decision, why are we allowing the Federal Government to step in when the states obviously can't maintain their own budgets? At what point do we charge the states responsible for their choices, of where they want to spend their budget and tax revenue resources? This also brings validation in tying into the argument of sanctuary cities, with the choosing benefits for illegals over the care and maintenance of your own bridges and roads. We have actually created a federal government that is the common "bail-out" door step dumping ground, for everyone else's lack of being held responsible and accountable to their own choices. Is it any wonder we are so far in debt? What would happen should the government not be there to handle the state's own budget short falls, based on their own lack of accountability.? Yet the left want to criticize Trump's handling of HIS businesses and budgets? Perhaps we should give the left and the states an opportunity to prove themselves better.

Just a few thoughts on the subject of state budgets and infrastructure.

Yep. Calif has a $1.6B budget deficit this year, and no plan to deal with it, just spend spend spend on illegals and a train to nowhere.

We legalized pot simply for the sake capitalism and expect around a billion in revenue, to start. The right wing, hates capitalism and that form of competition; just national socialists, and don't even know it. Ask Ding or boss.

Any money will simply be given to illegals.

California budget guts middle-class aid, keeps scholarships for illegals.

 

[owebo]

Some Masters you got there, champ. Junkers had his factory confiscated and he was tossed in prison by the Nazi's.

Glad to see you're not tired of losing, this is fun.

Just as I said, dupe. He was a socialist and a pacifist. What about all the other corporations whose aristocratic leaders went along and formed the base of Nazi power? DUHHHH.

"Just as you said"
The government ordered companies what to make and how many to make. Just as all socialist governments do. And those that refused, they were tossed into prison. Just as all socialist governments do.

Small limited governments do not have the power to force socialist principles or imprison people just for opposing the government.
But large encompassing governments do, that is why the left loves large encompassing governments and conservatives do not. Just as Nazi Germany did, the left loves the idea of taking guns away from citizens so they can't oppose their fascist plans.

As I said, only Jewish corps and those who fought him were ruined. SOCIALIST are democratic, you're talking about COMMUNISTS and TOTALITARIANS- Including RW Nazis and other fascists. DUHHH. The size of gov't has NO BEARING on its effect on the populace. It's the ideology, stupid.

Brainwashed ignoramus RWers....poor America...

Wow, let's dissect this one.

"As I said, only Jewish corps and those who fought him were ruined."

As Democrats would love to do today.

"SOCIALIST are democratic"
How many votes did Saddam get? Oh yeah, all the votes. Socialist democracy in action.

"you're talking about COMMUNISTS and TOTALITARIANS- Including RW Nazis and other fascists."
No, I am pointing out the fallacy of your argument that a socialist party is RW.

DUHHH. The size of gov't has NO BEARING on its effect on the populace. It's the ideology, stupid.
Your inability to grasp the concept that the conservative desire to have a small limited government all but guarantees liberty and justice for its citizens simply displays you are brainwashed.

"Brainwashed ignoramus RWers....poor America..."
Poor baby. Your gun grabbing days are over.

right wing national socialists are to the right of left wing liberal socialists.

Why are you fascist liberals so afraid to celebrate you are fascists?

 

[yiostheoy]

plan on bending over, and spreading your cheeks so Trump can blow smoke up your ass ...

(last paragraph)

The Trump infrastructure plan, by contrast, is unsound. Much of its cost would likely be wasted on private projects that would occur anyway, and it wouldn’t address many of the nation’s most pressing infrastructure needs. The assertion by Trump’s advisors that the plan would result in up to $1 trillion in new infrastructure investment is faulty. The plan would likely generate only a small amount of new infrastructure while adding to deficits and debt as a result of its wasteful, expensive tax breaks to private developers.

Trump Infrastructure Plan: Far Less Than the Claimed $1 Trillion in New Projects | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities


so the Big Developer is paving the way for other developers, and the right of way is via debt, deficits, and taxpayers pockets.

GEE,who ******* knew?

We desperately need newer more modern airports, new roads, more dams and reservoirs, and a few more bridges would be nice too.

Throw in a few more bombers, submarines, and aircraft carriers and you can pretty much put everybody back to work.

Same as Adolf did with their Autobahn and all the tanks and planes.

WW2 is what ended The Great Depression of the 1930's though.

FDR's public works did not accomplish that much.

But once FDR got the Pacific Fleet bombed by Japan because he moved it to Hawaii within reach of Tokyo's 6 aircraft carriers, then sh!t hit the fan immediately and the US was started down the road of world dominance, military build-up, deficit spending, and everything we see today -- just today it is not on as large a scale.

After DJT squashes ISIS he is going to need to look for a bigger enemy.

China should be perfect !!!

 

[francoHFW]

Some Masters you got there, champ. Junkers had his factory confiscated and he was tossed in prison by the Nazi's.

Glad to see you're not tired of losing, this is fun.

Just as I said, dupe. He was a socialist and a pacifist. What about all the other corporations whose aristocratic leaders went along and formed the base of Nazi power? DUHHHH.

"Just as you said"
The government ordered companies what to make and how many to make. Just as all socialist governments do. And those that refused, they were tossed into prison. Just as all socialist governments do.

Small limited governments do not have the power to force socialist principles or imprison people just for opposing the government.
But large encompassing governments do, that is why the left loves large encompassing governments and conservatives do not. Just as Nazi Germany did, the left loves the idea of taking guns away from citizens so they can't oppose their fascist plans.

As I said, only Jewish corps and those who fought him were ruined. SOCIALIST are democratic, you're talking about COMMUNISTS and TOTALITARIANS- Including RW Nazis and other fascists. DUHHH. The size of gov't has NO BEARING on its effect on the populace. It's the ideology, stupid.

Brainwashed ignoramus RWers....poor America...

Wow, let's dissect this one.

"As I said, only Jewish corps and those who fought him were ruined."

As Democrats would love to do today.

"SOCIALIST are democratic"
How many votes did Saddam get? Oh yeah, all the votes. Socialist democracy in action.

"you're talking about COMMUNISTS and TOTALITARIANS- Including RW Nazis and other fascists."
No, I am pointing out the fallacy of your argument that a socialist party is RW.

DUHHH. The size of gov't has NO BEARING on its effect on the populace. It's the ideology, stupid.
Your inability to grasp the concept that the conservative desire to have a small limited government all but guarantees liberty and justice for its citizens simply displays you are brainwashed.

"Brainwashed ignoramus RWers....poor America..."
Poor baby. Your gun grabbing days are over.

right wing national socialists are to the right of left wing liberal socialists.

Also to your right...No guns have ever been grabbed, dupe. 80%+ believed in ending background check loopholes etc before the NRA started its latest bs propaganda campaign...now only 70%.

 

[francoHFW]

Just as I said, dupe. He was a socialist and a pacifist. What about all the other corporations whose aristocratic leaders went along and formed the base of Nazi power? DUHHHH.

"Just as you said"
The government ordered companies what to make and how many to make. Just as all socialist governments do. And those that refused, they were tossed into prison. Just as all socialist governments do.

Small limited governments do not have the power to force socialist principles or imprison people just for opposing the government.
But large encompassing governments do, that is why the left loves large encompassing governments and conservatives do not. Just as Nazi Germany did, the left loves the idea of taking guns away from citizens so they can't oppose their fascist plans.

As I said, only Jewish corps and those who fought him were ruined. SOCIALIST are democratic, you're talking about COMMUNISTS and TOTALITARIANS- Including RW Nazis and other fascists. DUHHH. The size of gov't has NO BEARING on its effect on the populace. It's the ideology, stupid.

Brainwashed ignoramus RWers....poor America...

Wow, let's dissect this one.

"As I said, only Jewish corps and those who fought him were ruined."

As Democrats would love to do today.

"SOCIALIST are democratic"
How many votes did Saddam get? Oh yeah, all the votes. Socialist democracy in action.

"you're talking about COMMUNISTS and TOTALITARIANS- Including RW Nazis and other fascists."
No, I am pointing out the fallacy of your argument that a socialist party is RW.

DUHHH. The size of gov't has NO BEARING on its effect on the populace. It's the ideology, stupid.
Your inability to grasp the concept that the conservative desire to have a small limited government all but guarantees liberty and justice for its citizens simply displays you are brainwashed.

"Brainwashed ignoramus RWers....poor America..."
Poor baby. Your gun grabbing days are over.

right wing national socialists are to the right of left wing liberal socialists.

Why are you fascist liberals so afraid to celebrate you are fascists?

"Liberal Fascism" is the bible of ignorant right wing superdupes...fascism is far RW totalitarianism. The only real political spectrum is one that differentiates between lw communism and rw fascism, dupes.

 

[danielpalos]

plan on bending over, and spreading your cheeks so Trump can blow smoke up your ass ...

(last paragraph)

The Trump infrastructure plan, by contrast, is unsound. Much of its cost would likely be wasted on private projects that would occur anyway, and it wouldn’t address many of the nation’s most pressing infrastructure needs. The assertion by Trump’s advisors that the plan would result in up to $1 trillion in new infrastructure investment is faulty. The plan would likely generate only a small amount of new infrastructure while adding to deficits and debt as a result of its wasteful, expensive tax breaks to private developers.

Trump Infrastructure Plan: Far Less Than the Claimed $1 Trillion in New Projects | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities


so the Big Developer is paving the way for other developers, and the right of way is via debt, deficits, and taxpayers pockets.

GEE,who ******* knew?

When it comes to infrastructure, each state has their own budget. Also, if you do a little research of our nation's history, our interstates and bridges were turned over to their respective states to maintain after the Federal Government provided the funding. So based on that initial decision, why are we allowing the Federal Government to step in when the states obviously can't maintain their own budgets? At what point do we charge the states responsible for their choices, of where they want to spend their budget and tax revenue resources? This also brings validation in tying into the argument of sanctuary cities, with the choosing benefits for illegals over the care and maintenance of your own bridges and roads. We have actually created a federal government that is the common "bail-out" door step dumping ground, for everyone else's lack of being held responsible and accountable to their own choices. Is it any wonder we are so far in debt? What would happen should the government not be there to handle the state's own budget short falls, based on their own lack of accountability.? Yet the left want to criticize Trump's handling of HIS businesses and budgets? Perhaps we should give the left and the states an opportunity to prove themselves better.

Just a few thoughts on the subject of state budgets and infrastructure.

Yep. Calif has a $1.6B budget deficit this year, and no plan to deal with it, just spend spend spend on illegals and a train to nowhere.

We legalized pot simply for the sake capitalism and expect around a billion in revenue, to start. The right wing, hates capitalism and that form of competition; just national socialists, and don't even know it. Ask Ding or boss.

Any money will simply be given to illegals.

California budget guts middle-class aid, keeps scholarships for illegals.

Illegals are not the problem.

The economy of California is the largest in the United States. As of 2015, California's gross state product (GSP) is about $2.496 trillion.

We just need better management. With one billion in revenues expected, we can afford to maintain dams in areas currently still experiencing drought; along with current exigencies.