The establishment economists, the corporate and government controlled media, and the government have one POV on the handling of the economy, and they are going to do their best, to gas-light the masses with that POV.
Likewise, depending upon where you sit in the socioeconomic strata of society, this narrative is not entirely false, so to a large degree, a lot of folks can swallow it.
As far as that one tiny mis-statement? I am far too involved in this thread, to make any moderation decisions that would derail, a largely fruitful conversation, from both perspectives based on that.
You could file a report based on that alone, but I doubt anything would be done on that. It is a frivolous complaint, IMO. Not enough to trash a whole thread.
Banker had already made this EXACT SAME TOPIC, but, had been unable to hide his hyper-partisanship, and keep his venomous bile under-wraps for even the length require for a Title and an OP, so, his first attempt was trashed under the Clean Start rules;
Folks just have an honest disagreement of how the labor situation is, and what the cost of survival is, based on their position in society.
Minimum wage workers, getting two or three jobs, just to pay the rent, make a car note, and cover insurance, living on food stamps because of the cost of food. . . IS NOT, a good indicator of a healthy economy, because of,
"record employment."
But the fools that run the government, and make the propaganda, can tell themselves, and try to gas-light the masses all they want, that it is. This type of situation will eventually lead to one thing, recession. (As some experts are claiming.)
. . . and they will
all lie about what they plan to do about the situation, both parties.
Lucky for them, most of the people, don't have a clue they are all liars, IMO.