1. Not untouchable, those agencies need the top several layers replaced with non-partisan people.
Me too.
There was no moderatr bias. Trump got stomped by a superior mind.This is the benefit of the years of citizens not trusting media. I believe the bias from the moderators in their effort to help her, hurt her greatly, especially when she repeated long debunked claims.
She didn't provide any substance about economics and illegal immigration which is what she needed to do.
Interesting I suppose.
Independent voters surprise pollster with reactions to Trump's debate performance: 'Didn't expect it'
Independent voters overlapped with Republicans in support of former President Trump's immigration policies during Tuesday's presidential debate, according to voter dials from a Fox News focus group.www.foxnews.com
Dials monitoring the reaction of a Fox News focus group during Tuesday's presidential debate showed independent voters overlapping with Republicans in support of former President Trump's immigration policies.
Trump took aim at Vice President Kamala Harris during the ABC News Presidential Debate, blaming the Biden-Harris administration for "destroying the fabric of our country" with the influx of illegal immigration.
The former president blamed the administration for the rise in "migrant crime," a sentiment that seemingly resonated with not just Republicans, but a large number of independent respondents.
The focus group comprised seven Democrats, five independents and five Republicans, and was represented by blue, yellow and red lines, respectively. When Trump spoke of the rising crime at the hands of illegal immigrants, the yellow line monitoring the independent reaction rose drastically in Trump's favor, overlapping with the red Republican line.
substance? trump lost it when he wastes our time on the" economy " to spout a national enquirer headline about haitians.This is the benefit of the years of citizens not trusting media. I believe the bias from the moderators in their effort to help her, hurt her greatly, especially when she repeated long debunked claims.
She didn't provide any substance about economics and illegal immigration which is what she needed to do.
Interesting I suppose.
Independent voters surprise pollster with reactions to Trump's debate performance: 'Didn't expect it'
Independent voters overlapped with Republicans in support of former President Trump's immigration policies during Tuesday's presidential debate, according to voter dials from a Fox News focus group.
Dials monitoring the reaction of a Fox News focus group during Tuesday's presidential debate showed independent voters overlapping with Republicans in support of former President Trump's immigration policies.
Trump took aim at Vice President Kamala Harris during the ABC News Presidential Debate, blaming the Biden-Harris administration for "destroying the fabric of our country" with the influx of illegal immigration.
The former president blamed the administration for the rise in "migrant crime," a sentiment that seemingly resonated with not just Republicans, but a large number of independent respondents.
The focus group comprised seven Democrats, five independents and five Republicans, and was represented by blue, yellow and red lines, respectively. When Trump spoke of the rising crime at the hands of illegal immigrants, the yellow line monitoring the independent reaction rose drastically in Trump's favor, overlapping with the red Republican line.
long debunked? I think yesterday's claims. were just debunked today.
Most independent voters are basically disinterested voters.
The ones that "lean" towards a particular party are considered more reliable votes for the party, as far as the data shows. How weird is that?
Most independent voters are not interested in partisan politics and more interested in solutions instead of false rhetoric.
This is true, and why the debate turned out so bad for harris
To put it kindly, Trump should have stayed home. I can't see how his performance would not be embarrassing for Trump supporters. He looked and sounded like he was at a rally and not a presidential debate. Obviously, there was no debate prep. Harris baited him half dozen times, and he took the bait every time. While Harris skirted around the questions about policy if elected, Trump didn't even bother to answer, simple claiming there would be no problem it I were president.
High tariffs would be a disaster. If you move form the political to the economic arena, you'll find nearly ever economist of note believes his plan to put high tariffs on China would be a disaster. It would create shortages, drive prices up and send inflation up that the Fed has driven down from 9% in 2022 to 2.5% today.
Trump knowing he was not going the win the debate he began preparing his supporters for the loss several weeks ago with comments about media bias and particularly, ABC. Trump had repeatedly sought to manage expectations about the debate. Just last week, he insisted at a Fox News town hall that Harris would receive questions in advance, though there was no evidence to back up his claim. The moderators squashed the speculation at the start of Tuesday’s debate by saying neither nominee had seen questions ahead of time.
You already have tariffs.kn China, all of Europe and Canada juet hit China with more tariffs. China has had tariffs on the U.S for.years. This is about shifting investment and manufacutring away from China because their government has the goal of sinking the U.S and replacing her and the West. It's that simple. Should the world have boycotted Germany in 1941 or increased investment?
Yes and these guys complained about moderator bias even though Trump got to speak for more time than Harris.
Tell all that to Trudeau.
Of course we have had tariffs on China but Trump is proposing major tariffs that will certainly hurt the US economy. The idea that these tariffs will bring back American manufacturing is a bit naïve. There are too many other low cost alternatives that produce goods nearly as cheap as China such as Taiwan, South Korea, Indonesia, and an the Philippines. These suppliers are generally a much cheaper alternatives than making major new investments in plants in the US.
the trade war with china on trump's term cast the taxpayers billions of dollars in agricultural subsidies - probably as inflationary a policy as any.
