Incredible: CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC Refuse to Broadcast Trump Legal Team News Conference on Voter Fraud

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Yeah, OAN and Newsmax are both in Trump's trousers, sucking hard and vying for his love.

You're the authority on sucking, I suppose.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

After screaming for over 2 weeks that there is "no evidence" of voter fraud in this election, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, and CBS declined to broadcast even part of the Trump legal team's news conference yesterday where the team spent over an hour presenting evidence of voter fraud. Here's the news conference:

Have they presented this "evidence" in front of a judge...in court? No??...well, then, no one gives a shit about conspiracy theories.
Evidence is given in court in front of a judge, not in front of a TV camera....but in this case, they have none.

They are in the process of presenting this evidence in courts. But, of course, you don't care how clear the evidence of fraud is. You just want to see Trump defeated, even if that means ignoring the fact that the election was stolen.

This election might prove to be a turning point in American history, the point where we lost our constitutional republic and our electoral process.

How's that presenting of evidence coming along? Haven't seen anything but TV statements in the last 24 hours.
Perhaps you can point out to the class which states are hearing this evidence?

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

No, my post is factual

Sure. Whatever.

 

[busybee01]

After screaming for over 2 weeks that there is "no evidence" of voter fraud in this election, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, and CBS declined to broadcast even part of the Trump legal team's news conference yesterday where the team spent over an hour presenting evidence of voter fraud. Here's the news conference:

Have they presented this "evidence" in front of a judge...in court? No??...well, then, no one gives a shit about conspiracy theories.
Evidence is given in court in front of a judge, not in front of a TV camera....but in this case, they have none.

What about all the conspiracy theories by the left regarding Trump the last 4 years. The MSM was quick to jump on every last one of those. Heck, most lefties still believe in many of them despite evidence to the contrary.

The Democrats didn't try to delegitimize our elections.

No, they just tried to swindle us all. What you call "delegitimize" just means report the facts about Democrat fraud.

Had Obama tried to block the transition coordination efforts, Democrats would have been the first to criticize him.

We know how trumpybear used the Russian inference.

Who are you trying to kid?

Prove the swindle and I'll agree with you.

Giuliani will prove it when he submits his case. However, there is already plenty of evidence publicly available. Here's a sample.

There were 100,000 votes for Biden in George without votes for any other candidates. There were about 500 of such ballots for Trump.

He won't. The second he and the other ambulance chasers do, the jig is up. Because they have no evidence. The recounts and lawsuits aren't their endgame. They're just a distraction.
The real game is convincing the Republican legislatures in MI and PA to send a slate of electors that will deliver the election for Trump.

They have plenty of evidence moron.

They have no evidence.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

How's that presenting of evidence coming along? Haven't seen anything but TV statements in the last 24 hours.
Perhaps you can point out to the class which states are hearing this evidence?

Evidence is withheld for the Supreme Court justices to see. Ask Tucker Carlson.
As much as I admire him Sidney Powell owes him nothing and will not endanger her case to
puff up Tucker's ratings.

 

[busybee01]

After screaming for over 2 weeks that there is "no evidence" of voter fraud in this election, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, and CBS declined to broadcast even part of the Trump legal team's news conference yesterday where the team spent over an hour presenting evidence of voter fraud. Here's the news conference:

Have they presented this "evidence" in front of a judge...in court? No??...well, then, no one gives a shit about conspiracy theories.
Evidence is given in court in front of a judge, not in front of a TV camera....but in this case, they have none.

What about all the conspiracy theories by the left regarding Trump the last 4 years. The MSM was quick to jump on every last one of those. Heck, most lefties still believe in many of them despite evidence to the contrary.

The Democrats didn't try to delegitimize our elections.

No, they just tried to swindle us all. What you call "delegitimize" just means report the facts about Democrat fraud.

Had Obama tried to block the transition coordination efforts, Democrats would have been the first to criticize him.

We know how trumpybear used the Russian inference.

Who are you trying to kid?

Prove the swindle and I'll agree with you.

Giuliani will prove it when he submits his case. However, there is already plenty of evidence publicly available. Here's a sample.

There were 100,000 votes for Biden in George without votes for any other candidates. There were about 500 of such ballots for Trump.

Is he going to give us a affadivit from Hugo Chavez?

 

[Camp]

When press conferences are used as lie festival propaganda misinformation conduits they can be ignored. A report on Jr.'s Corona situation would be far more newsworthy than anything the usual parade of election fraud fools has to say.

Your opinion is noted and rejected almost simultaneously. Thanks.

No, my post is factual

yeah like your babble that FDR was a great president.

Not my babble, a half-century or more of famous historians from both political parties have issued formal declarations year after year. Add multiple tributes and Memorials. Your guy was elected once with help from Russia, rejected fired and dumped. My guy was elected four times by unquestionable patriots.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

How's that presenting of evidence coming along? Haven't seen anything but TV statements in the last 24 hours.
Perhaps you can point out to the class which states are hearing this evidence?

Evidence is withheld for the Supreme Court justices to see. Ask Tucker Carlson.
As much as I admire him Sidney Powell owes him nothing and will not endanger her case to
puff up Tucker's ratings.

Well they just blew off Pirro too. So that makes two captive audiences.
They have two outlets in Newsmax and OAN they could go to. Why aren't they presenting their "evidence" there?
Again, I'm not sure what hope this gets to the SC you're holding out for.
All lawsuits have been thrown out. There's nothing to take to the SC

 

[LeftofLeft]

Thank god for the free press.

Today’s press is one of collusion. If these media stalwarts did a better job of reporting all angles and/or not sitting on stories that make their guy/gal look bad, there would be know market for FoxNews, OAN, NewsMax.

 

[dudmuck]

After screaming for over 2 weeks that there is "no evidence" of voter fraud in this election, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, and CBS declined to broadcast even part of the Trump legal team's news conference yesterday where the team spent over an hour presenting evidence of voter fraud. Here's the news conference:

what a bunch of cowards,how obvious can you get that they dont want americans to see the evidence? if there was nothing to it,they would be eager to show it knowing they could easily humiliate trump but they wont show it cause they know they cat refute it. the trolls like mac can only sling shit in defeat like the monkey trolls they are.

Did they actually present any evidence?

âFrivolous,â âInsubstantial,â âBad Faithâ: Harvard Law Experts Weigh In On Trump Election Lawsuits | News | The Harvard Crimson

President Donald J. Trump’s recent lawsuits alleging election fraud are drawing criticism from HLS faculty, who claim the lawsuits lack evidence and present a danger to democracy.

www.thecrimson.com

This is the reason why. Anybody with a law degree can see that if this type of legal work was provided by a regular, non-celebrity law firm/lawyer they’d all be disbarred, sued for malpractice, and sanctioned by the court.
In michigan, theyre being sued for voter supression. And the last Arizona suit is tossed; have any succeeded?

 

[Staidhup]

They do as their told.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Well they just blew off Pirro too. So that makes two captive audiences.
They have two outlets in Newsmax and OAN they could go to. Why aren't they presenting their "evidence" there?
Again, I'm not sure what hope this gets to the SC you're holding out for.
All lawsuits have been thrown out. There's nothing to take to the SC

Right
And yet Wood and Powell will be arguing in front of the court within two weeks.
Your snarky bullshit notwithstanding. Keep hope alive, fool.

 

[eddiew37]

Have they presented this "evidence" in front of a judge...in court? No??...well, then, no one gives a shit about conspiracy theories.
Evidence is given in court in front of a judge, not in front of a TV camera....but in this case, they have none.

Nobody but you deceitfully claims a news conference is intended to be the same as testimony in open court.
So congratulations on your pathetic performance.
It's called NEWS! You know...information about vital upcoming events, like the future of the nation.
Maybe because that future has no place for old demented Joe Biden these networks don't feel like
they need to care.

I hope that during the Trump second term he takes some of these networks on as they have a duty under the terms of their FCC licenses that allow them to broadcast to carry important news to the viewing public.

CNN and MSNBC would broadcast an Obama fart if they could get one on a sound bite.
The double standard is ridiculous.

An Obama fart is worth more than a half hour of trump bs

 

[ElmerMudd]

so hundreds of sworn affidavits according to you libs isnt evidence... ok then, they go to jail if lying you fucking losers. Of course they are real. Hundreds, not one or 2, hundreds in many states.

Then file them in court where it counts, not waved around at press screeches with sweaty hair dye guy.

No, according to the Republican led Michigan legislature or the Georgia Repuiblica govenor and most importantly, Ben Ginsberg, Republican lead election lawyer who litigated Bush-Gore has said Trump's action are a threat to our democracy burt there are legal safeguards to stop everything he is trying.
Absolute stupid dumb shits like you, believe the lies and threaten our democracy.

 

[bripat9643]

When press conferences are used as lie festival propaganda misinformation conduits they can be ignored. A report on Jr.'s Corona situation would be far more newsworthy than anything the usual parade of election fraud fools has to say.

Your opinion is noted and rejected almost simultaneously. Thanks.

No, my post is factual

yeah like your babble that FDR was a great president.

Not my babble, a half-century or more of famous historians from both political parties have issued formal declarations year after year. Add multiple tributes and Memorials. Your guy was elected once with help from Russia, rejected fired and dumped. My guy was elected four times by unquestionable patriots.

"Famous historians" meaning leftwing douchebags.

 

[bripat9643]

so hundreds of sworn affidavits according to you libs isnt evidence... ok then, they go to jail if lying you fucking losers. Of course they are real. Hundreds, not one or 2, hundreds in many states.

Then file them in court where it counts, not waved around at press screeches with sweaty hair dye guy.

No, according to the Republican led Michigan legislature or the Georgia Repuiblica govenor and most importantly, Ben Ginsberg, Republican lead election lawyer who litigated Bush-Gore has said Trump's action are a threat to our democracy burt there are legal safeguards to stop everything he is trying.
Absolute stupid dumb shits like you, believe the lies and threaten our democracy.

Please quote them.

 

[ElmerMudd]

so hundreds of sworn affidavits according to you libs isnt evidence... ok then, they go to jail if lying you fucking losers. Of course they are real. Hundreds, not one or 2, hundreds in many states.

Then file them in court where it counts, not waved around at press screeches with sweaty hair dye guy.

No, according to the Republican led Michigan legislature or the Georgia Repuiblica govenor and most importantly, Ben Ginsberg, Republican lead election lawyer who litigated Bush-Gore has said Trump's action are a threat to our democracy burt there are legal safeguards to stop everything he is trying.
Absolute stupid dumb shits like you, believe the lies and threaten our democracy.

Please quote them.

Most people can find this information themself. I understand you have limited abilities so I provided the info below. Hopefully, you can find someone to read it to you and explain what the articles says. May God help you.

Michigan GOP leaders after White House meeting: 'We will follow the law'

"And the candidates who win the most votes win elections and Michigan's electoral votes," Michigan's top two Republicans said in a statement.

www.detroitnews.com

Georgia officials certify election results showing Biden win

ATLANTA (AP) — Georgia's governor and top elections official on Friday certified results showing Joe Biden won the presidential race over Republican President Donald Trump, bringing the state one step closer to wrapping up an election fraught with unfounded accusations of fraud by Trump and his supp

apnews.com

https://electionlawblog.org/?p=117992

 

[Lakhota]

After screaming for over 2 weeks that there is "no evidence" of voter fraud in this election, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, and CBS declined to broadcast even part of the Trump legal team's news conference yesterday where the team spent over an hour presenting evidence of voter fraud. Here's the news conference:

Show us just ONE court hearing where Trump lawyers told a judge there is evidence of FRAUD. They scream FRAUD on TV - but tell judges that they have no evidence of FRAUD. Why is that?

 

[Contumacious]

After screaming for over 2 weeks that there is "no evidence" of voter fraud in this election, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, and CBS declined to broadcast even part of the Trump legal team's news conference yesterday where the team spent over an hour presenting evidence of voter fraud. Here's the news conference:

The Fake News Media aka the SEE BS Network are anti-Trumpers - they want the president removed by ANY MEANS NECESSARY - by a coup disguised as an impeachment or a fraud disguised an an election.

 

[bripat9643]

so hundreds of sworn affidavits according to you libs isnt evidence... ok then, they go to jail if lying you fucking losers. Of course they are real. Hundreds, not one or 2, hundreds in many states.

Then file them in court where it counts, not waved around at press screeches with sweaty hair dye guy.

No, according to the Republican led Michigan legislature or the Georgia Repuiblica govenor and most importantly, Ben Ginsberg, Republican lead election lawyer who litigated Bush-Gore has said Trump's action are a threat to our democracy burt there are legal safeguards to stop everything he is trying.
Absolute stupid dumb shits like you, believe the lies and threaten our democracy.

Please quote them.

Most people can find this information themself. I understand you have limited abilities so I provided the info below. Hopefully, you can find someone to read it to you and explain what the articles says. May God help you.

Michigan GOP leaders after White House meeting: 'We will follow the law'

"And the candidates who win the most votes win elections and Michigan's electoral votes," Michigan's top two Republicans said in a statement.

www.detroitnews.com

Georgia officials certify election results showing Biden win

ATLANTA (AP) — Georgia's governor and top elections official on Friday certified results showing Joe Biden won the presidential race over Republican President Donald Trump, bringing the state one step closer to wrapping up an election fraught with unfounded accusations of fraud by Trump and his supp

apnews.com

https://electionlawblog.org/?p=117992

So where are the quotes of them saying Trump's actions are a threat to democracy?